3" Downpipe with BEGI/FMII?
#21
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Haarlem ,the Netherlands
Posts: 453
Total Cats: 0
Yep, but even in turbo setups the exhaust gasses must be routed the best way out. That means: the bigger the exhaust diameter gets the more youll have to push the gasses out with more gasses...
To create velosity in the gasses you step up in diameter...
This way the expantion off the gasses forces itself out off the exhaust...
To create velosity in the gasses you step up in diameter...
This way the expantion off the gasses forces itself out off the exhaust...
#22
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,893
Total Cats: 399
Uhh...so? Sell it to Eric.
Damn stagnation and flow eddys. haha.
Paul's is 3" "bell-mouth"; 3" pipe smooshed oval right at the turbine flange. I don't know how much power or spool he'd make with a nice divorced WG DP using a smooth trumpet-horn-like transition at the turbine outlet. Whatever increases are there, they aren't worth the extra time or cost, IMHO. Unless you want to be badass and impress everyone with fancy words like stagnation and flow eddys.
EDIT: Any exhaust will "work". Me saying I built this XX times and it works great is fine and all, doesn't mean another setup won't work better. Christ I'm sure a 2.25" crush bent pipe would work fine for most people.
just dont do a 3" pipe connected to the outlet flange without some transition. you'll get stagnation and flow eddys.
my dream downpipe (if it would fit) would be about 6" of transition exactly matching the turbine outlet to 3 inches and then 3" the rest of the way. I think Paul's is very close to that.
my dream downpipe (if it would fit) would be about 6" of transition exactly matching the turbine outlet to 3 inches and then 3" the rest of the way. I think Paul's is very close to that.
Damn stagnation and flow eddys. haha.
Paul's is 3" "bell-mouth"; 3" pipe smooshed oval right at the turbine flange. I don't know how much power or spool he'd make with a nice divorced WG DP using a smooth trumpet-horn-like transition at the turbine outlet. Whatever increases are there, they aren't worth the extra time or cost, IMHO. Unless you want to be badass and impress everyone with fancy words like stagnation and flow eddys.
EDIT: Any exhaust will "work". Me saying I built this XX times and it works great is fine and all, doesn't mean another setup won't work better. Christ I'm sure a 2.25" crush bent pipe would work fine for most people.
#28
4" ftmfw!!1!!!
flow>volume, however, best results are if you have both.
ex: If your DP flange is 2.5" diameter, then the ideal thing if you must use an exhaust would be a transition from 2.5" to whatever your exhaust is (3" more than likely).
The length of the transition will be whatever you have room for, but it should be right off the turbine housing for the best results. This way you have a smooth expanding exit right off the turbine wheel that promotes the gases to accelerate as they come out. This will help spool and efficiency.
flow>volume, however, best results are if you have both.
ex: If your DP flange is 2.5" diameter, then the ideal thing if you must use an exhaust would be a transition from 2.5" to whatever your exhaust is (3" more than likely).
The length of the transition will be whatever you have room for, but it should be right off the turbine housing for the best results. This way you have a smooth expanding exit right off the turbine wheel that promotes the gases to accelerate as they come out. This will help spool and efficiency.
#30
Yes, that is why I am noy buying anything off the shelf and making my own ****, for this very reason. I have no AC or PS and can place my turbo anywhere i want, within reason, so Im gonna place the turbo where i want it and mock the mani/DP according to my location, simple enough. Plus I found this perfect pipe at DH Griffin, it is 3" with a 45* mandrel bend which turns into a reducer about 4" long, should be perfect for what I want.
#31
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
My point is to be as close to 'no exhaust' as possible. Providing as much space for the gases to expand as quickly as they can allows them to get the F outta the turbine wheels way.
Yes there is an exhaust... but the idea still applies in a sense.
Regardless... I've used it on my last 2 setups without issue. Pieces to flare just waste space to me.
Yes there is an exhaust... but the idea still applies in a sense.
Regardless... I've used it on my last 2 setups without issue. Pieces to flare just waste space to me.
if you've ever been toobing or canoeing or kayaking on a flowing river, you'd know that the river stops dead behind rocks or other large objects in the water. you can sit there all day because the flow of the river is pushing you back up against the rock.
the situation with gases is slightly different but similar. you generate backflow turbulence.
If you dig through engineering books on pipe flow, there's actually an end correction factor for transitional flow like that. Because the gas is going directly from a high pressure to a low pressure, it stagnates.
it's basically aerodynamics, only the flow is on the inside instead of the outside. that's why the backs of streamlined objects aren't flat blocks but smooth down to a point. the inverse of that is your ideal downpipe.
I was trying to find a nice graphic but I can't... I'll have to dig out the fluids book at home.
#33
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
It doesn't expand due to cooling, but because gasses expand to fill their container. As the gas velocity slows, you also have it expand to reduce the amount of energy it takes to push it out of the exhaust.
#34
When I was getting my diff mount welded in the Miata, gas starting coming out of one of my disconnected fuel lines because of the heat from the welder.
What am I missing here?
Frank
#35
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
haha. whoops. what i meant to say was the velocity decreases as it cools. you wanna go bigger volume, so when the exhaust starts to slow it's easy for it to find it's way to the low pressure zone. if not, the exhaust will backup in the smaller pipes and start to create backpressure.....less energy wasted pushing against the exhaust, is more energy to push down pistons.
sorry bout that.
sorry bout that.
#38
https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/showthread.php?t=10096
Admittedly, I do enjoy that.
#39
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,893
Total Cats: 399
Because you were willing to pay more for the (probably) little gain over a 3" bellmouth. Maybe your downpipe does make a lot more than a bellmouth would, I don't know; you'd have to compare them back to back on the same car/same setup otherwise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM