Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Supercharger Discussion (https://www.miataturbo.net/supercharger-discussion-38/)
-   -   TDR Rotrex Update with Dyno Charts! (https://www.miataturbo.net/supercharger-discussion-38/tdr-rotrex-update-dyno-charts-86349/)

black roadster 10-21-2015 06:07 PM

TDR Rotrex Update with Dyno Charts!
 
Did someone ask for Dyno Charts? Please let us know what you think and share the news!

Click here for the latest new about the TDR Rotrex kit

robertcope 10-21-2015 08:06 PM

Very nice. I'm assuming it can make more power with a build motor?

robert

Chilicharger665 10-21-2015 08:27 PM

Finally! Now make that oil cooler that fits down low on the passenger side like we talked about last week!

Oh4One4 10-21-2015 09:08 PM

Were AFR's mapped for those runs?

Braineack 10-21-2015 09:23 PM

nice torque.

dcamp2 10-22-2015 10:39 AM

Nice. Glad someone is making progress on a rotrex kit!


I'm slightly skeptical of the dyno charts (mostly the 1.6), just based on what Mobius and a few others have done on more heavily worked over 1.8l engines.

18psi 10-22-2015 10:42 AM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1277307)
nice torque.

:giggle::hatecat:

Originally Posted by dcamp2 (Post 1277419)
Nice. Glad someone is making progress on a rotrex kit!


I'm slightly skeptical of the dyno charts (mostly the 1.6), just based on what Mobius and a few others have done on more heavily worked over 1.8l engines.

I bet the fuel and timing is "SUPER OPTIMIZED" with those power cards
:giggle:

dcamp2 10-22-2015 11:00 AM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277420)
:giggle::hatecat:


I bet the fuel and timing is "SUPER OPTIMIZED" with those power cards
:giggle:


I'm sure it's fine for most... Especially those who will appreciate decent power gains for minimal installation work and fuss.

mgeoffriau 10-22-2015 11:11 AM


Originally Posted by dcamp2 (Post 1277422)
I'm sure it's fine for most... Especially those who will appreciate decent power gains for minimal installation work and fuss.

Seriously. I thought maybe, maybe after half the forum had gone back to N/A builds we might be past throwing shade at every non-turbo setup.

18psi 10-22-2015 11:14 AM

:hustler:

mgeoffriau 10-22-2015 11:16 AM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277426)
:hustler:

Use your words.

18psi 10-22-2015 11:18 AM

I bet they achieved those numbers using Stoly as an octane booster.

aidandj 10-22-2015 11:19 AM

Wow. 310 injectors? When I make 220hp I'm using 75% duty cycle of my 610cc injectors.

18psi 10-22-2015 11:22 AM

Tone down the hatorade, turbo-lovin biggot
:giggle:

aidandj 10-22-2015 11:23 AM

1 Attachment(s)
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1445527419

robertcope 10-22-2015 11:24 AM

Eh. I'd love to give this kit a try. Looks pretty simple to install. I'll use my MegaSquirt, though.

robert

Braineack 10-22-2015 11:25 AM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 1277425)
Seriously. I thought maybe, maybe after half the forum had gone back to N/A builds we might be past throwing shade at every non-turbo setup.

that's just silly talk.

Braineack 10-22-2015 11:26 AM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277428)
I bet they achieved those numbers using Stoly as an octane booster.

keep in mind there was like $2000 worth of supporting parts...

my simple ass turbo setup, that was simple and easy to install, made more torque after it suffered foreign object damage and the turbine wheel was contacting the housing while spinning.

Mazduh 10-22-2015 11:27 AM

Nice numbers. I'd love to see this kit with a proper ems.

albuquerquefx 10-22-2015 01:06 PM

Why did the original dyno on the 1.6L Sunburst stop at 5500RPM? Is that the factory redline for that car? (I honestly do not know.) If that's the factory redline, what work was performed to allow it to spin to 7250?

Braineack 10-22-2015 01:21 PM


Originally Posted by albuquerquefx (Post 1277497)
Why did the original dyno on the 1.6L Sunburst stop at 5500RPM? Is that the factory redline for that car? (I honestly do not know.) If that's the factory redline, what work was performed to allow it to spin to 7250?


