Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2018, 09:44 PM
  #10741  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
samnavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VaBch, VA
Posts: 6,451
Total Cats: 322
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
To my eye, that woman crossing the road did not dart out nor did she come out of nowhere. She was just strolling across at a gradual, yet constant pace in a wide section of the road that was far enough away from any tight or blind turns. The way I learned to drive, it's the DRIVER of a car who is responsible (at all times) for operating the vehicle within their ability to stop for such an unexpected encounter.

The excuse of not being able to see her is similarly bunk; if you are truly in control, you certainly don't out-drive your headlights (i.e. what you can clearly see). Anyone old enough to have driven before the days of even halogen bulbs (let alone modern HID/ LED types), can likely recall how easy to was to outrun (even your high) incandescent beams without much trouble.

As such, I think a human driver, of prudent practices, could well have avoided that accident. That being said, I still think the woman was a complete idiot. Anyone foolish enough to trust their life to the (un)likely adherence of a driver to basic safety practices is essentially playing Russian roulette. At least the gene pool is stronger by one now.
I disagree with your first part. I think it's unreasonable to place such an overarching burden upon a driver. Once a vehicle reaches a certain speed relative to the speed at which an object appears in the drivers vision that is CBDR, there comes a point where a collission is unavoidable due to human reaction time. This assumes the driver is operating the vehicle safely and is within the speed limit. Everybody basically needs to be where they're designed (and expected) to be. When they're not, trying to place blame is really besides the point that a pedestrian is dead because they weren't where they were supposed to be AND they weren't paying attention. Kids get killed all the time in 25mph zones because they "dart out from behind parked cars"... and nobody really blames the driver... nobody really blames the kid either... nobody really blames the parent... just a "terrible tragedy". This event was an adult who wasn't where they were supposed to be and wasn't paying attention, and doing something that one could reasonably expect to result in death if they screw it up. It's kinda pointless to blame the driver regardless of the self-driving aspect or the texting aspect.

However, I'd love to see the statistics on people killed in crosswalks vs. people not in crosswalks. The pure numbers are probably much higher in crosswalks because that's where people tend to actually cross the road... BUT, I'd put money down on a huge factor in that being that people in crosswalks DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO TRAFFIC... while people crossing in other areas pay real close attention. That was clearly not the case here, but I don't think it's unreasonable to say that this specific type of traffic fatality is the exception rather than the rule.

And now for the spin... In this case, we've been shown an extremely low-resolution video provided to the press by Uber that does it's best job to make it look like she "came out of the shadows" and that opens the door to siding with the driver who "wouldn't have seen her anyways." Shortly, we'll have people driving down that same road taking video with their iphones and posting it that show how much better lit to the human eye it really is. I wouldn't be surprised if this original video was doctored in some way too. Uber is fucked, and the media is gonna help... remember all the bullshit Toyota went through with it's "unintended acceleration" that was a total fabrication by "victims" in conjunction with an army of lawyers and the direct support of the mass-media. Uber now has to play that game... it starts with releasing a bullshit doctored video.
samnavy is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 12:14 AM
  #10742  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
good2go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,703
Total Cats: 1,143
Default

^^ Well, here you go Sam:


good2go is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 02:11 AM
  #10743  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
samnavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VaBch, VA
Posts: 6,451
Total Cats: 322
Default

We have a term in Naval Aviation where somebody calls it like I called it... we say "No ******* ****!" I'm looking forward to the upper and middle-management cleansing about to take place in that company. This is shaping up to be a real story. The leadership at Lyft is probably ***** deep in a hooker-and-blow filled weekend of celebration.
samnavy is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 08:45 AM
  #10744  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
(The Zapruder film)
I'm honestly a tad surprised at how quickly the armchair analysts have sprung to life here in creating the conspiracy theories.

"If you look at this frame, and if you look at this frame... I don't know what to make of it, I'm just telling you what it is."





Also, speaking from the point of view of a frequent user of Uber, I find their service to be exemplary. I have used it many, many times in big cities like Chicago and NYC, and in "barely on the map" cities like Asheville, NC. The service has always been exemplary, with vehicles (and drivers) which are much cleaner and more pleasant to be in (and around) than medallion cabs.

Last edited by Joe Perez; 03-23-2018 at 09:20 AM. Reason: Schpelling
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:02 AM
  #10745  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

and people wonder how Trump got elected...

Congress Gives Itself a Bonus in Omnibus
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:08 AM
  #10746  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
not shocked. when I saw it, and my comment alludes to it with my "A human eye MAY have picked up on the biker outside those street lamps" comment that the dark areas in that video were deceptively dark and only represented the lack of dynamic range of the camera itself. I also kinda thought the video looked like the bike walker just appeared out of the blue.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:16 AM
  #10747  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
and people wonder how Trump got elected...

Congress Gives Itself a Bonus in Omnibus
Thank God they're going to finally improve wine label accuracy....

Well actually, they're mandating someone else do it so somebody must've gotten a shitty bottle at the last taxpayer funded dinner.
bahurd is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:20 AM
  #10748  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

It's obviously a conspiracy by X to prevent sovereign citizens having their privilege to drive cars taken away. Because the highly integrated and registered network for autonomous transportation to work will mean the gov't will know every single person is at every single point of the day.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:41 AM
  #10749  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
It's obviously a conspiracy by X to prevent sovereign citizens having their privilege to drive cars taken away. Because the highly integrated and registered network for autonomous transportation to work will mean the gov't will know every single person is at every single point of the day.
They pretty much do/can already. Use a cell phone?
bahurd is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:49 AM
  #10750  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
They pretty much do/can already. Use a cell phone?
Yes, I know. It was sarcasm. I was agreeing with Joe that basically anytime anything happens it's because of the NWO/Gov't/Lizard people alliance meant to enslave all of humanity.

There was a story recently that your phone in "Airplane Mode" doesn't really turn off the radios and still tracks everywhere you are.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 12:45 PM
  #10751  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
good2go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,703
Total Cats: 1,143
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez

...

Having watched the video many times, I'm quite certain that she'd be just as dead if a human had been driving a normal car under those circumstances. ...
So let me ask you, having seen another driver's video of the actual lighting which exists on that road, do you still believe a human would not have done better in this instance?
good2go is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 12:52 PM
  #10752  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
Thank God they're going to finally improve wine label accuracy....

Well actually, they're mandating someone else do it so somebody must've gotten a shitty bottle at the last taxpayer funded dinner.
they lined ~18 candidates up on stage, and it was clear what the voter based wanted. a tall wall, a stronger economy and less govt. so what do the rhinos give them? no wall, and more spending.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 01:43 PM
  #10753  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
they lined ~18 candidates up on stage, and it was clear what the voter based wanted. a tall wall, a stronger economy and less govt. so what do the rhinos give them? no wall, and more spending.
+ more debt so I guess they match the average American in that regard. Spend it like you got it folks!
bahurd is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 01:56 PM
  #10754  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
So let me ask you, having seen another driver's video of the actual lighting which exists on that road, do you still believe a human would not have done better in this instance?
How is a different camera at a different angle with who knows what aperture setting, etc, how is that any kind of valid comparison?
z31maniac is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 02:01 PM
  #10755  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
How is a different camera at a different angle with who knows what aperture setting, etc, how is that any kind of valid comparison?
but that camera isn't what the car is using to detect things anyway -- so that video does nothing more than show what happened. Also, the driver actually said I have no issues seeing people on the side of the road even in the darker areas.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 02:15 PM
  #10756  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
but that camera isn't what the car is using to detect things anyway -- so that video does nothing more than show what happened. Also, the driver actually said I have no issues seeing people on the side of the road even in the darker areas.
It does seem like a pretty big screw up on the part of RADAR/LIDAR. But also having been involved in software development and testing in MUCH less complex systems, it doesn't always perform the same in the real world.

I'm not sure why people think software in infallible.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 02:28 PM
  #10757  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,660
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Maybe the car wasn't paying attention.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 02:30 PM
  #10758  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
samnavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: VaBch, VA
Posts: 6,451
Total Cats: 322
Default

This is all about the SPIN. Totally obvious that Uber is playing games when some random bro with a cel-phone, shooting from inside the car, takes a clear and detailed video of the road showing plenty of visible light, which has better detail than the million-dollar optics package on the roof of the car. The video Uber released is designed to influence the viewer about what the driver and the car may or may not have been able to see, to give the impression that the lady appeared out of nowhere, and that the accident was her fault and not the fault of the driver. I don't even own any tinfoil and that much is obvious.
samnavy is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 02:42 PM
  #10759  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
I don't even own any tinfoil and that much is obvious.
How can you really be sure what the Navy is beaming into your brain though that fancy helmet with all the electronics in it?
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 03-23-2018, 09:17 PM
  #10760  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
Default

Pro tip:

After having led the police on a high-speed chase, and then deliberately setting your own car on fire while you are inside it, do not then jump out of the car and run towards the police while wielding a steakknife and screaming loudly. It tends to make them a tad shooty.

Joe Perez is offline  


Quick Reply: The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 PM.