The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
#8744
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,029
Total Cats: 6,594
It's possible this may help to loosen the blockage:
Rachel Dolezal says she is more stigmatized than transgender people
By Avi Selk April 3 at 12:15 PM
Rachel Dolezal says she’s transracial — and thus faces more stigma than transgender people.
When an NAACP leader named Rachel Dolezal was accused in 2015 of being a white woman who had lied about her race, she was widely condemned within the black community she called home.
Dolezal had hijacked a racial identity, some said. “I see blackface,” a law professor wrote [url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/06/12/what-rachel-dolezal-doesnt-understand-being-black-is-about-more-than-just-how-you-look/in The Washington Post[/url] — rejecting Dolezal’s insistence that she was in fact “transracial.”
Now Dolezal is giving interviews to promote her new book, insisting she is a transracial woman in a white body, and stirring new kinds of outrage in the transgender community.
In an interview with Salon last week, Dolezal compared herself to Caitlyn Jenner — an Olympic athlete turned transgender icon.
“There was a time when we did call transgender, or even gay and bisexual, people crazy,” she said.
“That still perpetuates, to a degree, but there’s more acceptance for gender fluidity than there is race fluidity right now.”
Everyone would agree with this statement, Dolezal said. Everyone did not.
.
“To a degree?” transgender writer Gabrielle M.W. Bychowski said.
.
“Yes, to a degree that it enrages me that you attempt to minimize the currently very active violence against the trans community as a way to elevate yourself.”
“Never mind the fact that gay conversion therapy camps still exist and transgender people are abused and murdered for existing,” the Daily Dot observed. “According to Dolezal, that ship in history has sailed.”
And her comparison sailed across the Internet.
Last month, several members of Congress called for a federal hate crime investigation of a string of transgender killings. Advocates have long complained of routine violence and bigotry against the community.
While anger among black people dominated early coverage of Dolezal’s scandal in 2015, some were disturbed even then by her idea of racial fluidity.
‘Most people who are transgender, as early as 4 or 5, believe already that at some level that they are a child born with the wrong anatomy,’” psychologist Derald Wing Sue told People in 2015, in the wake of the scandal.
In a BBC Newsnight interview last week, Dolezal acknowledged she was raised as a white girl by white parents. But she echoed a theme in the childhoods of many transgender people:
“I had to constantly mask and subordinate and repress part of myself to kind of, survive, socially,” she said. “If somebody saw me as black or mixed or light skinned, it was more comfortable because it was a box I could be put in.”
It wasn’t clear in the interview if Dolezal still called herself black, exactly.
“The idea of race is a lie,” she said at one point. She called it a “social construction in America” elsewhere.
“I stand on the black side” of that social construct, she said.
But later: “We don’t have a choice in how we are born and who we are … and this is truly who I am.”
Whoever she is, Dolezal told the BBC she is “extremely stigmatized and ostracized.”
Even more than transgender people, she said in the subsequent Salon interview, in which she also acknowledged that her ideas are not widely accepted.
“Maybe we will evolve and grow and racial fluidity will become a thing in 20 years?” she said. “I don’t know.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...gender-people/
By Avi Selk April 3 at 12:15 PM
Rachel Dolezal says she’s transracial — and thus faces more stigma than transgender people.
When an NAACP leader named Rachel Dolezal was accused in 2015 of being a white woman who had lied about her race, she was widely condemned within the black community she called home.
Dolezal had hijacked a racial identity, some said. “I see blackface,” a law professor wrote [url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/06/12/what-rachel-dolezal-doesnt-understand-being-black-is-about-more-than-just-how-you-look/in The Washington Post[/url] — rejecting Dolezal’s insistence that she was in fact “transracial.”
Now Dolezal is giving interviews to promote her new book, insisting she is a transracial woman in a white body, and stirring new kinds of outrage in the transgender community.
In an interview with Salon last week, Dolezal compared herself to Caitlyn Jenner — an Olympic athlete turned transgender icon.
“There was a time when we did call transgender, or even gay and bisexual, people crazy,” she said.
“That still perpetuates, to a degree, but there’s more acceptance for gender fluidity than there is race fluidity right now.”
Everyone would agree with this statement, Dolezal said. Everyone did not.
.
“To a degree?” transgender writer Gabrielle M.W. Bychowski said.
