Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

My latest coolant reroute

Old Jun 8, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #21  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Actually there will always be flow through the two loops that flow through the turbo and the oil cooler, plus a little flow through the heater core thermostat as well due to the hole I drilled in it. That is important, since both thermostats need to see flow across the paraffin actuators so that they will 'know' when the engine is warm and open up.

In the diagram I show those lines connected to the 'upstream' side of the thermostat, probably not clear though.

On that freeze plug, dang it I wish I could remember. It is metric, I want to say 34mm. I do remember I had to go to O'Reilly to find one. Auto Zone and Advance did not have it. Cannot remember if NAPA does.

Last edited by ZX-Tex; Jun 8, 2009 at 02:46 PM.
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 02:33 PM
  #22  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

30mm, usually labeled as 30.05 or so. Autozone had 'em down where I live.
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #23  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Thanks Joe.

You know, back to my question about determining if there is enough flow through the engine while the thermostats are closed... The first time I start up the engine with this hooked up, I could log/watch the coolant temperature closely; the temperature sending units (stock and aftermarket gauge) are right at the back of the head, before the t-stat.

If the temperature suddenly jumped (or oscillated) at or near the thermostat opening temperature, this could be an indication that there were some pockets of hot coolant in the engine that were not circulating well with the rest of the constant-flow circulation (while the thermostat was closed).
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #24  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Alright, ill ask for a 30 (30.05), thanks.

Do you really trust two 3/8" lines and a little coolant going through some (1/8" or so I'm assuming) holes to supply enough coolant to your head for warm up? That doesn't seem like much.
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #25  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Yeah that is what I am not sure about. How much is really needed?
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #26  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Yes, the use of an oil T-stat was discussed with one of the companies that makes them, and it was concluded that due to the much lower viscosity of water, the coolant would pretty much bypass the thermostat all the time. (Oil thermostats never close completely- they have a bypass path designed to allow 10-15% "leakage" in order to maintain circulation through the whole system. With water instead of oil, you'd get closer to 100% leakage.)
You're thinking of using the wrong pair of ports. You can choose a pair of ports that have near zero leakage when hot.
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #27  
Miatamaniac92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 846
Total Cats: 0
From: Austin, TX yall
Default

Why don't you run the Turbo and Oil Cooler outlets to the radiator inlet?

Chris
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 06:26 PM
  #28  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Good question. I think they will flow more if they are connected at the pump inlet since the pressure should be a little lower there. Plus, though I doubt they will flow enough to significantly effect the engine warm up time, they will be circulating warm flow like the heater core does in the stock configuration.
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 09:23 AM
  #29  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

So, how do we solve this? I am about to route the heater return to the radiator inlet, but understand that the car may take ages to warm up on the street...
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #30  
bryanlow's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 291
Total Cats: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
If the heater core return goes into the lower hose, like stock, then (I think) there is too much flow that is not circulating through the radiator and the car runs hot. If the heater core return goes into the upper radiator hose, unregulated, then the car runs too cool for the street. The winters here in South Texas are not harsh so little heater core flow is not a big deal.
What do you consider too cool for the street? My reroute is kinda similar, just without the t-stat in the heater hose but I'm getting 195-200° temps in normal driving. Have you tried turning the heater on full blast when on track?
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #31  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

The car would take 15 minutes or more to get above 160-170F. And, the temperature would fluctuate greatly from 160-200 depending on if I was sitting at a light or on the highway. It is just not very stable.

I run the hard top so I really do not want a setup that relies on running the heater to keep the engine cooled off. Even with the windows down it would heat up the cockpit too much for me on a hot day.

I'm in the process of installing this reroute so I'll report back on how well it does once the car is running again. I am making several other cooling related changes as well so it will be hard to look at it as a back-to-back comparison. But, I think the logs of the coolant temps will still be useful data. I fabricated a thermostat housing for the heater core circuit using a spare thermostat cover and the thermostat housing I removed from the front of the engine. It looks to me like it will work well.

Last edited by ZX-Tex; Jun 21, 2009 at 04:52 PM.
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #32  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

I just put a valve in the heater core return that goes to the mixing manifold. Put it at 'almost closed'.

That, and I remolded the hood vent. Flushed all coolant with pure water.

Thursday's track day will tell if my temps stay lower now.
Attached Thumbnails My latest coolant reroute-23062009070.jpg   My latest coolant reroute-23062009072.jpg   My latest coolant reroute-23062009073.jpg   My latest coolant reroute-23062009074.jpg   My latest coolant reroute-23062009075.jpg  

My latest coolant reroute-23062009076.jpg  
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #33  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Spookyfish, is this somehow switching between returning the heater outlet to the mixing manifold and to the radiator inlet? Or are you just choking off the return to the radiator to speed up the warm up process, wouldn't that limit flow?
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #34  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

I think what he is doing is restricting flow through the heater core (and into the water pump via a stock mixing manifold type configuration) to a bare minimum. This will force most of the flow through the radiator return hose (and through the radiator) once the t-stat opens.

Do you have a coolant reroute with the thermostat at the back of the head? Seems like this would be a must for this setup, otherwise there will not be much flow through the back cylinders.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 01:04 AM
  #35  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
I think what he is doing is restricting flow through the heater core (and into the water pump via a stock mixing manifold type configuration) to a bare minimum. This will force most of the flow through the radiator return hose (and through the radiator) once the t-stat opens.
Correct. Just enough flow for warmup. After that, maximum flow through the radiator.

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
Do you have a coolant reroute with the thermostat at the back of the head? Seems like this would be a must for this setup, otherwise there will not be much flow through the back cylinders.
In fact, I have a front AND rear exit. I want to cap off the front still, but haven't done that yet. Both exits mix at the top radiator inlet.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 01:05 AM
  #36  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by curly
Spookyfish, is this somehow switching between returning the heater outlet to the mixing manifold and to the radiator inlet? Or are you just choking off the return to the radiator to speed up the warm up process, wouldn't that limit flow?
None of that. Just limiting flow through the heater core return that goes to the water pump/mixing manifold.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 10:15 AM
  #37  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
I want to cap off the front still, but haven't done that yet. Both exits mix at the top radiator inlet.
Freeze plug that bitch already!
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 10:18 AM
  #38  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
Freeze plug that bitch already!
Nah, too much trouble. My turbo sees coolant from that spot. I will use a block off plate. Someone needs to make me one.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #39  
kotomile's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
From: Monterey, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Spookyfish
Nah, too much trouble. My turbo sees coolant from that spot. I will use a block off plate. Someone needs to make me one.

+

+

+
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 12:41 PM
  #40  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by kotomile

+

+

+
I know, just haven't found thick enough Al plate around here that isn't an acre in size.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 AM.