The Base Line dyno for the stock 1.6L we had was from an earlier dyno run and did not match up to our current dyno charts.
read

albuquerquefx 10-22-2015 02:08 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1277508)
read

Noob status:confirmed. :(

patsmx5 10-22-2015 03:12 PM


Originally Posted by dcamp2 (Post 1277422)
I'm sure it's fine for most... Especially those who will appreciate decent power gains for minimal installation work and fuss.

Sounds perfect. I bet they will sell a lot of them if the kit is as well sorted as it looks. Sounds like they fixed all the problems I've read about older rotrex kits (compressor too small, oil getting too hot for rotrex, cracked mounting hardware).

Having made my own DIY SC kit (and mine is no where near as nice as theirs), I can tell you it's wayyy harder to get it working well compared to a turbo setup. If this were for sale before I built mine, I probably would have bought it.

patsmx5 10-22-2015 03:14 PM


Originally Posted by aidandj (Post 1277429)
Wow. 310 injectors? When I make 220hp I'm using 75% duty cycle of my 610cc injectors.

That don't sound right for the HP on your setup. I thought people made 300whp with 550s on gasoline?

black roadster 10-22-2015 03:15 PM


Originally Posted by robertcope (Post 1277292)
Very nice. I'm assuming it can make more power with a build motor?

robert

Yes. These were all stock motors. TDR has a track car with a fully built motor running MegaSquirt. They will be getting it dynoed ASAP.


Originally Posted by Oh4One4 (Post 1277304)
Were AFR's mapped for those runs?

These examples are using piggy-back fuel and timing controllers.


Originally Posted by dcamp2 (Post 1277419)
Nice. Glad someone is making progress on a rotrex kit!

I'm slightly skeptical of the dyno charts (mostly the 1.6), just based on what Mobius and a few others have done on more heavily worked over 1.8l engines.

TDR was as surprised as anybody. These are not inflated but corrected charts.


Originally Posted by dcamp2 (Post 1277422)
I'm sure it's fine for most... Especially those who will appreciate decent power gains for minimal installation work and fuss.

The idea is simplicity and no fuss. I can't wait to see what the TDR Track Beast dynos at. I'm thinking over 300 RWHP


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277428)
I bet they achieved those numbers using Stoly as an octane booster.

Let's not go there. :vash:


Originally Posted by Mazduh (Post 1277437)
Nice numbers. I'd love to see this kit with a proper ems.

Hopefully soon! The Fuel and Timing cards are actually pretty good though. Perfect for simplicity and safe reliability.


Originally Posted by albuquerquefx (Post 1277497)
Why did the original dyno on the 1.6L Sunburst stop at 5500RPM? Is that the factory redline for that car? (I honestly do not know.) If that's the factory redline, what work was performed to allow it to spin to 7250?

The Base Line dyno for the stock 1.6L TDR has was from an earlier dyno run and did not match up to their current dyno charts.

aidandj 10-22-2015 03:34 PM

4 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 1277588)
That don't sound right for the HP on your setup. I thought people made 300whp with 550s on gasoline?

I'll post a log when I get back to my computer.

Found one. Attached. 220hp run. Dyno plot is somewhere in my build.

I even found the dynojet run file.

Chilicharger665 10-22-2015 03:41 PM

So what all size Rotrex's can fit on your bracket? C15-60, C30-64, C30-74, C30-84, and C30-94?

Are there prices yet?

I really like the position of your Rotrex oil cooler and I talked to William last week about you guys mirroring that on the other side with an engine oil cooler. How is that coming along?

black roadster 10-22-2015 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by Chilicharger665 (Post 1277600)
So what all size Rotrex's can fit on your bracket? C15-60, C30-64, C30-74, C30-84, and C30-94?

Are there prices yet?

I really like the position of your Rotrex oil cooler and I talked to William last week about you guys mirroring that on the other side with an engine oil cooler. How is that coming along?

I know we've used a C30-74, C30-84 and C30-94 with our bracket.

Looking at starting around $4700 with inter-cooler, fuel management, catch can, injectors, fuel pump, etc...

This is William! :giggle: I believe Gary made the mirrored engine oil cooler brackets so they should hopefully be out soon as well.

albumleaf 10-22-2015 10:47 PM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277420)
:giggle::hatecat:


I bet the fuel and timing is "SUPER OPTIMIZED" with those power cards
:giggle:

If there's anything Tuning Done Right knows it's timing and fuel.

wannafbody 10-23-2015 09:51 AM

Looks like a nice kit for the DIY installer who wants reliability and not having to repair their car constantly.

