DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Wastegate signal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2008, 12:59 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
oilstain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 812
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by airbrush1
ahh! Corky Speaks!
...cryptically...
oilstain is offline  
Old 09-13-2008, 01:54 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
compy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AC, NJ
Posts: 345
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by corky bell
it still seems to me the greatest turbo respnse will occur when absolutely no signal ever reaches the gate. That might suggest that the most distant source would respond the best.
ebc ftw
compy is offline  
Old 09-13-2008, 05:23 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
Thucydides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fairfield, California
Posts: 436
Total Cats: -7
Default

Originally Posted by oilstain
...cryptically...
Yeah, he's like that dude who retired from the FED, Alan Greenspan. Greenspan would say something nobody could understand but that they could all interpret anyway they wanted and billions would be made and lost on the world markets.

In Corky's case, that's just how engineers talk. I think it means, "the info's out there, here's some more, figure out what works for your situation."

Last edited by Thucydides; 09-13-2008 at 05:39 PM.
Thucydides is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 03:55 PM
  #24  
Newb
 
MeOughtta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 31
Total Cats: 0
Default

Flogging a dead horse...

Compressor outlet: tightest control, but boost at throttle plate will fall off at high RPM because there is no measurement/compensation for pressure drop across the I/C. Worth considering a way to modestly reduce the effective boost at high RPM as a cap to the maximum stress on the engine.

Plenum: slightly looser (and possibly less stable) boost control, but maintains constant boost at the throttle plate across entire RPM range.

Intake Manifold: Maximum responsiveness when opening the throttle, but lousy on a) throttle linearity and b) heat/efficiency at partial throttle because the compressor output may climb very much higher than the target boost level. Example: a) boost target of 15 psi, b) engine at partial throttle with 3 psi boost in the intake manifold, requires c) 25 psi pressure in the plenum side of the throttle late resulting in d) huge backpressure on the exhaust side of the engine, but e) the still the wastegate remains closed -- trying to build even more boost -- because the WG signal is still 12psi below the boost target.

M.
MeOughtta is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 10:03 PM
  #25  
Newb
 
spoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24
Total Cats: 0
Default

Good thread!

Many DSMs tap into the BOV line, which itself is sourced from the intake manifold. I've been running this setup myself for the better part of 6-7 years now. With a ball-spring MBC hooked up in the signal line, is there still a risk to the wastegate actuator canister?

spoom is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 10:05 PM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
KPLAFIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VA, Germany, Afghanistan
Posts: 2,945
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by spoom
Good thread!

Many DSMs tap into the BOV line, which itself is sourced from the intake manifold. I've been running this setup myself for the better part of 6-7 years now. With a ball-spring MBC hooked up in the signal line, is there still a risk to the wastegate actuator canister?

That seems like a really bad idea to me....

The wastegate/mbc should have their own dedicated vacuum source.
KPLAFIN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Corky Bell
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
18
11-22-2016 09:01 PM
itsMikey
MSPNP
3
09-28-2015 06:40 AM
Dobzeh
ECUs and Tuning
5
09-17-2015 02:56 PM



Quick Reply: Wastegate signal



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 PM.