M2cupcar t3/t4 50trim 2.0L (302rwhp)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2008, 04:58 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,482
Total Cats: 372
Default M2cupcar t3/t4 50trim 2.0L (302rwhp)

Bone stock FE-dohc 2.0L with FE3n cams (not the worst nor the best) on pump gas. I made four runs total at 16psi (what I've been tuning/running on the street). 20+hp and 10+ftlbs gain from runs 1-3. Tried more timing to pick up the top end HP on a fourth run but the torque fell off. Injectors were at 82% on the third run. I suppose I could have played around with the tuning more but I think the engine just needs more air (cams, throttle body - to replace the 1.6 tb ). I'd rather make the same power with less boost, which I know it possible as some of the fwd FEs are doing the same power at 13-14psi with similar turbos.

m2cupcar is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:03 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,292
Total Cats: 475
Default

Sa-weet! I bet that's a hoot to drive. Videos! And can you post your timing map?
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:04 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

I'd love to have a look at your map too Rob.
jayc72 is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:08 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
TURNS101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 715
Total Cats: 5
Default

That looks great.
I hope I can get mine to look like that.

How is that 100ftlbs jump from 3500 to 4500 Sweeet

I may have missed this, but what exhaust are you running? I would think that would spool up a bit quicker than that with a 2liter.
TURNS101 is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:15 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

I'm sure the 1.6 tb and plenium are choking the motor some. Don't expect to hit the same numbers as a fwd car though even with the same engine. FWD will always have less drivetrain loss vs RWD.

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
Bone stock FE-dohc 2.0L with FE3n cams (not the worst nor the best) on pump gas. I made four runs total at 16psi (what I've been tuning/running on the street). 20+hp and 10+ftlbs gain from runs 1-3. Tried more timing to pick up the top end HP on a fourth run but the torque fell off. Injectors were at 82% on the third run. I suppose I could have played around with the tuning more but I think the engine just needs more air (cams, throttle body - to replace the 1.6 tb ). I'd rather make the same power with less boost, which I know it possible as some of the fwd FEs are doing the same power at 13-14psi with similar turbos.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:24 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,482
Total Cats: 372
Default

I think the strongest run was max advance of 18*. I'll dig up my map and post a screen shot and the file.

I've got an OE Mercedes internal WG with a helper spring and 2.5" exit, then it steps right up to 3" all the way out. I'm running a 200 cell metal cat, 18" glass pack resonator and a "Raptor" turbo style muffler. Exhaust runs in around 360* and back out. Car is very quiet.

The fwd car made 314 @ 13psi with a log manifold, external gate and modern engine management.

Looking at the power curve, I think there's some things that can be done outside the engine (like a the 1.6 TB) to gain some top end. I'm also running half a 1.6 mani welded to the sportage mani, so there's probably some choke there. A mani was on the list before the pull.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:36 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
TURNS101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 715
Total Cats: 5
Default

I think it looks good.
Looks like a lot of fun
TURNS101 is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:52 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

Good numbers Rob, glad to see you're FI again!
kotomile is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:53 PM
  #9  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

This is very odd. what kind of dyno was that?

y8s is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 07:48 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Fireindc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Taos, New mexico
Posts: 6,597
Total Cats: 559
Default

Ive always loved your car. Awesome numbers, any current pics?
Fireindc is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 08:31 PM
  #11  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Wanna trade?!
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-11-2008, 11:07 AM
  #12  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,482
Total Cats: 372
Default

Y8s- it's the dynojet at BalancedPerformance. I think it's the same one Doppleganger used (and the same tuner). Ahhh... our power curves are related, except your's keeps it's chin up on the high end. Where's my cake?

You can definitely feel the load go to the trunk on that torque rise.

It is fun... until the transmission lets go. I need to figure out the driveline before I spend time on improving the high rpm power.

You will drive it at the Inaugural MT East Coast dyno day.

Anybody know what the LINK correction factor is? I'd like to adjust my power curve for running such a crappy ecu.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 10-11-2008, 11:50 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jayc72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 4,908
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar

Anybody know what the LINK correction factor is? I'd like to adjust my power curve for running such a crappy ecu.
I don't know, you must have one of the rare Links, 'cause everyone knows they suck.

I haven't spent a lot of time tuning (or driving it, damn babies) my Miata since putting the new gear on it. Could you describe your method of tuning the link while on the dyno? How much power did you pick up while on the dyno, over your street tuning?

Jay
jayc72 is offline  
Old 10-11-2008, 01:59 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,482
Total Cats: 372
Default

And then there's the stock 1.6 ign correction factor.

For street tune, I've got a loop near me where I can check for radar on the way out and then turn around and come back, datalogging a run from 1500-7k in fourth gear. Over the last year and half I mostly adjusted the fuel based on the LC1 data. I aimed for 11.5-6 at 16psi. Only on the last two street logs did I bump timing and only by 1/2 degree.

Basically did the same thing on the dyno, but the timing was bump 2* per run and the fuel was adjusted per the tuner's recommendations for a VERY safe tune. So using DLL create a new log file from the NEW menu, click OK and it starts logging. Hit "Q" when done and then open up the log and look at the results tuning accordingly.

The problem with tuning on the street around here is it's hard to find a break in traffic and I fear getting near anybody with a higher speed differential. On the dyno, you don't even have to look where you going.

It took about an hour and half (lots of bench racing) and the gains were 20+hp and 10+ torque. I can't say on the gains for the street over previous because of the parts changes. But the first dyno session way back was what brought to light my high intake air temps.

I think what I did on the dyno could be done in a car, just more difficult and in my case more time consuming.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 10-12-2008, 09:03 AM
  #15  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,482
Total Cats: 372
Default ign table and map file

Most of the boosted zones outside of my curve are based on tuning for my curve. I haven't actually gone through and tuned by centering my boost target on each zone row. Tuner did say it's a disadvantage that the LINK's rpm breaks are user configurable. For example, I really have no use for zones 10-25 in row 600, but could definitely use that space further up in the rpm band. Tuning an entire 500rpm block with one figure is adequate, but far from ideal.
Attached Thumbnails M2cupcar t3/t4 50trim 2.0L (302rwhp)-1010fe3ignmap.gif  
Attached Files
File Type: zip
finalmap1010.zip (647 Bytes, 77 views)
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 10-12-2008, 09:52 AM
  #16  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

I also have an above normal drop in torque (compared to other plots around here). I attribute it to my gutted MAF, smallish air filter and OEM cat (that one first). What is your intake/exhaust like?
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 10-12-2008, 10:52 AM
  #17  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,482
Total Cats: 372
Default

Exhaust is 3" all the way out from the 2.5" exit on the internal wg housing. Includes a 200 cell metal cat, 18" glass pack and a fairly restrictive 3" muffler:


I was going to make a run w/o it but just ran out of time... and it was quite hot. I think the manifold is probably the biggest issue.
m2cupcar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FAB
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
216
03-22-2017 04:00 PM
Miatamaniac92
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
4
04-23-2009 09:58 AM
Ben
Miata parts for sale/trade
4
12-01-2008 09:50 PM
ApexOnYou
Dynos and timesheets
39
07-25-2008 01:51 AM
evosol
General Miata Chat
7
11-08-2006 03:02 PM



Quick Reply: M2cupcar t3/t4 50trim 2.0L (302rwhp)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 AM.