Notices
Aerodynamics Splitters, spoilers, and all the aero advice you can handle.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aerodynamic Discussion Thread

Old Aug 1, 2013 | 10:52 PM
  #401  
motormechanic's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 187
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by doward
I assume you mean the front wheel.
So would you place the tabs on the rear edge of the front bumper, so the vortices would smooth flow over the spinning wheel and tire, rearwards.
correct. No, place them behind the wheel, so turbulent flow from the wheel is smoothed out as it joins the flow on the side of the car.
Old Aug 1, 2013 | 10:56 PM
  #402  
M.Adamovits's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 323
Total Cats: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Supe
Only one way to find out. Keep in mind, the Peugot 208 T16 and Monster's Suzukis both used the same setup, no break/outlet in the crevice. If its doing more harm than good, I'll yank it off. Fortunately, I've got somewhere in the neighborhood of 400-450 HP and only see 4th gear a few times, so I've got enough torque and rear gear to offset some drag that I otherwise wouldn't want at a higher speed course.
This completes the picture a little better. I always seem to consider things at my low HP Miata frame of mind.

At 400hp and lower speed courses you should be able to over come some drag.

As the ridiculously powerful hill climb cars do. Though noticing this video shows a Focus where the splitter sills are spaced out at the rear.
Old Aug 3, 2013 | 09:24 PM
  #403  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

Here are some flow

LaFerrari



Hennessy Venom GT





Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-ct_laferrari_aerodynamics_03_surface_pressure_coefficient_zps255bf8af.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-2009090209065346_zpsfbe0eb94.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-2009090209064843_zps442e8867.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-2009090209065648_zpsdb4a14a4.jpg  
Old Aug 17, 2013 | 12:59 PM
  #404  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Any thoughts or photos of radiator duct work sealed to the hood that has side exits?

I'm mocking up my radiator mounts now with the new front frame rail setup. I would REALLY like to be able to run an air cleaner with my motor, and to do so, I need to center mount a forward facing hood scoop. What I don't want is that nice warm radiator air being forced up the hood and right into the mouth of my throttle body, so I'm thinking of making a wire frame and fiberglassing the outlet ducts, so that it dumps more towards the sides of the hood/closer to the fenders.

Any thoughts?
Old Aug 17, 2013 | 10:12 PM
  #405  
Handy Man's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
From: Houston
Default

That could work... but I find it hard to believe that the only way to run an air filter is with a hood scoop. Hood scoops suck unless they are mounted sky high which is problematic for visibility.

I'd think the ideal solution would be to run a ram air, or at least cold air, hose from the front of the car to your intake rather than trying to suck air from the low pressure area of the hood, an area that is much better suited to exhausting radiator flow.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 08:35 AM
  #406  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Route the air from the the front somewhere under hte fog lights to the filter, dont waste ur time with a hood scoop. Odds are if you toss a hood scoop it will be from a vacuum area.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 10:31 AM
  #407  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

It's largely a hood clearance issue. I can't fit a bonnet/intake elbow without cutting the hood, same goes for a circular air cleaner. Don't have the clearance with the current firewall setup, fuel rails, and distributor to run a cowl induction setup. I may use the second set of front light holes for some sort of air inlet, but with a v8 and a ton of other underhood crap, space is at a premium.

I'm also beginning to have my questions about the accuracy of that notorious RX7 air pressure diagram. I have a TII hood now, and last time I towed the thing, there was so much pressure at the inlet that I couldn't keep the 3M tape over the mouth of the thing, it kept getting blown in.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 12:49 PM
  #408  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

Can you run an intake to the high pressure air at the base of the wind shield like this but bigger for your V8
http://img470.imageshack.us/img470/9008/pict0393vi8.jpg
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 07:17 PM
  #409  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Can't do it on account of firewall space. Passenger side is occupied by wiper motor, brake lines, ignition coil, fuel rails, EFI harness. Driver's side is fuel rails, booster, clutch master, brake master. I could put a rear facing "cowl" scoop on it so to speak, but would have a heck of a time trying to get it to seal to the TB.

Sadly, I have to have SOME sort of scoop or elbow on my hood. The throttle body sticks up past the hood line, as I have a large single plane intake. Making things even more complicated from an air intake perspective is that I have a strut tower bar that can't be removed (I've removed a lot of material up front, and it also doubles as my throttle return spring mount), so it would interfere with most of the dual snorkel type intakes.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 08:56 PM
  #410  
Handy Man's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
From: Houston
Default



Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-98db014c83636e4a3f4b856d5df4ba71.jpg  
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 09:49 PM
  #411  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

That Mach 1 probably has a Chevy engine ;-)

show us another pic of your engine bay, so we can look at what your working with.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 09:54 PM
  #412  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Probably going to be a while. Nose/fenders aren't on the car, but I'll see if I can dig up an old one.

