New Innovate LC-2 wideband
#61
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Innovate sucks. When I was on my 3rd LC-1 in 2 cars it was all whacked out. I called them for assistance and they talked me into trying a new sensor. Then, after I gave them another $60 for the sensor, they decided the controller was dead. Rather than offer-up any type of warranty or customer loyalty discount, they told me to go away and pay full price.
Then I wised-up and bought an AEM. No Rube Goldberg of ground wires. Just power, ******* ground, ******* signal, **** yeah. It works, three wires, done. Hopefully when the AEM breaks they treat me better than Innovate, which won't be difficult even if the company is blasted by an asteroid and ceases to exist.
Then I wised-up and bought an AEM. No Rube Goldberg of ground wires. Just power, ******* ground, ******* signal, **** yeah. It works, three wires, done. Hopefully when the AEM breaks they treat me better than Innovate, which won't be difficult even if the company is blasted by an asteroid and ceases to exist.
#62
Really how Rube Goldberg is this 2 ground connection?:
- Connect the signal ground wire to the ECU signal ground pin.
- Connect the power ground wire to the head or block.
It is the correct engineering solution to the problem of having an analog output on a wideband.
#63
Innovate sucks. When I was on my 3rd LC-1 in 2 cars it was all whacked out. I called them for assistance and they talked me into trying a new sensor. Then, after I gave them another $60 for the sensor, they decided the controller was dead. Rather than offer-up any type of warranty or customer loyalty discount, they told me to go away and pay full price.
Then I wised-up and bought an AEM. No Rube Goldberg of ground wires. Just power, ******* ground, ******* signal, **** yeah. It works, three wires, done. Hopefully when the AEM breaks they treat me better than Innovate, which won't be difficult even if the company is blasted by an asteroid and ceases to exist.
Then I wised-up and bought an AEM. No Rube Goldberg of ground wires. Just power, ******* ground, ******* signal, **** yeah. It works, three wires, done. Hopefully when the AEM breaks they treat me better than Innovate, which won't be difficult even if the company is blasted by an asteroid and ceases to exist.
Even if you dont waste time grounding them properly run the gauge and the controller grounds together and run digital signal to the ecu.
As far as the sensor... you can go to vatozone and buy one off the store. i think it was 54 bucks. As far as the warranty, AEM will tell u the same thing.
#64
Hate to say it big guy but theres so much fail in those 2 paragraphs... you're using resistance sensitive equipment on something that changes resistance with temperature and continuous use. If the ground wires are such a pain in the *** where you would go with AEM just to not deal with it why run a wideband at all? Just bury your head in the sand and hope ur **** dont blow.
Even if you dont waste time grounding them properly run the gauge and the controller grounds together and run digital signal to the ecu.
As far as the sensor... you can go to vatozone and buy one off the store. i think it was 54 bucks. As far as the warranty, AEM will tell u the same thing.
Even if you dont waste time grounding them properly run the gauge and the controller grounds together and run digital signal to the ecu.
As far as the sensor... you can go to vatozone and buy one off the store. i think it was 54 bucks. As far as the warranty, AEM will tell u the same thing.
You guys are getting so carried away with this crap I can just see in the near future people making statements like " aem wideband = bandaids and piggy backs"......."bolt it on if you want your car to blow up"....etc..
Yeah we get it: its not as fast and averages out values at times. Hundreds of thousands of cars are running them, are tuned with them, and have zero issues. Every car I tuned before my current had an aem.
Stop being so dramatic.
PS: I'm using the innovate mtx right now. Not bad, but I hate the yellow lighting and I HATE HATE HATE HATE how long it takes for this stupid thing to warm up. Hopefully the lc2 improves on that, and if so I'll probably try one.
#65
The difference in resistance from grounding it to the body by the shifter to the block or to the ecu is about 1 point on the afr scale. This means instead of tunning for 12 afr you're really running at 13 afr at 20psi
Hmm i've never used the mtx. i always thought the mtx was just the gauge but with the same controller as everything else? I'm using the DB gauge with the LC1 controller... takes all of 30 seconds to warm up and give me a reading. If i am focusing on cranking values or warmup enrichments i have a bypass switch that can manually turn it on full time or turn it off completely. That way the sensor is already warmed up and showing me readings while i'm cranking and right after.
Hmm i've never used the mtx. i always thought the mtx was just the gauge but with the same controller as everything else? I'm using the DB gauge with the LC1 controller... takes all of 30 seconds to warm up and give me a reading. If i am focusing on cranking values or warmup enrichments i have a bypass switch that can manually turn it on full time or turn it off completely. That way the sensor is already warmed up and showing me readings while i'm cranking and right after.
Last edited by triple88a; 09-27-2013 at 04:49 AM.
#66
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Hate to say it big guy but theres so much fail in those 2 paragraphs... you're using resistance sensitive equipment on something that changes resistance with temperature and continuous use. If the ground wires are such a pain in the *** where you would go with AEM just to not deal with it why run a wideband at all? Just bury your head in the sand and hope ur **** dont blow.
Even if you dont waste time grounding them properly run the gauge and the controller grounds together and run digital signal to the ecu.
As far as the sensor... you can go to vatozone and buy one off the store. i think it was 54 bucks. As far as the warranty, AEM will tell u the same thing.
Even if you dont waste time grounding them properly run the gauge and the controller grounds together and run digital signal to the ecu.
