DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:49 AM
  #41  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
kewilso3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 318
Total Cats: 0
Default

Isnt a side effect of this location a possible boost spike/overboost? By the time location B sees 12 psi, there may be 16psi at point A on its way allready. (making up numbers here)... That was my rationalization for going with the compressor outlet location... I wanted to play it safe on the street so I opted for a slight performance loss in favor of more safety and simplicity.

I agree location B is probably best, just thought I'd mention this^
kewilso3 is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 04:25 PM
  #42  
Newb
 
miatex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

It makes all the sense in the world and excellent write up...!!

However boost spikes are really a possibility... Also the size of the IC is critical... it would be like the size of the straw, get a 2" hose and blow as hard as you can, and you will not feel resistance... Unless you are really good at blowing hahahahaha

I recently installed mine at the turbo nipple, and have seen steady boost, but I admit not going all the way to redline yet... Will do a run, as soon as I can, and will share!

miatex
miatex is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 05:03 PM
  #43  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,197
Total Cats: 1,136
Default

The reason the straw was use is because we have to downsize our example since our mouths, even though we're all Miata driving gays, are not as powerful as even the smallest of turbos.

My only issue with this idea is that I use the amount of boost drop off as an indicator as to how much my bolts have stretched, and therefore how much exhaust is leaking out between my turbo/manifold. The flanges need to be resurfaced, so it always sounds like there's a bit of a leak.
curly is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 05:36 PM
  #44  
Newb
 
miatex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by curly
The reason the straw was use is because we have to downsize our example since our mouths, even though we're all Miata driving gays, are not as powerful as even the smallest of turbos.
I understand, yet the I dea I was trying to portray was the fact that the IC flow capacity will play a major factor... High flow IC, and you may not notice such droop... tiny IC and the setup is absolutely necessary...

I will see how my setup resist the current 13psi target... thanks for the clarification tho.

miatex
miatex is offline  
Old 05-26-2010, 06:39 PM
  #45  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
chriscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Carrollton TX
Posts: 1,709
Total Cats: 15
Default

I don't see any evidence of my boost dropping at high rpm's. Admittedly, I tuned the gain on my Profec to maintain 12 psi to redline. In this scenario, is there any benefit to moving the signal source on the cold side of the IC?

C
chriscar is offline  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:45 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
WestfieldMX5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 999
Total Cats: 73
Default

If point C is such a bad thing, why does the MSM take its source at point C?
I believe the folks from FM also advice to use point C.
WestfieldMX5 is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 08:03 PM
  #47  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
chicksdigmiatas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas, 'Murica
Posts: 2,497
Total Cats: 0
Default

Fantastic write up Joe, my crusty ebay MBC actually recomends making a point b.
chicksdigmiatas is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 03:21 PM
  #48  
Newb
 
mx5jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 1
Default

The article makes a lot of sense to me - but I'm a musician, what the heck do I know? I wonder what comments Corky might have since his systems (and mine) seem to use point A?
mx5jon is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 03:27 PM
  #49  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

What happens when your wastegate and MBC does this:

Braineack is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 03:33 PM
  #50  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

You make moar power?
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 03:49 PM
  #51  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
You make moar power?
well played sir.
Braineack is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 04:13 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
inferno94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ON
Posts: 521
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
This is old, old knowledge, and just basic fluid dynamics, really. Seems like it's just one of those things that isn't obvious until somebody points it out. Hell, even I needed reminding (by Abe) a few years ago.
^Very true this was the setup that came on my old 323 gtx engine that was from '93. How is it that Mazda went to poorer designed systems on the newer cars? Less rallying and more Ford influence?
inferno94 is offline  
Old 06-23-2010, 04:16 PM
  #53  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Def an excellent post by Joe, as usual, but I feel like it should also address boost/power loss do to inadequate spring pressure on the Internal/External wastegate. From my exp and reading its generally not recommended to run boost pressures more than 1.5x your WG spring, regardless of boost control method. It will not cause your boost to drop off as much as it will cause you to spool much slower than you could if you have a more adequate spring for the boost you are running.

Further, I would say that 1.5x might even be too much when running an IWG with a small/crappy internal diaphragm. Say you are running 15psi. I would put my money down that you would see an increase in spool running a 15psi IWG vs a 10psi IWG. EWG can get away with more because they have much larger diaphragms and often run dual springs.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 07-14-2010, 01:59 PM
  #54  
Newb
 
Si Speed 317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 16
Total Cats: 0
Default

Great information.
Si Speed 317 is offline  
Old 07-14-2010, 06:46 PM
  #55  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Nagase's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,805
Total Cats: 2
Default

Any pictures of how to actually run the lines for this and labeled components? Seeing it would really help me, at least.
Nagase is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 12:13 PM
  #56  
Newb
 
miatasc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Majorca, Spain
Posts: 37
Total Cats: 0
Default

Excellent exposition, Joe

Thanx a lot.
Ben.
miatasc is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 12:16 PM
  #57  
Junior Member
 
Aricjm15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grayslake IL
Posts: 407
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by f_devocht
If point C is such a bad thing, why does the MSM take its source at point C?
I believe the folks from FM also advice to use point C.
The MSM, takes it from point B. It has a port on the side of the tube that attaches to the throttle body, from that port it goes to the boost control solenoid on the valve cover and onto then to the WG.
Aricjm15 is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 02:32 PM
  #58  
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
localtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 261
Total Cats: 0
Default

I have always used the port on the backside of my IM. It is the 1/4" port that the automatic transmission refrences the vacuum. That port is perfect. No boost spike. Smooth to 12# all day long no matter the rpm on my 1.8
localtech is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 02:53 PM
  #59  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by localtech
I have always used the port on the backside of my IM. It is the 1/4" port that the automatic transmission refrences the vacuum. That port is perfect. No boost spike. Smooth to 12# all day long no matter the rpm on my 1.8
that port is turbulent as hell when your MAP sensor is sourced off it.
Braineack is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 03:58 PM
  #60  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,656
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Originally Posted by localtech
I have always used the port on the backside of my IM. It is the 1/4" port that the automatic transmission refrences the vacuum. That port is perfect. No boost spike. Smooth to 12# all day long no matter the rpm on my 1.8
Yes it would be rock steady, but what is your turbo doing at engine loaded part-throttle cruise (uphill at 70mph on the highway)? To make 12psi in the manifold behind a partially closed throttle plate you might be making 30+psi at the compressor and huge amounts of excess heat for your intercooler to fight with. Plus you are restricting the airflow by forcing the turbine to fight the excess pressure that the compressor is seeing. I bet the turbine gets pretty hot at a cruise compared to one referenced at "point B". You should try switching it for a tankful and see if your mileage improves.
sixshooter is offline  


Quick Reply: Boost sag? No, you don't need EBC.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.