Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Need Turbocharger Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 11:38 PM
  #21  
Arkmage's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,895
Total Cats: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

the compressor map for the 50 trim t3 looks like poop over 230 hp or so... but as mentioned in my dyno thread i'm pretty sure my turbine is too small.

pat: for your power goals I'd recommend a .63 turbine with a 50 trim to4e, that's what I'm planning to upgrade to in the future and it should support around 350 whp, more than that and you'll want to port the turbine (stage II/III) and maybe go up to a 57/60 trim t4 compressor.

you make no mention of building your bottom end for you end goal. are you planning on running turbo + nitrous @ over 300 whp without a bottom end build?
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #22  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Yea, planing to run a stock bottom end for 1 year. That's the turbo I'm considering running. You mention that over 350whp, a compressor upsize would be favorable. If I were to buy the larger compressor now, what would be the downside? Would it just hurt spool? Reason I ask is I'd like to buy it once and be done. If we're talking say 200 RPM difference in spool I could live with that. I'll have nitrous to get it going anyway when it matters.
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 12:21 AM
  #23  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Yea, planing to run a stock bottom end for 1 year.
Bud, you've been here long enough that I hope you know that a stock bottom end isn't going to like 300whp and nitrous on top of that for long...
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 12:34 AM
  #24  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Bud, you've been here long enough that I hope you know that a stock bottom end isn't going to like 300whp and nitrous on top of that for long...
Where's Paul? He's doing it. I'm not gonna spray all for adding hp, just to spool a big turbo at 3K instead of 5K. I know that's gonna be tough on it for sure, and truth be told I'd love to just push it to see what it will take. Say, get it to 300whp, then once my progressive WI and every other supporting thing is dialed in, just crank up the boost and see what it will take. With a conservative redline I bet I could sit around 350whp for year.
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 01:14 AM
  #25  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Where's Paul? He's doing it. I'm not gonna spray all for adding hp, just to spool a big turbo at 3K instead of 5K. I know that's gonna be tough on it for sure, and truth be told I'd love to just push it to see what it will take. Say, get it to 300whp, then once my progressive WI and every other supporting thing is dialed in, just crank up the boost and see what it will take. With a conservative redline I bet I could sit around 350whp for year.
Paul is at 270. You have fun with stock rods and 350whp.
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #26  
patsmx5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Paul hit 300 at the dyno day thingy. Bell seems to think RPM's are what kill stock rods, not HP. We'll see...
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 01:50 AM
  #27  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

We certainly will. Hats off if you make it a year at 350whp on stock rods.
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 05:27 AM
  #28  
lazzer408's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,011
Total Cats: 7
From: Illinois
Default

fwiw I run a home-brew saab/international T3/T4. It's a T3 .48 (unknown trim) turbine with a T4 .60 60t compressor and it moves too much air. =) I'm shooting for 450hp+ and I'm pretty sure my compressor will do it. The turbine on the other hand is too small at .48 but it spools the T4 pretty quick. Thing sounds like a jet. I should put up some av clips. I'm looking for opinions on turbines as well. I'm waiting to hear from mjm with their opinion.
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 08:14 AM
  #29  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Arkmage
the compressor map for the 50 trim t3 looks like poop over 230 hp or so... but as mentioned in my dyno thread i'm pretty sure my turbine is too small.

pat: for your power goals I'd recommend a .63 turbine with a 50 trim to4e, that's what I'm planning to upgrade to in the future and it should support around 350 whp, more than that and you'll want to port the turbine (stage II/III) and maybe go up to a 57/60 trim t4 compressor.
a .48 T3 turbine housing is plenty big (17 lb/min)....equivalent of a .63 A/R T25 housing, and we all know those get the job done just fine. The .63 T3 housing will be larger (21 lb/min) than you need on most setups, but Pat can make due however. There are a lot of us with T3s and T3/T4 with the .48 housing and no torque/boost loss at redline making over 250rwhp. Remember 97.7 x 7000 / 3456 = 197 CFM or 13.5 lb/min, no reason to get a housing design for 21 lb/min when you can't produce near that amount of airflow.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FAB
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
216
Mar 22, 2017 04:00 PM
Model192
Meet and Greet
16
Sep 29, 2015 08:50 PM
compuw22c
MEGAsquirt
0
Sep 14, 2015 06:08 PM
Marcdasharq
Meet and Greet
2
Sep 11, 2015 12:21 AM
turboLuigi
Meet and Greet
2
Sep 4, 2015 01:29 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 PM.