DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

gt28rs vs 19T vs 16g: getting parts ready

 
Old 01-14-2010, 12:35 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 201
Total Cats: 1
Default gt28rs vs 19T vs 16g: getting parts ready

So I'm coming up on the buildup for my stock 1.6. I have the parts ready to build a turbo manifold but I haven't decided on a turbo flange yet.

I currently have a stock wrx turbo that probably needs a rebuild, but I'm going to upgrade it to a 19T or just get one of the 16g variants from Blouch Turbo, depending on the price. The good thing is that once the turbo setup is built around the wrx turbo, any turbo from Blouch will fit right in.

I have the chance to get a gt28rs with the .86ar for ~$500 with a welded wastegate flapper, so after all is said and done going back to an internal gate, it'll be about the same price as the wrx turbo setup.

I'm building the car for track duty, but it'd be nice to have some midrange grunt for low-speed hairpins. It'll also be a street car on occasion, so take that into consideration.

I know the gt28rs is "too big" for street duty, but for the price, that's why I'm looking at getting it. Opinions on the 19t or 16g's?

Thanks for the help!
db84drteg is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 12:47 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southlake,Texas
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 17
Default

I wouldn't say a gt28 is too big for street use. Your stock 1.6 may have some trouble spooling it, but if you have a proper exhaust, decent manifold, and a good EWG, you could probably see decent spool before 4k.

Hustler is making 12psi at 3100 rpm of something like that with that same turbo. Then again, he has 1.9l and baller hotside parts.
Bond is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 12:50 PM
  #3  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,619
Total Cats: 2,316
Default

sigh. the gt2860 is a small turbo. the 1.6L wont have trouble spooling it. can you guys finally swallow that yet?
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 12:51 PM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southlake,Texas
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 17
Default

gurgling now...
Bond is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 12:54 PM
  #5  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,651
Total Cats: 111
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
sigh. the gt2860 is a small turbo. the 1.6L wont have trouble spooling it. can you guys finally swallow that yet?
WOW. Maybe the grand epiphany is coming.
__________________
DIYAutoTune.com Tech Support
10AE-T|BEGi S4|MSPNP-Pro EMS|Enthuza Duals|6UL|Etc
Track Rat|2001|VVT|MS3-Pro EMS|Enthuza|Exocet in Progress

Originally Posted by concealer404 View Post
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 12:55 PM
  #6  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,619
Total Cats: 2,316
Default

the only issue might be the .86, but there is evidence here against it.


specifically:


Originally Posted by Ben View Post
WOW. Maybe the grand epiphany is coming.
What like the sudden realization that I've been using a journal bearing turbo that's larger than a gt2860 for 5 years now without trouble spooling it?
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 01:43 PM
  #7  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,651
Total Cats: 111
Default

Nope. But every time I tell someone that the turbo they're looking at is too small, the peanut gallery comes in and tells me I'm the one who's nuts.
__________________
DIYAutoTune.com Tech Support
10AE-T|BEGi S4|MSPNP-Pro EMS|Enthuza Duals|6UL|Etc
Track Rat|2001|VVT|MS3-Pro EMS|Enthuza|Exocet in Progress

Originally Posted by concealer404 View Post
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 01:46 PM
  #8  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,619
Total Cats: 2,316
Default

well, it certainly ain't too small for a 250-300rwhp goal at least.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:01 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 201
Total Cats: 1
Default

Sounds good. I think I'll pick up the gt28. A lot of people told me on another project that a gt35 was too big for my friend's 99 integra gsr ... but he's hitting 10psi at 4krpm on a stock motor with integra type r cams.

Should I do a ramhorn style or log style manifold with an external wastegate or replace the exhaust housing and run the internal gate?
db84drteg is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:02 PM
  #10  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,619
Total Cats: 2,316
Default

compare the b16 head to a bp.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:45 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Auburn Maine
Posts: 184
Total Cats: 0
Default

Don't ignore the DSM 16g. You can buy them used dirt cheap. I've bought several for different projects and paid $200-300. It's a great street turbo for the $$. I don't know why you don't see people use them more.
vw_nut is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:48 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
Default

Originally Posted by vw_nut View Post
Don't ignore the DSM 16g. You can buy them used dirt cheap. I've bought several for different projects and paid $200-300. It's a great street turbo for the $$. I don't know why you don't see people use them more.
Lack of a quality off the shelf manifold comes to mind. Unfortunately you cant smash a td05 center section into a td04 hotside, otherwise I expect we'd see it quite a bit .
Jeff_Ciesielski is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:52 PM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

How does a 2860 compare to the 2871? I can read the specs, but this is where my knowledge really lacks. It's a 28 series. Are they considered comparable, or not even close?
miatauser884 is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:53 PM
  #14  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,619
Total Cats: 2,316
Default

the 2860 has a 60mm compressor wheel, the 2871 a 71mm.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:53 PM
  #15  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bellingham, Wa
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
compare the b16 head to a bp.
*cough*you mean b18*cough*
wayne_curr is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:09 PM
  #16  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 76,619
Total Cats: 2,316
Default

im not honda smart.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:26 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 221
Total Cats: -1
Default

honda are also capable of reving to 9k so full boost by say 4500 is more exceptable when you have that extra 2000rpms
94blackmx5 is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:30 PM
  #18  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,310
Total Cats: 2,019
Default

Originally Posted by djp0623 View Post
How does a 2860 compare to the 2871? I can read the specs, but this is where my knowledge really lacks. It's a 28 series. Are they considered comparable, or not even close?
60RS has a pretty limited efficiency range. It's tapped out around 35lb/hr (~320whp), but it's very efficient when you're in that 14-18psi range.

Name:  739548-1comp_e.jpg
Views: 217
Size:  43.6 KB

71R has MUCH more headroom, at least another 70whp. It hits a little bit harder than the 60RS but stays efficient at higher boost and power levels.

Name:  472560-15comp_e.jpg
Views: 227
Size:  44.7 KB

On a 1.9 liter, the 60RS will come on pretty smoothly and make big torque from ~3500 on. The 71RS will come on a tiny bit more abruptly, but it's capable of much more torque than the 60RS can dish out. Neither will have the instant response of a 2560, but the 2560 can't produce a torque curve like a potato is capable of.

If you want 300whp and no more, get the potato. If you want 350whp+, get the 2871R. Either way, get the .86 housing.

I'd like to try a 2860RS .64 on a 1.6 - I bet it would be much better suited to the smaller motor.
__________________

High-Performance Turbo Specialists - Sunnyvale, CA - Email us!

Originally Posted by codrus View Post
Basically I've come over to the camp of "If something is a reliability problem on the track, just ask Andrew and do what he says".
Savington is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:40 PM
  #19  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,319
Total Cats: 8
Default

This is with my China 2871 .64 at 16 psi with just an MBC. With my EBC I see 15 psi almost 500 rpm's sooner.

Name:  Philsnumbers.jpg
Views: 267
Size:  89.7 KB
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:54 PM
  #20  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,101
Total Cats: 368
Default

Savington,
My 1.9 made 15psi at 4400rpm with the log manifold, it makes that at 3200rpm with the AF parts. If we're talking dynojet-hp, then I agree with a gt2860rs for up to 300whp, but you'll need more compressor if you want 300whp on a real dyno with a log manifold.
hustler is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: gt28rs vs 19T vs 16g: getting parts ready


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.