Notices
Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 10:25 AM
  #641  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

bias doesn't matter if caters to your opinion, only when there is a dissent.
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 01:24 PM
  #642  
gearhead_318's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
From: SoCal
Default

It seems like the only major news outlet that gives Paul a fair amount of coverage isn't a news outlet at all, its the Daily Show.
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 02:07 PM
  #643  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
It seems like the only major news outlet that gives Paul a fair amount of coverage isn't a news outlet at all, its the Daily Show.
Thank you for differentiating "the daily show" from "news outlet", I will sleep better tonight.
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 03:22 PM
  #644  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
It seems like the only major news outlet that gives Paul a fair amount of coverage isn't a news outlet at all, its the Daily Show.
Sadly, the daily show is about as informative as the rest of the news outlets - which should illustrate how bad news outlets have gotten.
Old Dec 19, 2011 | 12:38 AM
  #645  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default

A government that is big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything away from you – including your Internet freedom.

That’s the thought that keeps running through my head as I contemplate the full-scale panic going on right now about SOPA, the “Stop Internet Piracy Act”.

It’s a bad bill, all right. It’s a terrible bill – awful from start to finish, idiotic to the core, corruptly pandering to a powerful special-interest group at the cost of everyone else’s liberty.

But I can’t help noticing that a lot of the righteous panic about it is being ginned up by people who were cheerfully on board for the last seventeen or so government power grabs – cap and trade, campaign finance “reform”, the incandescent lightbulb ban, Obamacare, you name it – and I have to wonder…

Don’t these people ever learn? Anything? Do they even listen to themselves?

It’s bizarre and entertaining to hear people who yesterday were all about allegedly benign and intelligent government interventions suddenly discovering that in practice, what they get is stupid and vicious legislation that has been captured by a venal and evil interest group.

Yeah, no ****? How…how do they avoid noticing that in reality it’s like this all the time?

The depressing part is how safe a bet it is that they’ll go back to being oblivious the moment their direct interests aren’t threatened. They’ll cheer for the next tax hike, the next round of environmental feel-goodism, the next political “fix” for the next transient market failure – and never notice that by doing so they’re creating the political conditions in which malignant growths like SOPAs inevitably flourish.

So here’s a clue: the only way to keep your freedom – on the Internet or anywhere else – is to defend everyone else’s freedom as well, by keeping your government tiny and starved and rigidly constrained in what it can do. Otherwise, the future you’re begging for is SOPAs without end.
Source: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=4009

Interesting read.



And worth a watch.

Last edited by blaen99; Dec 19, 2011 at 03:38 AM.
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 12:36 PM
  #646  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Attachment 186295

Last edited by Braineack; Oct 8, 2019 at 09:48 AM.
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 03:04 PM
  #647  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Old Dec 21, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #648  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Poor Ronny.


I call him Ronny btw.
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 04:12 PM
  #649  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

I was wondering if that was supposed to be "anyone other than Newt or Mitt" or if that was actually supposed to be Ron Paul.
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 04:13 PM
  #650  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default

20+20+19 = 59%.

Or they are missing about 41% of the vote - I don't think that is "anyone other than Newt or Mitt". Unless over 40% of the people they polled chose "None of the above".

...Okay, I could believe that.
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 04:13 PM
  #651  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
I was wondering if that was supposed to be "anyone other than Newt or Mitt" or if that was actually supposed to be Ron Paul.
My guess is probably that they intended "Anyone Else" and not "Someone Else", but it's still funny.
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 04:20 PM
  #652  
blaen99's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
From: Seattle, WA
Default The Ultimate Troll

On another note, other than the Media screwing Ron Paul...

http://www.wtkr.com/news/wtkr-uss-oa...,5635457.story

Oh no they di'nt.
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 08:20 PM
  #653  
jared8783's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by fooger03
Thank you for differentiating "the daily show" from "news outlet", I will sleep better tonight.


on a really off note
i was surfin the interwebz the other day
and just tell me what looks odd on this page
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 09:22 PM
  #654  
jared8783's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default



Old Dec 22, 2011 | 08:05 PM
  #655  
jared8783's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default

who remembers this?
when the citizens trying to protect their person and homes had their guns confiscated by the US govt during katrina

Old Dec 26, 2011 | 04:37 PM
  #656  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by blaen99
Sadly, the daily show is about as informative as the rest of the news outlets - which should illustrate how bad news outlets have gotten.
Quoted for truth.

At least they are willing to lampoon everyones hypocrisy as it presents easy targets.
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 09:43 PM
  #657  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by jared8783
who remembers this?
when the citizens trying to protect their person and homes had their guns confiscated by the US govt during katrina

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4
That is tough to watch.

We are only one perceived or contrived national emergency away from having that happen anywhere or everywhere. Anyone who doesn't believe it is no student of history. It happened here already and can again. Some people just need to touch the stove themselves before they figure out it is hot.

I worry about the forced removal of my rights in the hurricane state I live in, too. Nobody ever wants to think about the police going door to door doing "welfare checks" after a storm and pulling people out of their homes and leaving their property wide open for the thugs and looters. I know good smart cops but most of them I know couldn't hold a decent job doing anything more than working for UPS. They will do whatever the **** somebody in charge tells them to do regardless of its legality or constitutionality. They are afraid not to.
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 10:48 PM
  #658  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by jared8783
who remembers this?
when the citizens trying to protect their person and homes had their guns confiscated by the US govt during katrina
Wow that is total BS.

Old Dec 26, 2011 | 10:57 PM
  #659  
Enginerd's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,451
Total Cats: 77
Default

Yup. As Ron Paul puts it, the government's job is NOT to protect people from themselves. If they want to stay home before, during or after a disaster, the gov. should pat them on the back and say, "Good Luck," not, "Pack your **** before I pummel your face and steal your only form of personal protection."
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 11:45 PM
  #660  
gearhead_318's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
From: SoCal
Default

Just for the sake of argument, it is very expensive to rescue people when they get trapped by flood waters or whatever so how do we weigh that vs peoples desire to protect their property, something I completely understand, respect and agree with?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.