Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

gt28rs vs 19T vs 16g: getting parts ready

Old Jan 14, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
db84drteg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 201
Total Cats: 1
Default gt28rs vs 19T vs 16g: getting parts ready

So I'm coming up on the buildup for my stock 1.6. I have the parts ready to build a turbo manifold but I haven't decided on a turbo flange yet.

I currently have a stock wrx turbo that probably needs a rebuild, but I'm going to upgrade it to a 19T or just get one of the 16g variants from Blouch Turbo, depending on the price. The good thing is that once the turbo setup is built around the wrx turbo, any turbo from Blouch will fit right in.

I have the chance to get a gt28rs with the .86ar for ~$500 with a welded wastegate flapper, so after all is said and done going back to an internal gate, it'll be about the same price as the wrx turbo setup.

I'm building the car for track duty, but it'd be nice to have some midrange grunt for low-speed hairpins. It'll also be a street car on occasion, so take that into consideration.

I know the gt28rs is "too big" for street duty, but for the price, that's why I'm looking at getting it. Opinions on the 19t or 16g's?

Thanks for the help!
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #2  
Bond's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

I wouldn't say a gt28 is too big for street use. Your stock 1.6 may have some trouble spooling it, but if you have a proper exhaust, decent manifold, and a good EWG, you could probably see decent spool before 4k.

Hustler is making 12psi at 3100 rpm of something like that with that same turbo. Then again, he has 1.9l and baller hotside parts.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #3  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

sigh. the gt2860 is a small turbo. the 1.6L wont have trouble spooling it. can you guys finally swallow that yet?
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
Bond's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

gurgling now...
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 12:54 PM
  #5  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
sigh. the gt2860 is a small turbo. the 1.6L wont have trouble spooling it. can you guys finally swallow that yet?
WOW. Maybe the grand epiphany is coming.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 12:55 PM
  #6  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the only issue might be the .86, but there is evidence here against it.


specifically:


Originally Posted by Ben
WOW. Maybe the grand epiphany is coming.
What like the sudden realization that I've been using a journal bearing turbo that's larger than a gt2860 for 5 years now without trouble spooling it?
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #7  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Nope. But every time I tell someone that the turbo they're looking at is too small, the peanut gallery comes in and tells me I'm the one who's nuts.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #8  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

well, it certainly ain't too small for a 250-300rwhp goal at least.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:01 PM
  #9  
db84drteg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 201
Total Cats: 1
Default

Sounds good. I think I'll pick up the gt28. A lot of people told me on another project that a gt35 was too big for my friend's 99 integra gsr ... but he's hitting 10psi at 4krpm on a stock motor with integra type r cams.

Should I do a ramhorn style or log style manifold with an external wastegate or replace the exhaust housing and run the internal gate?
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #10  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

compare the b16 head to a bp.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #11  
vw_nut's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 184
Total Cats: 0
From: Auburn Maine
Default

Don't ignore the DSM 16g. You can buy them used dirt cheap. I've bought several for different projects and paid $200-300. It's a great street turbo for the $$. I don't know why you don't see people use them more.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #12  
Jeff_Ciesielski's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,770
Total Cats: 31
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by vw_nut
Don't ignore the DSM 16g. You can buy them used dirt cheap. I've bought several for different projects and paid $200-300. It's a great street turbo for the $$. I don't know why you don't see people use them more.
Lack of a quality off the shelf manifold comes to mind. Unfortunately you cant smash a td05 center section into a td04 hotside, otherwise I expect we'd see it quite a bit .
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:52 PM
  #13  
miatauser884's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

How does a 2860 compare to the 2871? I can read the specs, but this is where my knowledge really lacks. It's a 28 series. Are they considered comparable, or not even close?
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #14  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the 2860 has a 60mm compressor wheel, the 2871 a 71mm.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #15  
wayne_curr's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,712
Total Cats: 5
From: Bellingham, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
compare the b16 head to a bp.
*cough*you mean b18*cough*
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #16  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

im not honda smart.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #17  
94blackmx5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 221
Total Cats: -1
From: maine
Default

honda are also capable of reving to 9k so full boost by say 4500 is more exceptable when you have that extra 2000rpms
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #18  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by djp0623
How does a 2860 compare to the 2871? I can read the specs, but this is where my knowledge really lacks. It's a 28 series. Are they considered comparable, or not even close?
60RS has a pretty limited efficiency range. It's tapped out around 35lb/hr (~320whp), but it's very efficient when you're in that 14-18psi range.

Name:  739548-1comp_e.jpg
Views: 912
Size:  43.6 KB

71R has MUCH more headroom, at least another 70whp. It hits a little bit harder than the 60RS but stays efficient at higher boost and power levels.

Name:  472560-15comp_e.jpg
Views: 899
Size:  44.7 KB

On a 1.9 liter, the 60RS will come on pretty smoothly and make big torque from ~3500 on. The 71RS will come on a tiny bit more abruptly, but it's capable of much more torque than the 60RS can dish out. Neither will have the instant response of a 2560, but the 2560 can't produce a torque curve like a potato is capable of.

If you want 300whp and no more, get the potato. If you want 350whp+, get the 2871R. Either way, get the .86 housing.

I'd like to try a 2860RS .64 on a 1.6 - I bet it would be much better suited to the smaller motor.
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #19  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

This is with my China 2871 .64 at 16 psi with just an MBC. With my EBC I see 15 psi almost 500 rpm's sooner.

Name:  Philsnumbers.jpg
Views: 1060
Size:  89.7 KB
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #20  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Savington,
My 1.9 made 15psi at 4400rpm with the log manifold, it makes that at 3200rpm with the AF parts. If we're talking dynojet-hp, then I agree with a gt2860rs for up to 300whp, but you'll need more compressor if you want 300whp on a real dyno with a log manifold.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 AM.