Facebook Post
“Yes, to a degree that it enrages me that you attempt to minimize the currently very active violence against the trans community as a way to elevate yourself.”
“Never mind the fact that gay conversion therapy camps still exist and transgender people are abused and murdered for existing,” the Daily Dot observed. “According to Dolezal, that ship in history has sailed.”
And her comparison sailed across the Internet.
Last month, several members of Congress called for a federal hate crime investigation of a string of transgender killings. Advocates have long complained of routine violence and bigotry against the community.
While anger among black people dominated early coverage of Dolezal’s scandal in 2015, some were disturbed even then by her idea of racial fluidity.
‘Most people who are transgender, as early as 4 or 5, believe already that at some level that they are a child born with the wrong anatomy,’” psychologist Derald Wing Sue told People in 2015, in the wake of the scandal.
In a BBC Newsnight interview last week, Dolezal acknowledged she was raised as a white girl by white parents. But she echoed a theme in the childhoods of many transgender people:
“I had to constantly mask and subordinate and repress part of myself to kind of, survive, socially,” she said. “If somebody saw me as black or mixed or light skinned, it was more comfortable because it was a box I could be put in.”
It wasn’t clear in the interview if Dolezal still called herself black, exactly.
“The idea of race is a lie,” she said at one point. She called it a “social construction in America” elsewhere.
“I stand on the black side” of that social construct, she said.
But later: “We don’t have a choice in how we are born and who we are … and this is truly who I am.”
Whoever she is, Dolezal told the BBC she is “extremely stigmatized and ostracized.”
Even more than transgender people, she said in the subsequent Salon interview, in which she also acknowledged that her ideas are not widely accepted.
“Maybe we will evolve and grow and racial fluidity will become a thing in 20 years?” she said. “I don’t know.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...gender-people/
#8745
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
******* idiot.
You know you dun fucked up when even the SJW's are calling you insensitive. She dun broke the stupid barrier and came out the other side...
If anyone wants evidence of someone having a persecution complex, it's her. Her entire identity centers around her being persecuted...
You know you dun fucked up when even the SJW's are calling you insensitive. She dun broke the stupid barrier and came out the other side...
If anyone wants evidence of someone having a persecution complex, it's her. Her entire identity centers around her being persecuted...
#8748
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
She opened up the flood gates to millions of people who have no intention of following laws, assimilating into the culture, and/or not raping/marrying young children so now she has to make a statement like that to (deaf ears) the scum now living in her country.
#8749
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Oh hey look at Susan Rice still lying to Fake News! She's so useful.
"I know nothing about this"
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...urces-say.html
hmmm...
The video! THE VIDEO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111111 1111111one
"I know nothing about this"
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...urces-say.html
Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caughtup in surveillance.
The video! THE VIDEO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111111 1111111one
#8750
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
lol, maybe she's actually the one who created the video in the first place...
DiGenova: Rice Ordered 'Spreadsheets' on Calls Involving Trump, Aides | The Daily Caller
DiGenova: Rice Ordered 'Spreadsheets' on Calls Involving Trump, Aides | The Daily Caller
Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.
“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.
“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”
Other official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election.
“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.
“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”
Other official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election.
#8751
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
clearly creal news:
https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-g...instructs-view
best just to ignore news you dont like.
I like how he can claim that the Rice story is "demonstrably untrue" without any evidence, yet Trump and Russia is still a thing...
https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-g...instructs-view
CNN Tonight's Don Lemon went so far as to announce he would ignore the news at all costs.
While interviewing a Democratic congressman, CNN's Chris Cuomo claimed it was "demonstrably untrue" Rice sought surveillance of the Trump team, even as that's exactly what yesterday's reports prove.
Over the last 24 hours, the network has also repeatedly called on its chief national security correspondent, Jim Sciutto, to dismiss the reports as a non-story; Sciutto has even excused Rice claiming ignorance of the unmasking scandal two weeks ago, arguing Rice "wasn't aware" what unmasking Rep. Devin Nunes (D-Calif.) was referring to.
And on Tuesday's "New Day," anchor Alisyn Camerota openly pleaded with Sen. John McCain to write-off the news as unimportant.
