Euro 1,6 99-00 @11PSI - shouldn't this be more?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2010, 03:26 AM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Zaphod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Schwarzenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,554
Total Cats: 101
Default Euro 1,6 99-00 @11PSI - shouldn't this be more?

Hi folks,

I went to the dyno lately with my setup:

Euro 1,6 NB (99-00)
GT2560R
2,5" exhaust, metal catalytic converter 200cell
MS2 (DIYPNP) running sequential injection
EBC through MS2 - with the new 3.0.3u code @ ~10-11PSI (170kPa with 98kPa atmospheric pressure)

Weather was total crap for dynoing... ~38°C = 100°F

This is the dynosheet I got - the values are uncorrected.



The sheet shows 133.5 wheel-kW which equals ~179 wheel-hp.
uncorrected.

The DIN correction here is:

correction factor = (1.013 mbar / atmospheric pressure [mbar]) * ((273 + temperature [° C]) / 293)

Which in my case goes like:
correction factor = (1.013 mbar / 980 mbar) * (273 + 38°C / 293) = 1.097

So the corrected value should be 179 * 1.097= 196.39 wheel-hp

(Would you confirm this?)

This is what my datalog of the run looks like:



I dont like the spool-up I see - the old T25 gave me 10 PSI @* 3000 RPM - what could cause this?

Other than that I would like to here some comments.
Zaphod is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 03:47 AM
  #2  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

10psi, low-reading dyno?, 100*F, 200whp sounds pretty close. Add in a 2.5" catted exhaust and it's very believable. I made 217whp on a Mustang dyno with a '99 longblock, but that was with a 3" exhaust and more boost.
Savington is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 06:21 AM
  #3  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Zaphod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Schwarzenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,554
Total Cats: 101
Default

Thanks for your judgement!

Any idea about the slow / late spool?
Zaphod is offline  
Old 07-30-2010, 04:43 PM
  #4  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Nothing specific. Check for leaks, make sure there are no exhaust leaks. Give us a more detailed spool profile, boost vs. RPM every 200rpm from 2500 to 4000.
Savington is offline  
Old 07-30-2010, 04:51 PM
  #5  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

looks about right to me too man.
with a better flowing exhaust setup at a less hot temperature id expect around 230whp

you have a 1.6 and a fairly small turbo. those numbers are not bad
18psi is offline  
Old 07-30-2010, 05:11 PM
  #6  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

I would have guessed based on your description at about 180 whp, so seems pretty strong to me.
Euro 1.6 motors tend to have very weak cam profiles. Keep in mind that the 99's over here have 239 more cc's of displacement and more aggressive cams. Sure, my car makes about 10% more power at the same boost, but it's not a fair comparison. However your power is right where we normally see a 1.6 with a GT2560r running the same boost.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 07-31-2010, 11:59 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Zaphod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Schwarzenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,554
Total Cats: 101
Default

Thanks! Nice to here - and see that I am in the right ballpark.
Zaphod is offline  
Old 07-31-2010, 01:01 PM
  #8  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

I saw "99" and automatically thought 1.8. Yeah, those are great numbers for a 1.6 with a 2560R at 10-11psi.
Savington is offline  
Old 10-03-2010, 05:02 PM
  #9  
I'm Miserable!
 
user 8392's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 16
Total Cats: 0
Default

I don't think it is. Only 8psi here but rated at 170whp+
user 8392 is offline  
Old 10-03-2010, 05:05 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southlake,Texas
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 15
Default

Originally Posted by overst33r
I don't think it is. Only 8psi here but rated at 170whp+
How do you know?
Bond is offline  
Old 10-03-2010, 05:06 PM
  #11  
I'm Miserable!
 
user 8392's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 16
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
How do you know?
I don't know for sure, just judging from trap speed when I went to the track. I admit I'm a
user 8392 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MiataGarage
Engine Performance
5
09-29-2015 11:04 PM
ericwh
Miata parts for sale/trade
3
09-24-2015 07:47 AM
curly
MEGAsquirt
11
09-22-2015 11:54 AM
Dobzeh
MEGAsquirt
2
09-10-2015 06:34 AM
ConnorSzcz
ECUs and Tuning
0
09-04-2015 02:46 PM



Quick Reply: Euro 1,6 99-00 @11PSI - shouldn't this be more?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM.