Notices
Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 02:28 PM
  #9501  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I am by no means a firearms expert, but based on the audio in the recording taken from the balcony area, my impression is that this was a fully-automatic rifle.

In what was is that relevant to anything? Probably isn't since, you know, full-auto rifles are all but illegal.

I expect we'll soon hear people talking about select-fire conversion kits.
A few people I have talked to about this who are more into guns were saying it sounded more like bump shooting, then being fully auto. Their rational was that full auto sort of has a rhythm or consistent firing speed, while from the video's they had watched, it seemed like the speed of firing sped up and down slightly. Or they were thinking it was semi-auto firearms badly machined to be fully auto.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 02:46 PM
  #9502  
vitamin j's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 627
Total Cats: 79
From: Morrison, CO
Default

Yeah if you listen to the videos you know it's not just "a semi-auto being shot really fast." Crank trigger makes sense you can hear the ROF speed up and slow down for a few cycles. I just bought a bump fire stock and crank trigger today because I know they'll be next on the ban list.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 02:56 PM
  #9503  
mitymazda's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 276
Total Cats: 266
From: El Dorado/Sacramento
Default

Both of which are next to useless. Aimed controlled fire is where it is at. Full auto is for suppressing fire. Regardless millions of firearms are out there every day and more often then not they are used to protect rather then harm. I expect people to go full retard on this very fast. Bumpfire/slide fire are toys for enthusiasts and are not an issue. People will look at the guns when evil is the issue here.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 03:26 PM
  #9504  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

both are illegal. so like how did he do it?!
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 03:33 PM
  #9505  
vitamin j's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 627
Total Cats: 79
From: Morrison, CO
Default

No, they are legal as they still only result in 1 shot per 1 trigger pull. They've been on the ax-list for a few years now but are still legal. Unfortunately they are not useless for this type of crime.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 03:34 PM
  #9506  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I think someone called me heartless once cause I don't like the idea of oppressing a minority group in order for the majority to have cool things...







EXCLUSIVE: CBS Legal Exec Fired | The Daily Caller

A top legal executive at CBS was fired Monday for comments she made on a Facebook post that was first reported by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“If they wouldn’t do anything when children were murdered I have no hope that Repugs will ever do the right thing,” Geftman-Gold wrote on Facebook, ostensibly referring to Sandy Hook. “I’m actually not even sympathetic bc country music fans often are Republican gun toters.”

The reaction to her comments from CBS was swift.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 03:40 PM
  #9507  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Probably isn't since, you know, full-auto rifles are all but illegal.
Joe, you know better, but some people in this thread may not. I'll fill in the blanks.

Machine guns are illegal in (I think 12) some states. Of the states that allow ownership, there are restrictions that prohibit hunting with them and a few other things, but "mostly" there is nothing different about owning a machine gun as any other gun. The background check the ATF performs for a transfer is the same as for any other gun except it's performed manually buy a person rather than automatically by a computer. Sometimes a manual check reveals something not caught in a auto-check, but it's usually a matter of paperwork and not a disqualifying issue. Basically, if you can buy a regular gun, you can buy a machine gun.

You wouldn't say a Beech Staggerwing is "all but illegal" just because they are relatively rare and expensive.

Here's the Gunbroker spread... everything from an Uzi to a MaDeuce... how much money you got, and can you wait 8 months for the background check to clear? Plenty to choose from. Some people in this forum have more money in a bicycle than it takes to buy a machine gun.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Machine-Guns/BI.aspx
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 03:42 PM
  #9508  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

https://machinegunsvegas.com/
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 04:13 PM
  #9509  
stratosteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,067
Total Cats: 204
From: Marylandistan
Default

Fox news stated it was an illegally modified ar15
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 05:16 PM
  #9510  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

I usually stay out of this thread, but fwiw it sounds like a crank style from the audio. *loads next magazine*, and cranks away.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 05:22 PM
  #9511  
stratosteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,067
Total Cats: 204
From: Marylandistan
Default

Originally Posted by Girz0r
I usually stay out of this thread, but fwiw it sounds like a crank style from the audio. *loads next magazine*, and cranks away.

