My next project
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 14
My next project
In typical Pipefather masochistic style, I have decided to inflict upon myself a new challenge: Build the ultimate DIY coilover setup for a miata.
Why?
I got tired of looking for a decent used set of miata-specific shocks and decided to build my own for 1/10 th the cost. The goal is to match the performance of high-end shocks like the Tein Flex and FM AFCO, particularly the latter, as the (claimed) suitability to road racing + street use is intriguing.
The primary ingredient is this:
These are a set of non-adjustable Carrera shocks used in circle-track asphalt racing (basically a NASCAR feeder series).
They are a twin-tube design and have an aluminum threaded body. Travel is 9" front and 7" rear. Weight is 3-4 lbs each. The shock bodies are almost a perfect match for the miata (0.5" shorter than OEM in front, and 1.25" longer in back). The ends have 1/2" heims so custom mounts will be needed.
Oh, and did I mention that the shocks are revalveable at home??
The price I got them for is jaw-dropping: under $180 shipped for all four. Obviously used but that's killer anyway you look at it!
The next 3-4 months will be spent calculating and street-testing optimum spring rates, bumpstop rates, ride heights, shock valving etc. Track testing will be done next season when I prepare my car for NASA TT competition.
I am no expert on this, so I hope the gurus here can give me some food for thought. All comments/jabs welcome.
Why?
I got tired of looking for a decent used set of miata-specific shocks and decided to build my own for 1/10 th the cost. The goal is to match the performance of high-end shocks like the Tein Flex and FM AFCO, particularly the latter, as the (claimed) suitability to road racing + street use is intriguing.
The primary ingredient is this:
These are a set of non-adjustable Carrera shocks used in circle-track asphalt racing (basically a NASCAR feeder series).
They are a twin-tube design and have an aluminum threaded body. Travel is 9" front and 7" rear. Weight is 3-4 lbs each. The shock bodies are almost a perfect match for the miata (0.5" shorter than OEM in front, and 1.25" longer in back). The ends have 1/2" heims so custom mounts will be needed.
Oh, and did I mention that the shocks are revalveable at home??
The price I got them for is jaw-dropping: under $180 shipped for all four. Obviously used but that's killer anyway you look at it!
The next 3-4 months will be spent calculating and street-testing optimum spring rates, bumpstop rates, ride heights, shock valving etc. Track testing will be done next season when I prepare my car for NASA TT competition.
I am no expert on this, so I hope the gurus here can give me some food for thought. All comments/jabs welcome.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 14
Thanks. I have no idea what they are originally valved for, but the guy I bought them from had 300/175L and 300/185R. I dont intend going above 300/225 if I can help it. Perches are setup for 2.5" which means there's a motherload of springs out there to choose from.
#5
street duty first, then track - correct? Because your street spring rates will hurt you on the track IF you plan on competing seriously.
Since you're going to all the trouble, you need to work out flipped mounting (body mounts to chassis, rod mounts to control arm) so you can minimize your unsprung weight. Did you get a cheap MIG yet? ;-)
Carrera was popular way back when I started racing with the IT crowd. AAMOF a pal of mine had inverted mounted carreras (looked just like yours) on his ITA crx.
Since you're going to all the trouble, you need to work out flipped mounting (body mounts to chassis, rod mounts to control arm) so you can minimize your unsprung weight. Did you get a cheap MIG yet? ;-)
Carrera was popular way back when I started racing with the IT crowd. AAMOF a pal of mine had inverted mounted carreras (looked just like yours) on his ITA crx.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 14
No but I got a job as vehicle test and development engineer starting september. The proto shop there has every imaginable piece of equipment you can think of. 5-axis mill, CNC lathe, press, MIG, TIG, spot welder, plasma cutter, shear brake, you name it its there. I only need to learn how to use the welding equipment.
500th post BTW
Good to know they were used in road racing. Gives me some confidence. My level of seriousness with competition is more to develop myself technically, not to win the race. I want to eventually build and race my own DSR / B-Mod car.
Flipped mounting, hmmm. They're quite light already, will that make THAT much of a difference on a 2000 lb car with an already low unsprung weight? Because they have 1/2" shafts which can be easily adapted to stock upper mounts, which, IIRC, are 12 mm??
500th post BTW
Flipped mounting, hmmm. They're quite light already, will that make THAT much of a difference on a 2000 lb car with an already low unsprung weight? Because they have 1/2" shafts which can be easily adapted to stock upper mounts, which, IIRC, are 12 mm??
#8
On the inverted mounting- my assumption is that the body weighs in at more than your rod. Which I'll be it does. Given your new work environment and tool set, it would practicably be irresponsible of you to NOT mount them that way IF it's the proper way to mount them for a competitive advantage. Not so much for you to win the event, but for you to fulfill your duty as a vehicle test and development engineer. But alas, they're your shocks and your project.
#10
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
On the inverted mounting- my assumption is that the body weighs in at more than your rod. Which I'll be it does. Given your new work environment and tool set, it would practicably be irresponsible of you to NOT mount them that way IF it's the proper way to mount them for a competitive advantage. Not so much for you to win the event, but for you to fulfill your duty as a vehicle test and development engineer. But alas, they're your shocks and your project.
from: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/car-suspension2.htm
Edit: plus Pipe's shocks are aluminum. they already weigh about half what a stock shock weighs I bet.