Handy-man - don't tempt me. I've often thought of putting my drag motor and powerglide in this car. If only I thought the trans would survive the heat from a 2 minute blast...
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 11:19 PM
  #413  
Handy Man's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 20
From: Houston
Default

Haha! awesome!

Most of the fast SM hillclimb cars in the north east are essentially drag cars with wide front tires and better suspension
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 04:36 PM
  #414  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

I'm not sure I'm much different. Can't drive into turns worth a ****, but I can sure haul *** between them!
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 03:31 AM
  #415  
Vilko's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 111
Total Cats: 8
Default

I've noticed on a fair few race cars lately have the bottom corner of their front bar are "pushed in" then curve back out to line up with rest of the front bar at the very tip of the corner. Like this:
http://cdn.speedhunters.com/wp-conte..._sonoma-33.jpg
Is that to maximize top area of the splitter within regulations or is there more to it?
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 11:35 AM
  #416  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default CFD data

I've started getting back CFD data from the Catfish. We used the least aerodynamic setup as our baseline, and the open top car with a windscreen ended up having a coefficient of drag that you'd expect from a convertible.

edit--actually the number was about 0.05 to 0.15 better than other open top cars, but still...

The good news is that it creates downforce in stock trim.
Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-cp_side_creaform.jpg  

Last edited by cordycord; Sep 16, 2013 at 12:27 PM.
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 12:44 PM
  #417  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

Originally Posted by Vilko
I've noticed on a fair few race cars lately have the bottom corner of their front bar are "pushed in" then curve back out to line up with rest of the front bar at the very tip of the corner. Like this:
http://cdn.speedhunters.com/wp-conte..._sonoma-33.jpg
Is that to maximize top area of the splitter within regulations or is there more to it?
It's also to channel air around the bumper I quess


Originally Posted by cordycord
I've started getting back CFD data from the Catfish. We used the least aerodynamic setup as our baseline, and the open top car with a windscreen ended up having a coefficient of drag that you'd expect from a convertible.

edit--actually the number was about 0.05 to 0.15 better than other open top cars, but still...

The good news is that it creates downforce in stock trim.
Cordycord I love you body, how is the drag over the stock body.
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 01:38 PM
  #418  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by 1993ka24det

Cordycord I love you body, how is the drag over the stock body.
You realize how that sounds, right? Thanks, but I need to go on a diet...

The numbers we have on the Catfish are a little misleading, as they are using a windscreen that we haven't even mounted yet. Standard convertibles with open tops are 0.5 to 0.75 Cd (ugly), which is why Spec racers always race with a top. The windscreen used in the simulation is also a custom (made by computer) design. It's more square than the stock Miata, and more drag-inducing.

We've put the stock Miata screen on the car and it looks fantastic. In fact, we're able to rake the screen down to Lamborghini-style angles while still having good sight lines and the car looks even better. The rake would no doubt reduce our Cd, white removing the windscreen completely will cut a huge chunk of drag out and add downforce.
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 01:45 PM
  #419  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default Moby Dick

Speedhunters has a new story on Moby Dick:

911 TO THE EXTREME: THE 935/78 MOBY DICK - Speedhunters
Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-935-78_moby_dick-001.jpg  
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 01:59 PM
  #420  
1993ka24det's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 646
Total Cats: 62
From: The Race Track & St Pete FL
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
You realize how that sounds, right? Thanks, but I need to go on a diet...

The numbers we have on the Catfish are a little misleading, as they are using a windscreen that we haven't even mounted yet. Standard convertibles with open tops are 0.5 to 0.75 Cd (ugly), which is why Spec racers always race with a top. The windscreen used in the simulation is also a custom (made by computer) design. It's more square than the stock Miata, and more drag-inducing.

We've put the stock Miata screen on the car and it looks fantastic. In fact, we're able to rake the screen down to Lamborghini-style angles while still having good sight lines and the car looks even better. The rake would no doubt reduce our Cd, white removing the windscreen completely will cut a huge chunk of drag out and add downforce.
I know how that sounds, I thought it could be funny.

I have been thinking of buy the Exocet kit and designing some aero to help the air flow. Like these off of the Caparo T1

Attached Thumbnails Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-6978259346_b0a5da63f8_z_zps98e360b8.jpg   Aerodynamic Discussion Thread-article-0-11939e23000005dc-312_634x393_zps40fe93e1.jpg  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 PM.