At the top of Lemon's show Monday night, the "CNN Tonight" anchor called the Rice report a "fake scandal ginned up by right-wing media and Trump" that he would not be baited into justifying with coverage.
"On this program tonight, we will not insult your intelligence by pretending," it's legitimate, he said. "Nor will we aid and abet the people trying to misinform you, the American people, by creating a diversion. Not going to do it."
...
While interviewing a Democratic congressman, CNN's Chris Cuomo claimed it was "demonstrably untrue" Rice sought surveillance of the Trump team, even as that's exactly what yesterday's reports prove.
Over the last 24 hours, the network has also repeatedly called on its chief national security correspondent, Jim Sciutto, to dismiss the reports as a non-story; Sciutto has even excused Rice claiming ignorance of the unmasking scandal two weeks ago, arguing Rice "wasn't aware" what unmasking Rep. Devin Nunes (D-Calif.) was referring to.
And on Tuesday's "New Day," anchor Alisyn Camerota openly pleaded with Sen. John McCain to write-off the news as unimportant.
At the top of Lemon's show Monday night, the "CNN Tonight" anchor called the Rice report a "fake scandal ginned up by right-wing media and Trump" that he would not be baited into justifying with coverage.
"On this program tonight, we will not insult your intelligence by pretending," it's legitimate, he said. "Nor will we aid and abet the people trying to misinform you, the American people, by creating a diversion. Not going to do it."
...
best just to ignore news you dont like.
I like how he can claim that the Rice story is "demonstrably untrue" without any evidence, yet Trump and Russia is still a thing...
#8752
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
She did; hence the current state of Germany--respect goes both way.
She opened up the flood gates to millions of people who have no intention of following laws, assimilating into the culture, and/or not raping/marrying young children so now she has to make a statement like that to (deaf ears) the scum now living in her country.
She opened up the flood gates to millions of people who have no intention of following laws, assimilating into the culture, and/or not raping/marrying young children so now she has to make a statement like that to (deaf ears) the scum now living in her country.
#8753
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
1. I don't need to provide evidence.
2. You sound like CNN and their reactions to Trump's statements -- which turn out to be correct.
3. Her statement directed to the lawbreaking immigrants that are ruining her country is enough. Although you could google and learn about how shitty germany is now due to the influx of shitty people into it.
4. correct, but its just another part of the problem with allowing horrible people into your country. diversity is not a virtue -- especially when those people are a plague.
2. You sound like CNN and their reactions to Trump's statements -- which turn out to be correct.
3. Her statement directed to the lawbreaking immigrants that are ruining her country is enough. Although you could google and learn about how shitty germany is now due to the influx of shitty people into it.
4. correct, but its just another part of the problem with allowing horrible people into your country. diversity is not a virtue -- especially when those people are a plague.
#8754
OMSBOA (Oh my supreme being or atheist) on the Crowder vid. Dont want to use OMG anymore so as not to offend any non christians or non believers.
#8755
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: New Fucking Jersey
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 143
1. I don't need to provide evidence.
2. You sound like CNN and their reactions to Trump's statements -- which turn out to be correct.
3. Her statement directed to the lawbreaking immigrants that are ruining her country is enough. Although you could google and learn about how shitty germany is now due to the influx of shitty people into it.
4. correct, but its just another part of the problem with allowing horrible people into your country. diversity is not a virtue -- especially when those people are a plague.
2. You sound like CNN and their reactions to Trump's statements -- which turn out to be correct.
3. Her statement directed to the lawbreaking immigrants that are ruining her country is enough. Although you could google and learn about how shitty germany is now due to the influx of shitty people into it.
4. correct, but its just another part of the problem with allowing horrible people into your country. diversity is not a virtue -- especially when those people are a plague.
2. A broken clock is right twice a day.
3. I'm sure one will find ample 'evidence' to support whatever point of view they have. That's how the internet works.
4. Why do you hate america?
#8760
So is the SecState in agreement with POTUS Vis-à-vis Syria? Seems like only yesterday he said Assad 'good to stay'. That must've been before the latest gassing of civilians and the "crossing of many lines" for POTUS. I mean MANY lines must mean more than a RED line??
And before the inevitable post with a quote from his predecessor pops up, don't bother. Same old ****, different year.
And before the inevitable post with a quote from his predecessor pops up, don't bother. Same old ****, different year.