#11
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,079
On the inverted mounting- my assumption is that the body weighs in at more than your rod. Which I'll be it does. Given your new work environment and tool set, it would practicably be irresponsible of you to NOT mount them that way IF it's the proper way to mount them for a competitive advantage. Not so much for you to win the event, but for you to fulfill your duty as a vehicle test and development engineer. But alas, they're your shocks and your project.
not to mention it would probably be easier to cut off the brackets and weld on body mounts to the body of the shocks....
#12
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Thanks. I have no idea what they are originally valved for, but the guy I bought them from had 300/175L and 300/185R. I dont intend going above 300/225 if I can help it. Perches are setup for 2.5" which means there's a motherload of springs out there to choose from.
http://www.bluecoilspring.com/
Matt
#13
Ok, missed the twin tube part. OPM/Carrera modified the shock to work inverted- which was probably a monotube in this case. It wasn't a threaded body either, since they're illegal.
The point of inverted mounting is taking advantage of an installation at "no" (or little) additional costs for a benefit. It's the cumulation of those efforts that pay off IMO.
The point of inverted mounting is taking advantage of an installation at "no" (or little) additional costs for a benefit. It's the cumulation of those efforts that pay off IMO.
Last edited by m2cupcar; 08-20-2008 at 04:06 PM.
#14
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Ok, missed the twin tube part. OPM/Carrera modified the shock to work inverted- which was probably a monotube in this case. It wasn't a threaded body either, since they're illegal.
The point of inverted mounting is taking advantage of an installation at "no" (or little) additional costs for a benefit. It's the cumulation of those efforts that pay off IMO.
The point of inverted mounting is taking advantage of an installation at "no" (or little) additional costs for a benefit. It's the cumulation of those efforts that pay off IMO.
I recall from my Advance Design days that the aluminum shock itself was very light compared to the spring and steel NB top mount. even with oil.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 14
y8s is right, carrera do not recommend mounting these shocks inverted. i'm thinking i'll just slap on a set of bored-out stock top mounts, shim the bottom heim down to 12 mm (control arm bolt IS 12 mm, right???) and be all set to throw them on there.
i will end up buying those off of you. give me a few weeks, i am moving to my new "life" (house in the suburbs, job, dog etc ) so I dont have a stable address right now.
i will end up buying those off of you. give me a few weeks, i am moving to my new "life" (house in the suburbs, job, dog etc ) so I dont have a stable address right now.
#18
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
why not take a stock mount and weld in something to mount at the heim joint, through the body of the car, and win at life? I really like where this is going. You could even make the heim mounting assembly off the stock mounts, and put the mount under the car, but the bodies are probably too long for that.
After riding in cars with tein and moton dampers using 550/400lb springs, if the valving is right you can be comfortable on the street. Good luck figuring that out, but you can probably steal data from FCM.
Where can you get valves?
wow, if we could figure out which valves to use, this could be really, realy cool.
edit: search on ebay for "shock body" and tons of cheap stuff comes up. I don't see why a little fab work can't save us thousands. I was trying to prepare myself to buy the Afco's or something in that caliber, but I might save a ton of cash.
Afco has cheap close-out **** too:
http://www.afabcorp.com/AFCO_Dynatec...ode=cs_springs
After riding in cars with tein and moton dampers using 550/400lb springs, if the valving is right you can be comfortable on the street. Good luck figuring that out, but you can probably steal data from FCM.
Where can you get valves?
wow, if we could figure out which valves to use, this could be really, realy cool.
edit: search on ebay for "shock body" and tons of cheap stuff comes up. I don't see why a little fab work can't save us thousands. I was trying to prepare myself to buy the Afco's or something in that caliber, but I might save a ton of cash.
Afco has cheap close-out **** too:
http://www.afabcorp.com/AFCO_Dynatec...ode=cs_springs
Last edited by hustler; 08-21-2008 at 11:42 PM.
#19
street duty first, then track - correct? Because your street spring rates will hurt you on the track IF you plan on competing seriously.
Since you're going to all the trouble, you need to work out flipped mounting (body mounts to chassis, rod mounts to control arm) so you can minimize your unsprung weight. Did you get a cheap MIG yet? ;-)
Carrera was popular way back when I started racing with the IT crowd. AAMOF a pal of mine had inverted mounted carreras (looked just like yours) on his ITA crx.
Since you're going to all the trouble, you need to work out flipped mounting (body mounts to chassis, rod mounts to control arm) so you can minimize your unsprung weight. Did you get a cheap MIG yet? ;-)
Carrera was popular way back when I started racing with the IT crowd. AAMOF a pal of mine had inverted mounted carreras (looked just like yours) on his ITA crx.
At that price grab 2 sets!
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 14
why not take a stock mount and weld in something to mount at the heim joint, through the body of the car, and win at life? I really like where this is going. You could even make the heim mounting assembly off the stock mounts, and put the mount under the car, but the bodies are probably too long for that.
there's several places that revalve circle track shocks. i will contact one of them with an appropriate miata-specific dyno curve and ask if they can replicate it for me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post