Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

DIY SS Bottom Mount Manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #41  
vw_nut's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 184
Total Cats: 0
From: Auburn Maine
Default

Can't you get stainless wire for MIG?
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #42  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by vw_nut
Can't you get stainless wire for MIG?
Yes but I would have to get gas to go with it. I'll only end up using the stainless wire and gas for this project most likely and then it will go to waste. I mean, if I can get the gas for like 40 bucks (ya right) then i'd prolly just do it.
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #43  
Stein's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
I mean, if I can get the gas for like 40 bucks (ya right) then i'd prolly just do it.
Or just give your $40 to sbkcocker and win.
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #44  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by Stein
Or just give your $40 to sbkcocker and win.
Exactly my point. The problem is that I might have to do it in 2 trips. I dont see how i'm going to be able to cut the holes for the middle 2 runners without the outter runners being welded together.
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 12:48 AM
  #45  
SKMetalworks's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,731
Total Cats: 4
From: Renton Washington
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
Exactly my point. The problem is that I might have to do it in 2 trips. I dont see how i'm going to be able to cut the holes for the middle 2 runners without the outter runners being welded together.
You know im a fabricator right???
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #46  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

I don't have time right now to read this whole thread and say how awesome you are doing, but based on the first post you are doign awesome. My first manifold was done just like yours, with a hack saw and those little 1" diameter dremel cutoff discs (a whole sleeve of them). So you're on the right track.

However, my biggest concern is that your turbo will hit the block. Those 1.5" pipe weld elbows are 2.25 radius, so you are about 2.75 away from the block when you include the flange...not gonna work, at least I don't think it will.

Sorry if this was mentioned already or you knew it. Tack it together and see if you got clearance with the turbine/motor mount bolts and the compressor/block.
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 06:08 PM
  #47  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
I don't have time right now to read this whole thread and say how awesome you are doing, but based on the first post you are doign awesome. My first manifold was done just like yours, with a hack saw and those little 1" diameter dremel cutoff discs (a whole sleeve of them). So you're on the right track.

However, my biggest concern is that your turbo will hit the block. Those 1.5" pipe weld elbows are 2.25 radius, so you are about 2.75 away from the block when you include the flange...not gonna work, at least I don't think it will.

Sorry if this was mentioned already or you knew it. Tack it together and see if you got clearance with the turbine/motor mount bolts and the compressor/block.
No, your'e right. Turbo will hit the block at this point definitely. I haven't decided if I want to rotate the collector out or if I want to add spacers in between the flange and the runners. Going to play with some things tomorrow.
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 11:34 PM
  #48  
Stein's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
No, your'e right. Turbo will hit the block at this point definitely.
Needs more tacos! LOL ld joke:

Seriously, that sucks. Bolt it on, hold stuff up to it and go from there. That's the joy of DIY. Just make it work.
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 12:40 AM
  #49  
Gotpsi?'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,260
Total Cats: 5
From: Central, TX / Bay area, CA
Default

Also, I used stainless weld els and wiertech mild steel flanges together. Use 309L filler rod to join the two with no problems. In a year now, I have seen no rust on my flanges to speak of and the stainless to mild joints have held up fine. It's been done by many people before me. Stainless flanges are 3X times the mild steel price.[/QUOTE]

I used this 309L rod on Friday on a pool heat exchanger and it worked great to join stainless to carbon steel. you might want to try and see if they make wire in that same material for your flanges and just have the rest TIGed by someone else.
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #50  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Got some more exercise today.

As Tim pointed out, the turbo was certainly going to hit the block. I decided to space the manifold out a bit, and also lift it a bit higher to make sure i'd miss the motor mount. To do this I basically just cut 1" straight pieces of pipe and taked them onto the manifold. Then turned my runners a few degrees so they were pointed up. I got the left runner cut and tacked into place. I started making my cut for the right runner and my hacksaw broke :(

I also started cleaning the metal before tacking it since its a lot easier than breaking the tacks later to clean it.

Pics:
Name:  DSC01557.jpg
Views: 147
Size:  89.7 KB
Name:  DSC01558.jpg
Views: 154
Size:  84.7 KB
Name:  DSC01560.jpg
Views: 151
Size:  123.2 KB
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 06:55 PM
  #51  
ARTech's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 526
Total Cats: 10
From: Dallas
Default

