General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

New Tein Tophats (Information & Feedback)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2008, 12:50 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
danscreations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 257
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by thesnowboarder
Ide be happy to test fit them on my 90 with 6k rear springs at a 12.0 hub to fender gap. On my flex's i have the shock body shortened as much as possible with the spring "preload" setting its ride height. Im about 2.0 of droop travel, right there on the boarder of being on the bumps all day, yet i only feel them on the freeway on hard bumps.
Your on the list when I flip the OK switch. I might just have you be the first so we can see how they're going to work on the flex.

So confused talked to several Flex owners. A few said they had NO negative preload; so they obviously got the ride height they wanted by adjusting the bottom collar. Then I've heard guys at about 12.5" ride height with the bottom adjustment maxed out which would make you have to adjust the spring collars down 1" for 11.5" ride height (equals 1" of negative preload), 1.5" for 11" ride height (equals 1.5" of negative preload).

You happen to know how low you can go by just adjusting the bottom collar all they way up (maxing it out for as short as it can be)?
danscreations is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 12:57 PM
  #22  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
johndoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,970
Total Cats: 1
Default

[QUOTE=danscreations;243546]
Then I've heard guys at about 12.5" ride height with the bottom adjustment maxed out which would make you have to adjust the spring collars down 1" for 11.5" ride height (equals 1" of negative preload), 1.5" for 11" ride height (equals 1.5" of negative preload).
QUOTE]

they must be doing something wrong, though the rears are more limited than the front as to how far they can be lowered. Also you can go with shorter springs to keep from having negative preload with lower heights. That way you can screw the shock further down without the lock collar and spring collars interfering.
johndoe is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 02:50 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
danscreations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 257
Total Cats: 0
Default

[QUOTE=johndoe;243554]
Originally Posted by danscreations
Then I've heard guys at about 12.5" ride height with the bottom adjustment maxed out which would make you have to adjust the spring collars down 1" for 11.5" ride height (equals 1" of negative preload), 1.5" for 11" ride height (equals 1.5" of negative preload).
QUOTE]

they must be doing something wrong, though the rears are more limited than the front as to how far they can be lowered. Also you can go with shorter springs to keep from having negative preload with lower heights. That way you can screw the shock further down without the lock collar and spring collars interfering.
Makes sense same thing the tophats will do just with the springs instead of extending the mounting point.

No one got horribly specific when saying they were out of adjustment on the bottom. Figured they bottomed the shock body on the inside of the bottom mount instead of interferance of the two adjustment points (bottom and spring collars).
danscreations is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:02 AM
  #24  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
danscreations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 257
Total Cats: 0
Default

More Pics...









danscreations is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 01:36 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
speedf50's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 749
Total Cats: 0
Default

So are you making these?

Speaking as a cheap *** (sorry but there are quite a few of us here) would this provide any more travel than the ISC topmounts? Or is it just less ghetto, holds the spring, and uses a spherical bearing instead of the NB shock bushings(I think the ISC uses those)?

I still think these are amazingly cool and if I had the money right now I would love to get them.

Another question... how much travel do you think these would have over NB mounts on teins? My current setup is SS with NB stockers, but it looks as if these would give even more travel, and even more on top of that with the use of the 22mm bumpstop.
speedf50 is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 01:55 AM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
thesnowboarder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Incline Village, NV
Posts: 2,034
Total Cats: 5
Default

Originally Posted by danscreations
Your on the list when I flip the OK switch. I might just have you be the first so we can see how they're going to work on the flex.

So confused talked to several Flex owners. A few said they had NO negative preload; so they obviously got the ride height they wanted by adjusting the bottom collar. Then I've heard guys at about 12.5" ride height with the bottom adjustment maxed out which would make you have to adjust the spring collars down 1" for 11.5" ride height (equals 1" of negative preload), 1.5" for 11" ride height (equals 1.5" of negative preload).

You happen to know how low you can go by just adjusting the bottom collar all they way up (maxing it out for as short as it can be)?
In order to get the flex anywhere near 12.75 in the rear the spring collar (preload) must be lowered. I have my bottom collar all the way up (meaning as low as possible) and the ride height set to 12.0 in the rear. Droop travel is at 2 inch's. Any droop travel above 1.5 and your on the bump stops. Which i am. If these did the trick and kept me off at my desired height while keeping my droop travel to a minimum i wouldn't hesitate to buy them.
thesnowboarder is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 10:02 AM
  #27  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

still dont think the flex need these. there's enough adjustment range in the body adjustment to send the wheels into the fenders at the same time as you fully compress the bumpstops.
y8s is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 04:58 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
dc2696's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
For the price, I wouldn't produce these. Besides already having similar products on the market,

Ya like the $35 ones I'm rockin now, best buy ever (ISC)
dc2696 is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 07:04 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
speedf50's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 749
Total Cats: 0
Default

So do your ISC mounts give more travel than the stock NB mounts would?
speedf50 is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 07:23 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
slutz4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 566
Total Cats: 2
Default

the isc mounts work, there just a bit crude if youd ask me.
slutz4 is offline  
Old 05-07-2008, 12:33 PM
  #31  
Newb
 
ashC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Total Cats: 0
Default

Can someone else provide me with some info on these ISC mounts?
ashC is offline  
Old 05-07-2008, 12:40 PM
  #32  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

Originally Posted by ashC
Can someone else provide me with some info on these ISC mounts?
You can find them here: http://www.iscracing.net/Miata_suspension.htm
cjernigan is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:26 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
danscreations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 257
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mmmjesse
Looking forward to getting a pair out of the next batch.
Soon, Soon... sent you an email today!
danscreations is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mazdaspeeder
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
21
10-03-2015 06:45 PM
Voltwings
Cars for sale/trade
0
09-27-2015 06:40 PM
d k
Race Prep
44
09-15-2015 10:59 AM
compuw22c
MEGAsquirt
0
09-14-2015 06:08 PM



Quick Reply: New Tein Tophats (Information & Feedback)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.