|
|
Re: batwoman
It's the left's job to make everyone equally unhappy. Her happiness and pride in the opportunity has been disallowed. |
Originally Posted by Skamba
(Post 1496287)
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496318)
how does this disprove it's a witch hunt?
I'm going to produce movie about the life of Andrew Kokoraleis, and cast an actor who is not a Satan-worshiping neo-Nazi serial killer, then arrange for the snowflakes to cry about how this is cultural appropriation or something like that. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496318)
how does this disprove it's a witch hunt?
In my personal opinion given how this document outlines it, nothing thus far has stepped outside those bounds, but dont take my word for it: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...-ruling-774888 Of course it would only take Rosenstien or Sessions re-issuing Muller's mandate to change that (i.e. they could just rewrite the rule book). |
Originally Posted by good2go
(Post 1496268)
" Get access to this story, and every story, on the web and in our apps with our Basic Digital subscription. "
No thanks |
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
(Post 1496360)
Obviously that would depend on your definition of the word, but generally when the justice department appoints a special prosecutor they are given a pretty wide berth to investigate anything which falls within their official mandate, in this case:
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496424)
again. How does the ruling disprove it's a witch hunt?
What makes you (or anyone) think that a witch-hunt is occurring in the first place? You keep asking for people to disprove something which, so far as I can tell, doesn't even exist. Being totally serious here. I think you're using hyperbole to expand the definition of "witch hunt" in a way which massively devalues the term. Kind of like how modern ultra-SJWs have devalued the word "rape" by applying it to "a cis-white male looked at me as I was walking down a public sidewalk." |
Because the entire investigation is a sham?
Let's say I paid someone to Photoshop a file to suggest that gluing quarters on pistons increased compression and was a viable solution. Then I had people distribute said file as imperial evidence. Are quarters not witches? You keep asking for people to disprove something which, so far as I can tell, doesn't even exist. https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...09&oe=5BF8C6E3 |
speaking of deaths:
SINCE THE NET NEUTRALITY REPEAL WAS ANNOUNCED, U.S. INTERNET SPEED HAS IMPROVED FROM THE 12TH BEST IN THE WORLD TO THE 6TH BEST by Kevin Ryan When FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced late last year that the so-called “net neutrality” regulations imposed during the Obama administration would be repealed, it set off a media firestorm. The left declared that your connection speed would be slowed significantly by internet service providers throttling back your service in order to extort higher fees out of you. Chairman Pai, on the other hand, said ending the onerous regulations would increase private technological investment and boost speeds, which had been flat since net neutrality was imposed. So, who was right? When the repeal was announced late last year, the U.S. had the 12th fastest fixed broadband service in the world: https://web.archive.org/…/www.sp…/global-index/united-states. Since the announcement, the U.S. has improved to the 6th fastest in the world: http://www.speedtest.net/global-index/united-states#fixed As you can see from the graph in this post, there was a definite upward bend in U.S. internet speed following the announcement. And data also shows increased technological investment by ISPs after the government said it would end the order regulating the internet as a public utility. When you tell the private sector how much it has to charge or who it must or must not enter into customer agreements with, it stifles innovation. Only when a buyer and seller are fully free to decide the terms of sale do both parties benefit. SOURCES: United States's Mobile and Broadband Internet Speeds - Speedtest Global Index https://nypost.com/…/no-the-end-of-net-neutrality-isnt-cyb…/ http://reason.com/…/net-neutrality-supporters-should-actuall http://www.insidesources.com/point-net-neutrality-bad-cons…/ http://pjmedia.com/…/fcc-commissioner-free-content-might-…/… http://www.forbes.com/…/fcc-plans-stealth-internet-tax-inc…/ http://www.internetfreedomcoalition.com/?p=4342 https://web.archive.org/…/www.sp…/global-index/united-states |
Those are some funny pictures.
Whites have been doing the "black face" thing since theater was introduced. Michael Jackson was doing the "white face" thing, so what? Posts like that to me are an example of people who give lip service to tolerance and understanding while actually being bigoted hate mongers. If pressed that woman will probably try to make light of it by saying it is a joke or some sort of parody, which it very well could be. What is actually happening on the woman's facebook post is public spewing of her hatred. Makes me wonder what sort of person she is when face to face. Personally I try to save my negative opinions to one person at a time rather than lumping a large group into one basket (police, whites, etc.) On that personal note I feel that Hillary and Trump are both disgusting human beings with no redeeming value to humanity. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496432)
speaking of deaths:
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496430)
Let's say I paid someone to Photoshop a file to suggest that gluing quarters on pistons increased compression and was a viable solution.
Then I had people distribute said file as imperial evidence. Are quarters not witches? Less serious answer: Do they weigh the same as a duck?
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496430)
Is that better than to investigate something which doesn't even exist?
That's kind of the point. From a legal perspective, you can't say "this doesn't exist" unless you have investigated it. |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 1496457)
That's kind of the point. From a legal perspective, you can't say "this doesn't exist" unless you have investigated it.
i have the perfect meme for this, hold on. |
meh, i cant find it, so enjoy this video.
Facebook Post |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496475)
But we know for fact, the article was photoshopped and paid fair...
I'm not arguing with you, I'm asking Skamba why he believes the Mueller investigation to be a witch hunt. I'm not even sure if you have a point which you're trying to make, other than to cloud the issue with talk of quarters and photoshop. Are you asserting that the CNN article about the Mueller investigation contains something which is photoshopped? |
The dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton admin and is the backbone of the entire investigation -- and absolutely nothing within it has been corroborated. It was completely fabricated in order to convince a judge to legally spy on Trump.
the dossier is the photoshopped article. keep up with the metaphors! |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496497)
The dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton admin and is the backbone of the entire investigation -- and absolutely nothing within it has been corroborated. It was completely fabricated in order to convince a judge to legally spy on Trump.
the dossier is the photoshopped article. keep up with the metaphors! Kinda curious how you'd have felt during the McCarthy investigations. |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 1496504)
Kinda curious how you'd have felt during the McCarthy investigations.
On another note... https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...f5049a9242.jpg |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1496497)
The dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton admin and is the backbone of the entire investigation -- and absolutely nothing within it has been corroborated. It was completely fabricated in order to convince a judge to legally spy on Trump.
the dossier is the photoshopped article. keep up with the metaphors! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%...er#Allegations Then again, VOX doesn't think so. https://www.vox.com/2018/1/5/1684570...r-russia-trump Too much for my brain to keep up on. |
Research the connections between Deripaska, Putin, Waldman, Solomon, Steele, Assange and Ohr.
Find the text messages between Ohr and Steele, after Steele's ties with FBI were publicly severed. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
|
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands