The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,143
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Rational...8103382&sr=8-1
How many pages is it and are they mostly pictures?
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
The cover blurb, which makes reference to "calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics," seems to imply that a majority of people ("our") believe that voters are fundamentally rational and predisposed to making informed decisions.
I don't assume this, nor can I think of many people who do, with those few being themselves especially shining examples of irrationality.
I'm curious as to how many people here genuinely believe that a significant percentage of voters (not just in America, but in any nation which holds elections and / or referendums) are to a significant extent well-informed about the candidates and policies for which they are voting, and make rational decisions about same.
Last edited by Joe Perez; Nov 2, 2016 at 01:36 PM.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,143
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Serious question:
The cover blurb, which makes reference to "calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics," seems to imply that a majority of people ("our") believe that voters are fundamental rational and predisposed to making informed decisions.
I don't assume this, nor can I think of many people who do, with those few being themselves especially shining examples of irrationality.
I'm curious as to how many people here genuinely believe that a significant percentage of voters (not just in America, but in any nation which holds elections and / or referendums) are to a significant extent well-informed about the candidates and policies for which they are voting, and make rational decisions about same.
The cover blurb, which makes reference to "calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics," seems to imply that a majority of people ("our") believe that voters are fundamental rational and predisposed to making informed decisions.
I don't assume this, nor can I think of many people who do, with those few being themselves especially shining examples of irrationality.
I'm curious as to how many people here genuinely believe that a significant percentage of voters (not just in America, but in any nation which holds elections and / or referendums) are to a significant extent well-informed about the candidates and policies for which they are voting, and make rational decisions about same.
Once you're in government, you're entrenched. Rich PAC's nd name recognition allow you to stay elected pretty much as long as you want, as long as you don't do anything truly stupid. Change prevents what we see now--political inbreeding.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Democrats on Blacks voting Repulican:

Thomas Sowell

One of the most pervasive political visions of our time is the vision of liberals as compassionate and conservatives as less caring.
yours tried sending me to walmart
https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Rational-Voter-Democracies-Policies/dp/0691138737/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1478103382&sr=8-1
How many pages is it and are they mostly pictures?
https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Rational-Voter-Democracies-Policies/dp/0691138737/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1478103382&sr=8-1
How many pages is it and are they mostly pictures?
No clue on pages, but not a ton of pictures. I also sent Nolan a very angry message asking why it is going to walmart and not amazon. He is going get get it sorted out.
Serious question:
The cover blurb, which makes reference to "calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics," seems to imply that a majority of people ("our") believe that voters are fundamental rational and predisposed to making informed decisions.
I don't assume this, nor can I think of many people who do, with those few being themselves especially shining examples of irrationality.
I'm curious as to how many people here genuinely believe that a significant percentage of voters (not just in America, but in any nation which holds elections and / or referendums) are to a significant extent well-informed about the candidates and policies for which they are voting, and make rational decisions about same.
The cover blurb, which makes reference to "calling into question our most basic assumptions about American politics," seems to imply that a majority of people ("our") believe that voters are fundamental rational and predisposed to making informed decisions.
I don't assume this, nor can I think of many people who do, with those few being themselves especially shining examples of irrationality.
I'm curious as to how many people here genuinely believe that a significant percentage of voters (not just in America, but in any nation which holds elections and / or referendums) are to a significant extent well-informed about the candidates and policies for which they are voting, and make rational decisions about same.
Bryan goes into how most people don't actually make what would be considered "rational" choices, nor are they actually informed when they vote. The book is overall a good primer into Public Choice Theory.
That's because the public is unegaged and uniformed. Or else they would pay attention to the corruption and vote them out.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
My point being: "I'm going to vote for Candidate X because they said [nice / mean] things about [group of people], and I agree with them!" despite the fact that Candidate X has a proven track record of [fraud / embezzlement / pork-barrel spending / destabilizing foreign relations / comitting capital crimes].
Or, more specifically here in Chicago, "I'm going to vote in favor of the Safe Roads Constitutional Amendment because the ad on TV said it'll prevent those fat cats in Springfield from pocketing my road tax revenue," when it fact it does precisely the opposite- officially enshrining the notion that vehicle and gasoline taxes can (and will) be diverted to funding administrative salaries, building more speed cameras, and propping up the airport authority.
I don't trust voters to see beyond the shiny surface of a campaign ad, and I'm (peripherally) in the business of making sure that they don't.
And for the latest twist in this bizarro election cycle...
Teen Girl Who Got Sexts From Anthony Weiner Writes Open Letter To FBI Director Comey -
Teen Girl Who Got Sexts From Anthony Weiner Writes Open Letter To FBI Director Comey
The 15-year-old girl who received sexual text messages from Anthony Weiner is furious with FBI Director James Comey for thrusting her into the middle of a political firestorm.
And I've not done any background checking on this yet and the original article date is 10/30/16 so not sure what's "updated";
Breaking/Exclusive: Comey Lied: FBI ?Synced? Weiner Laptop Under Misused Terror Warrant ? Updated | Veterans Today
Breaking/Exclusive: Comey Lied: FBI “Synced” Weiner Laptop Under Misused Terror Warrant – Updated
In a surprise announcement, the Department of Justice just admitted that there was no legal authorization in place to access email accounts of Hillary Clinton aide, Huma Abedin, estranged wife of accused sex offender former Congressman Anthony Weiner. Additionally, it has now been learned that the FBI had accessed Huma Abedin’s cloud based email account as early as September 22 and certainly by the beginning of October, according to CNN.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
And I've not done any background checking on this yet and the original article date is 10/30/16 so not sure what's "updated";
Breaking/Exclusive: Comey Lied: FBI ?Synced? Weiner Laptop Under Misused Terror Warrant ? Updated Veterans Today
Breaking/Exclusive: Comey Lied: FBI ?Synced? Weiner Laptop Under Misused Terror Warrant ? Updated Veterans Today
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...bb4_story.html
the FBI had been pursuing both investigations for a while, but the Clinton Foundation paid off the DOJ, who in turn tried to **** all over the investigation.
https://www.facebook.com/TheAmericanDogParty/videos/365828643764432/
Last edited by Braineack; Nov 3, 2016 at 07:55 AM.







