Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Never ending, Mostly winter, turbo NB project.

Old Dec 6, 2012 | 08:59 AM
  #21  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default


Just because "it will get the job done for xx" doesn't mean its ideal or good.

I typed up a giant post about why I think it would be stupid, but don't want to clutter this thread. Even found a flow chart for the pumps. If you're really interested, we can discuss.

We give noobs a hard time about half assing things. Here we have a guy that wants to do everything properly and you're telling him to half *** it.
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 10:23 AM
  #22  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

It's not half assed, it's just not a requirement that's all, did yo follow my link? Does that car look half assed to you?
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #23  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Not a requirement for who knows how much power/flow? Oh that's right "just crank it up dawg, when you start to run out of fuel and leaning out, then upgrade". I'm sorry, I'm not bashing either of you, and personally have done it myself for a short while (on my 1st turbo setup), but I just wouldn't recomend that.

Its kinda like we were all led to believe before that the 8-10psi fm voodoo kits are "ok" on stock fueling components til most started reporting major lean-ness and maxed out injectors even at 7psi
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #24  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I'm not gonna fight about this. OP can come to his own conclusions
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 10:35 AM
  #25  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,705
Total Cats: 904
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi

Just because "it will get the job done for xx" doesn't mean its ideal or good.

I typed up a giant post about why I think it would be stupid, but don't want to clutter this thread. Even found a flow chart for the pumps. If you're really interested, we can discuss.

We give noobs a hard time about half assing things. Here we have a guy that wants to do everything properly and you're telling him to half *** it.
Hmm, okay. I didn't mean to start a flame war or anything, I was just always under the impression that its not half-assing it on a stock fuel pump if your running stock pressures. When I went MS, I bought a NEW oem fuel pump at that time. It wouldn't have costed much more to go with a Walbro right away, but from the information I gathered at the time it wouldn't be needed for my purposes at all and it would be louder.

I'll take your word for it though, and start looking for a new pump for my 1.8 build. I want to make the car e85 capable anyways, and know I would most likely need more pump for that.
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #26  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

for e85 I would suggest looking at the dw lineup, which cost about the same and work silently
Just ordered a dw200 myself
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 11:06 AM
  #27  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

Stock pump if fine for a stock motor (for NA at least, not sure about you NB ****). Unless you need a new pump, then upgrade while you have it out and do the rest of the fueling system while you're at it. I made the mistake of doing piece by piece. OP mentions built motor, so use bigger pump!

OP, VooDoo box is scary stuff. There are reports of cars going really lean using stock fueling components.
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 11:52 AM
  #28  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Reading comprehension FTW!

Originally Posted by sr20det_28
Remember i'm with stock interns, have a GT2560, and don't plan on much more than 10-12PSI
OP, since you have a '99 with it's returnless fuel system, if you want to go bigger you will most likely have to run a return line.

But from my understanding you shouldn't need to do that until you go for some BORG WARNER S366 action.
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 03:37 PM
  #29  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

DW300, best pump ever made. especially considering that used fuel pumps have almost no resale value.
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 10:58 PM
  #30  
sr20det_28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Total Cats: 2
Default

Wow! now thats a debate!!!
Budget for a pump here is not really a issue, i just don't want to go too overkill.
i did mention a built motor, but not now, because THAT is a budget issue haha!

i'm changing the pump and regulator anyway, i had a few report of pressure lost last summer, plus, the pump have 10XXXX miles on it, i'm there, why not put up a few bucks more for a good, high flowing, reliable pump!

The labor here is also not an issue, i have all winter + lift and all equipment i need!

So i'm kind of into the 255HP, it's not too expensive, so we got that one on the list! Now, knowing that i'm changing the regulator, could the extra labor of making a return line w/ Adj. regulator would be worth it? If so, what would be the best way to do it?

Yes i know, i'm asking alot of question, but my tuning experience is a bit low!
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 11:00 PM
  #31  
sr20det_28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by viperormiata
OP, VooDoo box is scary stuff. There are reports of cars going really lean using stock fueling components.
It's unstable, i had the first voodoo return to FM because it leak about 10Hg of vaccum -_-

I'm curious of seeing those report tho! if you have quick links i would love too read that!
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 11:01 PM
  #32  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

if you're going for big power, might as well convert to return style. otherwise the 255hp will easily get you to 300-400
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 11:07 PM
  #33  
czubaka's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 501
Total Cats: 105
From: Sacile, Italy
Default

Using a bigger pump on the NB (DW300, WB 255, etc), does it require a different FPR? Or will the stock one suffice? Also, any issues with running the bigger pump on the stock ecu (for when I go to OBDII compliant mode)?

Sorry for the OT, just got excited about the fuel pump discussion.

Very nice build!
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 12:41 AM
  #34  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

Originally Posted by sr20det_28
I'm planning maxing the GT25 in a few years(built engine), so maybe the best would be to go for the 255, for the price difference...
Originally Posted by thenuge26
Reading comprehension FTW!


OP, you're on the right track. If you know you're gooing above 250whp and building the motor, then yes, it won't hurt at all to start getting your supporting mods done now.
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 10:01 PM
  #35  
sr20det_28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Total Cats: 2
Default

After holidays i should get parts coming in, i got a to do list going up!


Excuse my poor writting here!
Attached Thumbnails Never ending, Mostly winter, turbo NB project.-59325_10152322155440046_2146973167_n.jpg  
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 07:29 PM
  #36  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by czubaka
Using a bigger pump on the NB (DW300, WB 255, etc), does it require a different FPR? Or will the stock one suffice? Also, any issues with running the bigger pump on the stock ecu (for when I go to OBDII compliant mode)?

Sorry for the OT, just got excited about the fuel pump discussion.

Very nice build!
I run
- stock 91 FPR
- stock 91 fuel lines
- stock 91 fuel filter
- stock 99 fuel rail
- stock fuel filter
- Deatschwerks DW300 fuel pump kit
- Injector Dynamics 1000cc
- Gates Barricade 225psi fuel hose (Part #H344A/H344A/H349A/H354A at NAPA)

Basically everything stock except pump, fuel injectors and some good fuel hose.
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 07:43 PM
  #37  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

I seem to remember where someone tested a factory NB pump and it had trouble keeping the pressure up @ 7k running N/A with stock injectors.

Fuel Pump - Miata Turbo FAQ

Vlad is right, the $80 wally pump is a no brainier. The 190HP should be fine, and IIRC the amprage draw isn't that much of a hit compared to stock.
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 09:31 PM
  #38  
sr20det_28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Total Cats: 2
Default

Will the amp difference of the 255HP cause trouble?
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 10:37 PM
  #39  
czubaka's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 501
Total Cats: 105
From: Sacile, Italy
Default

Leonid, thanks for the info! Are you running a return-less system with that 99 fuel rail?

Joel, treadstone has a fuel pump wiring kit for $30 that I may try to avoid any power issues.

People just don't realize that some good hose can change the world...

Last edited by czubaka; Dec 11, 2012 at 10:38 PM. Reason: Obligatory hose comment...
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 02:39 PM
  #40  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

I'm about 98% sure Leonid is running a return on his system.

I've actually got a complete fuel line from a friends NB that will end up in my car, once I figure out how to plumb it in. The NB returnless system is a disaster with the regulator in the tank and no vacuum reference.

Vlad: How did you run your fuel systems in your previous NBs?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 PM.