How would a Rotrex and a coldside double charger system work? Might be a sick build if you could keep the engine in one piece. If you can twin turbo, who not a twin supercharger system?

dcamp2 10-23-2015 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by wannafbody (Post 1277796)
Looks like a nice kit for the DIY installer who wants reliability and not having to repair their car constantly.

How would a Rotrex and a coldside double charger system work? Might be a sick build if you could keep the engine in one piece. If you can twin turbo, who not a twin supercharger system?


Why not get a bigger supercharger if you want more power? Have you seen any twin charged DIY systems work well? I haven't.

aidandj 10-23-2015 10:26 AM

How is a fuel card and 3* retarded timing reliable?

black roadster 10-23-2015 10:27 AM


Originally Posted by albumleaf (Post 1277701)
If there's anything Tuning Done Right knows it's timing and fuel.

TDR is a trademark of Track Dog Racing. Tuning Done Right is in no way affiliated with TDR or Track Dog Racing.

albumleaf 10-23-2015 12:58 PM


Originally Posted by black roadster (Post 1277802)
TDR is a trademark of Track Dog Racing. Tuning Done Right is in no way affiliated with TDR or Track Dog Racing.

:giggle:

albuquerquefx 10-23-2015 01:09 PM

Yeah, I saw the FPR and timing retard tricks; someone, somewhere will drop a standalone into the setup and find another 15 horses without trying.

Braineack 10-23-2015 01:12 PM


Originally Posted by albuquerquefx (Post 1277860)
Yeah, I saw the FPR and timing retard tricks; someone, somewhere will drop a standalone into the setup and find another 15 horses without trying.

what do they do about the lack of tq?

shuiend 10-23-2015 01:14 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1277864)
what do they do about the lack of tq?

Not bend rods?

mgeoffriau 10-23-2015 01:18 PM

Downshift?

Braineack 10-23-2015 01:23 PM

how does downshifting make up for the lack of about 50rwtq on all these plots?

Dunning Kruger Affect 10-23-2015 01:35 PM


Originally Posted by black roadster (Post 1277802)
TDR is a trademark of Track Dog Racing. Tuning Done Right is in no way affiliated with TDR or Track Dog Racing.

Could have fooled me. :hatecat:

patsmx5 10-23-2015 01:56 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1277871)
how does downshifting make up for the lack of about 50rwtq on all these plots?

It doesn't. Average power from 5K to 7K is lower than a turbo car with the same peak power, no doubt. Turbo car would thus be faster.

Still it's a nice setup, but it's not a positive displacement SC, and it's not a turbo. As mentioned this setup would be very easy on the rods, 250whp with this would last forever since it's not making the torque that bends rods.

mgeoffriau 10-23-2015 02:15 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1277871)
how does downshifting make up for the lack of about 50rwtq on all these plots?

I dunno, I'm mostly just trying to rile you up, since you've been even more relentlessly negative than usual.

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1445624153

Braineack 10-23-2015 02:21 PM

ive actually been restrained...

Lincoln Logs 10-23-2015 02:44 PM


Originally Posted by shuiend (Post 1277865)
Not bend rods?

This is why I went for a Rotrex.


Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 1277883)
It doesn't. Average power from 5K to 7K is lower than a turbo car with the same peak power, no doubt. Turbo car would thus be faster.

Still it's a nice setup, but it's not a positive displacement SC, and it's not a turbo. As mentioned this setup would be very easy on the rods, 250whp with this would last forever since it's not making the torque that bends rods.

The reality is you NEED a 6 speed to have decent gearing to keep it on boil. I went back to a 5 speed (for shift feel) and I regret it. The Rotrex needs a short ratio box to keep it in the power band.

AnnorexicRoadster 10-23-2015 02:53 PM

Many people are willing to trade loss of midrange torque for greater reliability, OEM cold starts, easier install and fully removable with ease.

Megasquirt is great if you love to tinker and will take a lot more time to run as smooth as OEM. Can it be done? Sure can, but you will invest either many $$ in tuning fees or many hours learning the system. Not everyone has the time and patience to become a diy tuner.