Yes, Google gat crank. Turns an ar15 into a simulated full auto by turning the little crank. In the video at the base of the hotel, the cyclic rate fluctuates like a crank would do.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 06:40 PM
  #9512  
Gee Emm's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,604
Total Cats: 248
From: Canberra, sort of
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
more gun control is always the first reaction. just like more funding for xyz.
If gun control is not the answer, what is? Or is this something that you will just live with - so many music fans this time, so many children another time, students, ... and so on into the future?

We had a tragedy, we did something. It seems to have worked to date, if it stops working hopefully we will do something to make it work again. What we did might not work for you, but we did something.

You have had tragedies too, and now another. Yet nothing seems to happen in response? Attempts at gun control are derided and opposed from within the gun community, without (it appears) any recognition that something might/could/should/must be done to avoid repeat events.

Is there no sense of community amongst gun owners? I mean that gun owners recognise the misuse of guns, the effects of this misuse, and the need for the community to act to protect itself? And that gun owners should be inside the tent, being part of the solution (if only to protect their interests).

I don't have answers for you, but I would have expected that you could find some answers for yourselves. In the absence of answers, it is self-evident that these events will be repeated, and that the only conclusion is that America is content to tolerate them as a price for ... something.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 06:43 PM
  #9513  
stratosteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,067
Total Cats: 204
From: Marylandistan
Default

Originally Posted by Gee Emm
If gun control is not the answer, what is? Or is this something that you will just live with - so many music fans this time, so many children another time, students, ... and so on into the future?

We had a tragedy, we did something. It seems to have worked to date, if it stops working hopefully we will do something to make it work again. What we did might not work for you, but we did something.

You have had tragedies too, and now another. Yet nothing seems to happen in response? Attempts at gun control are derided and opposed from within the gun community, without (it appears) any recognition that something might/could/should/must be done to avoid repeat events.

Is there no sense of community amongst gun owners? I mean that gun owners recognise the misuse of guns, the effects of this misuse, and the need for the community to act to protect itself? And that gun owners should be inside the tent, being part of the solution (if only to protect their interests).

I don't have answers for you, but I would have expected that you could find some answers for yourselves. In the absence of answers, it is self-evident that these events will be repeated, and that the only conclusion is that America is content to tolerate them as a price for ... something.
We?
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 07:56 PM
  #9514  
good2go's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,815
Total Cats: 1,237
Default

Originally Posted by stratosteve
We?
Based on location, Aussies, I take it.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 08:09 PM
  #9515  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

We have to be able to defend ourselves from crazies liberals.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 08:41 PM
  #9516  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

@Emm, AUS vs USA - "Doing" anything about it won't stop the gun violence. We're in too deep. IMO, it makes more sense to train everyday people about guns, encourage conceal carry where permitted.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 08:47 PM
  #9517  
Gee Emm's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,604
Total Cats: 248
From: Canberra, sort of
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
We have to be able to defend ourselves from crazies liberals.
This is a joke, right?

Who did the defending here - the police, the State.

You want anarchy on the streets? Disarming of the police? No a solution I see working, and I would not want to be visiting/living in such a place.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 08:50 PM
  #9518  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Liberals are the ones practicing anarchy in the streets. Gun toting Republicans are busy watching country music festivals.

Liberals want to dearm law abiding citizens so they can revolt, take over, then starve everyone to death.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 08:55 PM
  #9519  
Gee Emm's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,604
Total Cats: 248
From: Canberra, sort of
Default

Originally Posted by Girz0r
@Emm, AUS vs USA - "... We're in too deep.
It is a problem.

I don't know what the solution is, but I doubt that arming the citizenry is it. "We have a (gun) problem, and we are going to throw more guns at it" doesn't ring my bells, but I see it is sometimes put forward. Whatever the solution is, I hope it is found soon, and the bloodshed minimised.
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 08:57 PM
  #9520  
Gee Emm's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,604
Total Cats: 248
From: Canberra, sort of
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
Liberals are the ones practicing anarchy in the streets. Gun toting Republicans are busy watching country music festivals.

Liberals want to dearm law abiding citizens so they can revolt, take over, then starve everyone to death.
Gotcha.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 PM.