Bellengineering - Miata Accessories Ordering and General Information Stephanie Turner 830-438-2890 ext. 103 stepht@bellengineering.net

Begi Intake Manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2008, 02:34 PM
  #81  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
You all need to get a flow bench
+fiddy

a shop vac and a homemade manometer would even be a start.
y8s is offline  
Old 10-31-2008, 03:41 PM
  #82  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
You all need to get a flow bench, put these manifolds on a head, and test. Just randomly building designs that Corky "thinks" are good without any empirical data is just ridiculous. It must be nice to have all that time to waste building parts.

Don't get me wrong, I love that you all are trying to get out a part that I know is needed greatly for our little cars in a performance application. However, building one off manifolds by hand without knowing anything about how they will perform is a huge waste of time. You need to take that young man that you have there, have him learn how to use solid works or any other nice CAD suite, and perform some computer flow analysis on your designs before you waste time fabricating manifolds.

Sure you might find a design that performs better than the stock manifold by randomly welding together parts. I don't think that will be very hard. The fact is that you will not know how much better it is, or if you could have made something even better than that for the same price.
+1. Yall's new mani might help flow overall, but I'd bet it could be improved and I doubt you'll get equal distribution without testing, changing, retesting, etc. But just like every other part on earth, it's built to improve something without measuring the problem parts performance or the new products performance. (think headers, manifolds, fuel rails, ignition systems, pistons, coatings, rods, valves, I could go on and on...)
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 10-31-2008, 06:55 PM
  #83  
Junior Member
 
fahrvergnugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Total Cats: 0
Default

Perhaps they are considering dynoing it once they have a few built prototypes?

What you suggest is valuable, but not near as valuable as a dyno sheet.
fahrvergnugen is offline  
Old 10-31-2008, 07:59 PM
  #84  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Default

Originally Posted by fahrvergnugen
Perhaps they are considering dynoing it once they have a few built prototypes?

What you suggest is valuable, but not near as valuable as a dyno sheet.
You're missing the point. That manifold might flow air really really well to 3 cylinders and cause an overall increase in HP on a dyno, but the resulting mismatch in flow causes AFR's to be off and can damage the engine. And of course is NOT ideal for HP. Point is unless it's flowbenched, you're just "guessing" to a point what's better. Granted they'll likely make something better than the stock part. But as neo pointed out, if you're gonna do something this big already, why not bite the bullet and flowbench your product to verify it's as good as can be.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 10-31-2008, 08:34 PM
  #85  
Junior Member
 
fahrvergnugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Total Cats: 0
Default

It's my fault for the confusion, I was responding to a previous posters' point on page 4, not any post on 5.


With that said, the point of even air flow between the cylinders is not lost on me, but I don't think it will be an issue. I understand that some would like some data, and that is cool. In fact, that is the only way you will know if you get an even flow between cylinders... However, on the point of it making more power, I don't think that will be an issue, how -much- power on the other hand...
fahrvergnugen is offline  
Old 10-31-2008, 10:06 PM
  #86  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

I just want my IM, screw you guys an your data.....

unless someone can teach me how to make FlowWorks work
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 09:42 AM
  #87  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I just want my IM, screw you guys an your data.....

unless someone can teach me how to make FlowWorks work
probably are online tutorials around. it's hard without the engineering background to get all the assumptions right though.

it'd be easier to just do a shop-vac + magnehelic flow test.
y8s is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:01 PM
  #88  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

ha, I had it working last night, but now FlowXpress keeps crashing when I try to use it. :(
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:07 PM
  #89  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

________
| SCOTT |
|_______|

This is Scott not thinking out of the box.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:26 PM
  #90  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

Doesn't scot have a magnehelic gauge? Or did you lend it to that guy with the hood?
cjernigan is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 01:12 PM
  #91  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
Doesn't scot have a magnehelic gauge? Or did you lend it to that guy with the hood?

i still have it. but you know what would be easier? bolt it up and enjoying.

in 4 minutes SolidWorks will be done copying onto my PC from my laptop. Now I can enjoy these 5 albums of 2 Live Crew I downloaded along with fooling around with this.
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 04:12 PM
  #92  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

A dyno is my favorite test method
kotomile is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 04:51 PM
  #93  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

You must like to waste all your time getting to that point though, and love possibly leaving a lot of power on the table.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 05:48 PM
  #94  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

I know what you're saying, NeoGen, and I agree. What you suggest is better R&D before any metal is bent, and what I was referring to was objective testing after the fact. I don't have much knowledge about this at all, but I would think that with Begi being such a relatively small operation, buying such software and putting it to good use would drive up the price substantially.
kotomile is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 07:15 PM
  #95  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Well, since they employ a person that is currently going to college they should have someone that is learning, or knows how to use the software. The fact is, the reason most or all places are going to CAD is because of the lower cost to a project. The fact that you can make, test, analyze an infinite number of design changes before ever even going to the material pile means that little to no time is wasted fabricating. Also you don't waste money in scraping bad designs.

So there is an upfront cost, but if you use it for everything from then on you save big.

I love that BEGI gives FM competition, but any business that wants to stay competitive in price and performance must invest in itself.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 02:28 PM
  #96  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

i think i set this up right...

basically .5 lb/sec of flow at 30psi. outlets at 14.7psi.

What it shows me is that a taper towards #4 would be ideal.

But this is much better than a flat wall. The air circles around the hemisphere...which in the least tapers the airflow down into #4 becuase it adds a high pressure system back there.

Attached Thumbnails Begi Intake Manifold-velocitycontour.jpg   Begi Intake Manifold-flowtrajectory.jpg  
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 03:16 PM
  #97  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

Pretty colors.
jayc72 is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 03:28 PM
  #98  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
johndoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,970
Total Cats: 1
Default

so it looks like the 4th runner is kind of starved compared to the others.
johndoe is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 04:54 PM
  #99  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

seems like a taper will really help, i threw this together in about 10 minutes.




i need to redo it the more a real scale plenum, then i compare the pressure drop and flow through each.
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 05:08 PM
  #100  
Junior Member
 
eunos1800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Athens
Posts: 197
Total Cats: 0
Default

What software is that please?
eunos1800 is offline  


Quick Reply: Begi Intake Manifold



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.