Personally I will give up 15-20 HP any day over having to deal with megasquirt again. Been there done that to me and many other people its just not worth the extra hassle.

Dunning Kruger Affect 10-23-2015 02:56 PM

Many people are willing to assume a lot of stuff and blindly trust some half-ass compromise versus learning and doing things the proper way... and then enthusiastically defend their awful decision to not put in the effort.

robertcope 10-23-2015 02:58 PM


Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect (Post 1277905)
Many people are willing to assume a lot of stuff and blindly trust some half-ass compromise versus learning and doing things the proper way... and then enthusiastically defend their awful decision to not put in the effort.

I'm sure you sew your own clothes, crafted your own watch, constructed your own home, etc, too, right? Oh? You compromised on those things, did you?

robert

18psi 10-23-2015 03:07 PM

No, I bet he had professionals do it. You know, just like if you took your megasquirted car to someone that knew what they were doing, paid money, and drove the well running car home.

It's a compromise. You give up adjustment range, and better precision and control while in boost, for those "oem starts".

Next person that tells us Mazda spent millions of dollars and countless hours calibrating the OEM ecu needs to go drive a stock MSM.

PS: I actually had throttle response and driveability on my MSM better than OEM. That's gonna blow your mind.

AnnorexicRoadster 10-23-2015 03:08 PM


Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect (Post 1277905)
Many people are willing to assume a lot of stuff and blindly trust some half-ass compromise versus learning and doing things the proper way... and then enthusiastically defend their awful decision to not put in the effort.

Some people rather spend time driving their car then countless hours in front of a laptop. Will the fuel curve be as nice? No. But you will still double horsepower vs stock and as long as the timing and fuel are within a safe margin then they will be more then happy with the compromise.

Given the rotrex can run with much higher timing and leaner AFR's before knock compared to a turbo a simple timing card though not perfect should be a safe, and simple solution.

18psi 10-23-2015 03:14 PM


Originally Posted by AnnorexicRoadster (Post 1277909)

Given the rotrex can run with much higher timing and leaner AFR's before knock compared to a turbo a simple timing card though not perfect should be a safe, and simple solution.

What allows you to make such a stupid claim?

Can you link me to the thread/blog where this was tested and proven?

Originally Posted by AnnorexicRoadster (Post 1277909)
Some people rather spend time driving their car then countless hours in front of a laptop. Will the fuel curve be as nice?

You know you have the option to pay someone that knows what they're doing to tune it right?

AnnorexicRoadster 10-23-2015 03:16 PM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277908)
No, I bet he had professionals do it. You know, just like if you took your megasquirted car to someone that knew what they were doing, paid money, and drove the well running car home.

The amount of time it takes to fine tune idle, cold start, and power maps to all run as smooth as OEM takes time even with a knowledgeable tuner. Factor in that the standalone costs more then a power card, then you will spend more time on the dyno and road fine tuning it which equates to more $. It's an investment alot of people rather not make.

If the powercard works within the power goals of the consumer it's the easier choice. It's also a much easier option for people that live in areas where obd2 emissions tests exist. Also having the ability to read OBD2 codes is a extra bonus feature you retain with a piggyback.

18psi 10-23-2015 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by AnnorexicRoadster (Post 1277915)
The amount of time it takes to fine tune idle, cold start, and power maps to all run as smooth as OEM takes time even with a knowledgeable tuner. Factor in that the standalone costs more then a power card, then you will spend more time on the dyno and road fine tuning it which equates to more $. It's an investment alot of people rather not make.

If the powercard works within the power goals of the consumer it's the easier choice. It's also a much easier option for people that live in areas where obd2 emissions tests exist. Also having the ability to read OBD2 codes is a extra bonus feature you retain with a piggyback.

1) some people drink craft beer and others bud light. it's an investment they're not willing to make
2) paying more money for a better outcome makes sense even to my 2 year old. the only time it's ok to spend more money and still have band aidz are for people in crazy states like CA that need that CARB sticker.

the OBD2 and smog/inspection portion of this argument, as well as ease of install and simplicity are your only legs to stand on. I'll give you those. Oh and the "easier on the engine due to making low torque" part too.

patsmx5 10-23-2015 03:25 PM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277913)
What allows you to make such a stupid claim?