As far as the sensor... you can go to vatozone and buy one off the store. i think it was 54 bucks. As far as the warranty, AEM will tell u the same thing.
Yes, I could have gone to Vato zone but Innovate guy told me to use his sensor, I had him on the phone, so I ordered. However, he incorrectly diagnosed the problem and I was out more money with no respite.
If this one fails in 3 years, I'll buy a different wideband. Electronics should last longer than three years. Companies should care enough to treat customers better, so I moved on.
I tuned my car with the AEM and saw no changes in AFR compared to the LC-1 on the Dyno. I also tracked the car hard for a long time and saw no variation in readings at WOT. I have not seen a 1-point change in my car from idle on the grid to 20-seconds of WOT at TWS on the front stretch.
#68
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
What if we alligator clip the ground to a chicano-antenna? That might bolster your argument and assuage the homosexual thought for a moment. Only for a moment though, because we know you crave the warmth of a man. You're a dirty twink, you need the sin.
#69
The difference in resistance from grounding it to the body by the shifter to the block or to the ecu is about 1 point on the afr scale. This means instead of tunning for 12 afr you're really running at 13 afr at 20psi
Hmm i've never used the mtx. i always thought the mtx was just the gauge but with the same controller as everything else? I'm using the DB gauge with the LC1 controller... takes all of 30 seconds to warm up and give me a reading. If i am focusing on cranking values or warmup enrichments i have a bypass switch that can manually turn it on full time or turn it off completely. That way the sensor is already warmed up and showing me readings while i'm cranking and right after.
Hmm i've never used the mtx. i always thought the mtx was just the gauge but with the same controller as everything else? I'm using the DB gauge with the LC1 controller... takes all of 30 seconds to warm up and give me a reading. If i am focusing on cranking values or warmup enrichments i have a bypass switch that can manually turn it on full time or turn it off completely. That way the sensor is already warmed up and showing me readings while i'm cranking and right after.
Ok now i are getting scared.
My LC-1 is running on a stock ECU car, but i AM using narrowband simulation to feed the stock ECU. Wideband signal is being used for display purposes only.
I didn't ground my **** to the ECU or the block. I have an aux fuse block that i use to power things like this, and there's a ground lug on it as well. Drawing directly to battery.
Is my wideband DISPLAY 1 point off?
#71
Ok now i are getting scared.
My LC-1 is running on a stock ECU car, but i AM using narrowband simulation to feed the stock ECU. Wideband signal is being used for display purposes only.
I didn't ground my **** to the ECU or the block. I have an aux fuse block that i use to power things like this, and there's a ground lug on it as well. Drawing directly to battery.
Is my wideband DISPLAY 1 point off?
My LC-1 is running on a stock ECU car, but i AM using narrowband simulation to feed the stock ECU. Wideband signal is being used for display purposes only.
I didn't ground my **** to the ECU or the block. I have an aux fuse block that i use to power things like this, and there's a ground lug on it as well. Drawing directly to battery.
Is my wideband DISPLAY 1 point off?
#75
Well **** me... Just ordered an lc-2. Need it cause I have a brain ms3x on its way to me this week so I'm going to go insane if I can't start playing with it right away lol. I'll be running stock for a little while to learn how to tune and should have my turbo setup up and running in the spring. I have no previous wideband experience but I'll be sure to post up my impressions once I have everything running
#78
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 856
Update to LC-2.
Installed with factory ECU and G5 Gauge (analog). No MS yet.
The unit does require a free-air cal, but it is fairly straightforward. No heater cal. As I understand, the LC-1 had 2 cal operations. That is perhaps the confusion over "no cal needed".
Seems to work fine. Located at end of stock 99 down pipe. Bounces from 14.5 to 15.5 under most conditions. Goes full lean at deceleration, and goes to 13.0 above 1/2 throttle. Never goes a little lean under light load.
I understand that this is correct for stock ECU control.
Installed with factory ECU and G5 Gauge (analog). No MS yet.
The unit does require a free-air cal, but it is fairly straightforward. No heater cal. As I understand, the LC-1 had 2 cal operations. That is perhaps the confusion over "no cal needed".
Seems to work fine. Located at end of stock 99 down pipe. Bounces from 14.5 to 15.5 under most conditions. Goes full lean at deceleration, and goes to 13.0 above 1/2 throttle. Never goes a little lean under light load.
I understand that this is correct for stock ECU control.
#80
Update to LC-2.
Installed with factory ECU and G5 Gauge (analog). No MS yet.
The unit does require a free-air cal, but it is fairly straightforward. No heater cal. As I understand, the LC-1 had 2 cal operations. That is perhaps the confusion over "no cal needed".
Seems to work fine. Located at end of stock 99 down pipe. Bounces from 14.5 to 15.5 under most conditions. Goes full lean at deceleration, and goes to 13.0 above 1/2 throttle. Never goes a little lean under light load.
I understand that this is correct for stock ECU control.
Installed with factory ECU and G5 Gauge (analog). No MS yet.
The unit does require a free-air cal, but it is fairly straightforward. No heater cal. As I understand, the LC-1 had 2 cal operations. That is perhaps the confusion over "no cal needed".
Seems to work fine. Located at end of stock 99 down pipe. Bounces from 14.5 to 15.5 under most conditions. Goes full lean at deceleration, and goes to 13.0 above 1/2 throttle. Never goes a little lean under light load.
I understand that this is correct for stock ECU control.
I was actually really curious what the stock ecu fueling looked like, and was about to try this out myself.