Those cheater cuts will hurt you. I think you're making this more complicated than it needs to be. Looks like you still have two good elbows. If I were you, I would scrap that idea and go with your first design. You just needed to rotate the collector forward. You're not gonna hit the motor mount.
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 06:59 PM
  #52  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by ARTech
Those cheater cuts will hurt you. I think you're making this more complicated than it needs to be. Looks like you still have two good elbows. If I were you, I would scrap that idea and go with your first design. You just needed to rotate the collector forward. You're not gonna hit the motor mount.
You sure? With the first design the thing hung really low. I'm also concerned with it hitting the steering stuff as well. At this point I need to get a new cutting device and just pull the car into the garage and use it to finish this. To difficult with just an engine on a table. Need to get it done by this weekend.
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #53  
ARTech's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 526
Total Cats: 10
From: Dallas
Default

Not 100% sure, but it's worth a try. These are the best pictures I could find for clearance:

Steering shaft:



Motor mount:



Yours sits lower so YMMV, but I don't think it will hit at the right angle. Tape it and test fit until it's just right.

A cutoff wheel in a grinder works well for making cuts. It'll need a little clean up but it cant be worse than a hacksaw
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #54  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

i agree with ARTech (as usual). dont do cheater cuts if for no reason than it looks cheated. rotate collector to the angle in ARTechs pics. tape and check or tack. And ABSOLUTELY get the $10 HF angle grinder & some $4 recessed cutoff wheels. goes infinitely quicker and less labor. trust me. been there done that dont rush it you are doing great!
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #55  
SKMetalworks's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,731
Total Cats: 4
From: Renton Washington
Default

Well I can say that you are showing dedication. Are you going to come down ?
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #56  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

A'ite you got me motivated enough to get off the couch. All I have is 1.8 geometry which is different, but hopefully this gets you close.

A 30° turbine flange angle from horizontal gets you a turbine shaft height almost dead nuts vertical and .262" lower than the standard Absurdflow low mount manifold. There should be clearance downwards, and if you aren't using a vband or .86 housing there should be lots of clearance with the motormount.
Attached Thumbnails DIY SS Bottom Mount Manifold-wayne_curr-assem1.jpg   DIY SS Bottom Mount Manifold-wayne_curr-assem2.jpg  
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 09:44 PM
  #57  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Holy ******* ****, thanks man. I've wished I had the skills to whip that up for a long time now lol.

Ok, you convinced me. I'll get rid of the cheater pieces, use my 2 remaining bends that are unmolested and use some straight pipe for the center runners.

Sbk, i'm going to be down this weekend but not sure if i'll have enough time to spend much time at your place. If I get this manifold done by then i'll come over, have a couple beers while you get started and prolly come back another day to pick it up. We'll see.
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 09:50 PM
  #58  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by wayne_curr
Holy ******* ****, thanks man. I've wished I had the skills to whip that up for a long time now lol.

Ok, you convinced me. I'll get rid of the cheater pieces, use my 2 remaining bends that are unmolested and use some straight pipe for the center runners.

Sbk, i'm going to be down this weekend but not sure if i'll have enough time to spend much time at your place. If I get this manifold done by then i'll come over, have a couple beers while you get started and prolly come back another day to pick it up. We'll see.
No problem. And thank you, looks like a new absurdflow maybe...less cutting than the standard...hehe.

If you're feeling adventurous and want to do the blended style, get me the bore spacing for the 1.6 and I'll throw those dims in, and get you the angles for the center primaries.

If not, I also did a quick straight pipe for the middle 2 primaries. That'd be easy.
Attached Thumbnails DIY SS Bottom Mount Manifold-wayne_curr-mani-blend-1.jpg   DIY SS Bottom Mount Manifold-wayne_curr-mani-blend-2.jpg   DIY SS Bottom Mount Manifold-wayne_curr-mani-simple-1.jpg  
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #59  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Wow, I dont know if I can pull off a 4 into 1 collector like that. But damn if that isn't bitchin. Although, I think i'd need a couple more bends for that since I already screwed a couple up with my earlier nonsense.

Here it is back to the original design. The only problem is that i'm still going to need to fill a 3/8th gap with a cheater piece.

Name:  DSC01565.jpg
Views: 143
Size:  111.9 KB
Name:  DSC01566.jpg
Views: 145
Size:  103.0 KB

I dont see a way around it unless I redo my collector completely which I dont have enough bends left to do, although your rendering is tempting me...

Edit: oh and the bore spacing (center to center, right?) is 3.5" by a quick eyeball with my tape measure. 1.5" between each bore edge to edge.
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 01:03 AM
  #60  
ARTech's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 526
Total Cats: 10
From: Dallas
Default

That's awesome Tim!

Wayne, a spacer is fine. That's not a cheated cut. A cheater cut is an angled cut not perpendicular to the center axis of the pipe (if that makes sense). I'm sure you noticed the pipe you cut at an angle ended up with a bigger, ovaled diameter that didn't quite match up to the other pipe.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 PM.