Notices

Hit the dyno again....

Old Nov 20, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #21  
miatamania's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,160
Total Cats: 6
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

Nicely done.
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #22  
stubbs's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by paul
cut off wheel. die grinder, and many hours. also had to have some holes filled after removing the shaft for the vics butterfiles and egr.
Well it's VERY impressive. Like I said you have the wheels turning in my brain. How was driveabilty effected. Was the car any more sluggish or was their a noticeable loss of low end torque or power? Or was it fairly similar in the low end with just more pull up top?
I have a 2000 so I have no VICS setup, that being the case would I not have to do some filler welding if I was to port a 1999-2000 manifold in your estimate if I was to continue using the EGR?
How much lighter is the complete(upper and lower) manifold now?
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #23  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by stubbs
Well it's VERY impressive. Like I said you have the wheels turning in my brain. How was driveabilty effected. Was the car any more sluggish or was their a noticeable loss of low end torque or power? Or was it fairly similar in the low end with just more pull up top?
I have a 2000 so I have no VICS setup, that being the case would I not have to do some filler welding if I was to port a 1999-2000 manifold in your estimate if I was to continue using the EGR?
How much lighter is the complete(upper and lower) manifold now?

You have a 2000 so you have no VICS setup? Explain.
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #24  
stubbs's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by paul
You have a 2000 so you have no VICS setup? Explain.
I was told only 2001 and newer cars had VICS.
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #25  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by stubbs
I was told only 2001 and newer cars had VICS.
You were misinformed.

99-00's had VICS

01-05's had no VICS, but they had some other little set of butterflies, but they were not VICS, but rather a choke to enhance cold start. Once the engine warms up they open and are merely an obstruction, hurting power, and definitely not helping. So VICS is the preferred stock intake manifold. But a gutted out vics manifold may prove to make more hp.
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 10:39 AM
  #26  
stubbs's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
You were misinformed.

99-00's had VICS

01-05's had no VICS, but they had some other little set of butterflies, but they were not VICS, but rather a choke to enhance cold start. Once the engine warms up they open and are merely an obstruction, hurting power, and definitely not helping. So VICS is the preferred stock intake manifold. But a gutted out vics manifold may prove to make more hp.
OK I see you are right, I just did some quick research. It's the Variable valves that I was thinking of on the 2001 and newer cars. So that means I would have to have welding done to fill those VICS holes...

Maybe I will just see what the new Begi manifold will retail far...
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #27  
JayL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,881
Total Cats: 2
From: Austin, TX
Default

Hey stubbs, any chance that you also have a Ford Lightning?
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #28  
stubbs's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by JayMX5
Hey stubbs, any chance that you also have a Ford Lightning?
Many years ago, 1st Generation one. My Ford that was my baby was my 1992 Mustang that was stolen in 2000, I had 70 grand into that car
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #29  
JayL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,881
Total Cats: 2
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by stubbs
Many years ago, 1st Generation one. My Ford that was my baby was my 1992 Mustang that was stolen in 2000, I had 70 grand into that car
I thought I knew the screen name from somewhere.
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #30  
stubbs's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by JayMX5
I thought I knew the screen name from somewhere.
Well I'm on about 60 forums and always stubbs on all of them, so it very well may be me you are thinking of...
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #31  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

so Jay, did you call Dyno Dynamics yet and ask them what effect would going from 100@120 to 100@150 would do?
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #32  
JayL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,881
Total Cats: 2
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
so Jay, did you call Dyno Dynamics yet and ask them what effect would going from 100@120 to 100@150 would do?
I haven't heard anything back from them yet. I have left a couple of messages on their tech support voice mail. I talked with the guy who owns the dyno and he said it would make a difference, but wasn't sure on how much. I might just take the car to some place with a dynojet and see what it can do.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JasonC SBB
ECUs and Tuning
11
Oct 27, 2015 04:56 PM
The Gleas
MEGAsquirt
3
Oct 1, 2015 09:30 AM
ihiryu
General Miata Chat
9
Sep 28, 2015 10:22 AM
Voltwings
Cars for sale/trade
0
Sep 27, 2015 06:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.