Can you link me to the thread/blog where this was tested and proven?


You know you have the option to pay someone that knows what they're doing to tune it right?

No he's right. Rotrex isn't making as much torque in the midrange where knock is most common, thus it's less likely to knock. That part is true. Whether that is an advantage is up for debate.... But it is true, less power, less chance for knock. Also SC setups have lower backpressure, so less internal EGR at full load, lower temps in the combustion chamber during combustion, so again less chance for knock.

That said if you guys want to have a pissing contest on whether a perfectly tuned standalone is better than piggy backs, yall should go do that somewhere else. I swear I thought this we did that like 10 years ago.

patsmx5 10-23-2015 03:31 PM


Originally Posted by Lincoln Logs (Post 1277899)
This is why I went for a Rotrex.



The reality is you NEED a 6 speed to have decent gearing to keep it on boil. I went back to a 5 speed (for shift feel) and I regret it. The Rotrex needs a short ratio box to keep it in the power band.

I could understand that based on the dyno chart.

18psi 10-23-2015 03:39 PM


Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 1277921)
No he's right. Rotrex isn't making as much torque in the midrange where knock is most common, thus it's less likely to knock. That part is true. Whether that is an advantage is up for debate.... But it is true, less power, less chance for knock. Also SC setups have lower backpressure, so less internal EGR at full load, lower temps in the combustion chamber during combustion, so again less chance for knock.

That said if you guys want to have a pissing contest on whether a perfectly tuned standalone is better than piggy backs, yall should go do that somewhere else. I swear I thought this we did that like 10 years ago.

he wasn't talking about making less power. he was talking about taking leaner afr's and more timing before encountering knock.

I'll decide when to post here and when to post elsewhere. Thanks

Dunning Kruger Affect 10-23-2015 03:40 PM


Originally Posted by robertcope (Post 1277906)
I'm sure you sew your own clothes, crafted your own watch, constructed your own home, etc, too, right? Oh? You compromised on those things, did you?

robert

Way to move the goal posts and make a false equivalency; I was making the classic argument of something working vs something working right, and you decided to try to reframe it. D+, see me after class.


Originally Posted by AnnorexicRoadster (Post 1277909)
Some people rather spend time driving their car then countless hours in front of a laptop. Will the fuel curve be as nice? No. But you will still double horsepower vs stock and as long as the timing and fuel are within a safe margin then they will be more then happy with the compromise.

Given the rotrex can run with much higher timing and leaner AFR's before knock compared to a turbo a simple timing card though not perfect should be a safe, and simple solution.

Like I said, people are more than enthusiastic to defend their decision to not put in effort. Thanks for proving my point. :party:

Like quite literally if your argument is "It's hard and I don't understand it", and someone takes the time to show you resources and help you through it, and then you still go "But it's hard and I don't understand it", you're being a stick in the mud. Not to point fingers or turn this into a helldump, but there are a lot of straight up "dumb" people who have figured out how to install and run a Megasquirt. Patching in a Powercard or whatever is literally 90% of the work of going to a standalone; it's like going on a 6 hour road trip and at 5 hours in you declare "man, I don't feel like driving for another hour, I'm going to turn around and drive 5 hours home". No one is stopping you, its your decision, but you're not convincing anyone when you explain why.

cyotani 10-23-2015 04:09 PM

Does anyone know if they will produce a semi DIY kit?

SC, bracket and pulley system, oiling and cooling system etc?

I'd like to reuse my megasquirt, injectors, etc. and do my own IC and piping set up to save some pennies.

AnnorexicRoadster 10-23-2015 04:24 PM


Originally Posted by 18psi (Post 1277929)
he wasn't talking about making less power. he was talking about taking leaner afr's and more timing before encountering knock.

I'll decide when to post here and when to post elsewhere. Thanks

I'm not going to do your homework for you. It's also the reason why you can run 10:1 compression motors (look on 949's site they recommend 10:1 for a fully built motor for rotrex)

significantly less back pressure, colder intake temps for same volume of air moved, much more progressive power curve. All these equate to a more det resistant setup.

18psi 10-23-2015 04:35 PM

It's not homework it's you pulling stuff out of your butt and calling it a fact

aidandj 10-23-2015 04:38 PM

Thats how I got through school


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands