Head Work????
#21
The 1st step or step 1 would be as far as i would go. The port matching and valve job. 15 HP sounds to be a bit inflated, but possiable. If you got time and money then Flowbench your cleaned up head first, then get headwork done or do the headwork, then flowbench again for the results. This is the only correct way to gage performance headwork improvment. CFM! Not sure about miata's but bang for the bucks in most cases for me has always been, Cams. Turbo cams would more likely be a better choice. little more duration with less overlap, you could throw in more lift also since new springs would be a good idea at the same time.
#22
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
you need to talk to john day (972-235-7405, Trey Rozelle sent you). He believes in 3-angle jobs on FI cars from personal experience. He's done a ton of machine work for FI maitas, and is ultimately respected. Gary at TDR uses him exclusively and I've never heard of anything but happy customers, and Gary has a lot of them and they all go to the track. I don't know very much about machine work, or cars in general, but I grew up around drag racing in DFW, and I've heard good things about this guy's work for a really, really long time. There's also Max at "Long Racing Engines." He's done work on my father's cars for even longer, and my dad has always been happy (20+ cars). If you talk to him, let him know that you're friend's with Lonnie and Trey Rozelle.
Please tell me you didn't go to Stoid.
Please tell me you didn't go to Stoid.
#23
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Local Machine Shop.... - Dallasimports
this also happened to another local with a miata...and its going to court.
this also happened to another local with a miata...and its going to court.
#24
I already have a quite in-depth book about engine building/headwork etc. Was just looking for B6/BP head specific tips. If I mess this one up it's no problem, if it's ok it will be tested for ***** and giggles. The head will be going onto a n/a B6 shortblock, so atm I don't see the need for the seats to be cut bigger
Pat: you got pics of the camgear markings for the exhintake swap? (sometimes I need to hand-held and spoon-fed )
Pat: you got pics of the camgear markings for the exhintake swap? (sometimes I need to hand-held and spoon-fed )
#25
Fast forward to today where X angle valve jobs (seat cuts) are common in racing. But whether it's 3 or 5 angles you cut, it still won't flow as well as a blended seat. Angled valve jobs are just cheaper and easier to do. Not better. Blending is far superior.
#28
Your definition of bowl blending and mine are different. You're saying you blended the throat into the seat. That's not my definition of bowl blending.
As I described, you literally round out the seat. I just dug through a book on head modifications and they don't even mention bowl blending. It's not well known.
As I described, you literally round out the seat. I just dug through a book on head modifications and they don't even mention bowl blending. It's not well known.
#31
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
Well, I know one thing. and everyone can do what they want. If not many people use it. It usually has a down side.
If I'm only going to gain 10hp, I'll spend my money in other ways. I was wanting 250-300hp out of the 1.6L.
I might throw in the 1.8L.
What all is envolved in swapping in the 1.8L?
If I'm only going to gain 10hp, I'll spend my money in other ways. I was wanting 250-300hp out of the 1.6L.
I might throw in the 1.8L.
What all is envolved in swapping in the 1.8L?
#32
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Incline Village, NV
Posts: 2,034
Total Cats: 5
Well, I know one thing. and everyone can do what they want. If not many people use it. It usually has a down side.
If I'm only going to gain 10hp, I'll spend my money in other ways. I was wanting 250-300hp out of the 1.6L.
I might throw in the 1.8L.
What all is envolved in swapping in the 1.8L?
If I'm only going to gain 10hp, I'll spend my money in other ways. I was wanting 250-300hp out of the 1.6L.
I might throw in the 1.8L.
What all is envolved in swapping in the 1.8L?
You will need:
-To deal with egr, either blocking it off or not. FM of course has a small plate, but it can be made yourself.
-Either a 1.6TB adaptor or you can drill and tap threads into the 1.8 intake mani like mine is
-The motor of course, make sure you get the 1.8 motor mounts.
-The wiring is the same, so all you have to do is extend the CAS wiring, (you use the 1.6 CAS)
-Injector wiring is the same as well.
Obviously the heads are different, im sure your aware of it, but you will need 1.8 exhaust mani/turbo mani
I think thats just about it
Edit:
Changing a few settings in the MS and it was done.
#33
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,029
Total Cats: 6,594
Would not rounding the seat have the effect of reducing the contact area between the seat and the valve to a nearly single point contact around its circumference, thus seriously degrading the valve's ability to reject heat into the surrounding head? This is essentially the grievance that I often hear being asserted upon complex multi-angle valve seat facing operations on forced induction engines.
#34
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
I just did this myself for the first time.
You will need:
-To deal with egr, either blocking it off or not. FM of course has a small plate, but it can be made yourself.
-Either a 1.6TB adaptor or you can drill and tap threads into the 1.8 intake mani like mine is
-The motor of course, make sure you get the 1.8 motor mounts.
-The wiring is the same, so all you have to do is extend the CAS wiring, (you use the 1.6 CAS)
-Injector wiring is the same as well.
Obviously the heads are different, im sure your aware of it, but you will need 1.8 exhaust mani/turbo mani
I think thats just about it
Edit:
Changing a few settings in the MS and it was done.
You will need:
-To deal with egr, either blocking it off or not. FM of course has a small plate, but it can be made yourself.
-Either a 1.6TB adaptor or you can drill and tap threads into the 1.8 intake mani like mine is
-The motor of course, make sure you get the 1.8 motor mounts.
-The wiring is the same, so all you have to do is extend the CAS wiring, (you use the 1.6 CAS)
-Injector wiring is the same as well.
Obviously the heads are different, im sure your aware of it, but you will need 1.8 exhaust mani/turbo mani
I think thats just about it
Edit:
Changing a few settings in the MS and it was done.
if you get a 99 motor you will also need:
electrical system plug connectors for the tps and IAC
lengthen the water temp gauge wire to the new location
notch the 1.6 alternator bracket to clear a "tab" on the head
You should look at my car next time I'm in town. There are still a few things to clean up, but the swap will be much easier the 2nd time around.
I recommend you keep the 1.6 alternator, pulleys, and oil pressure sender.
#35
Would not rounding the seat have the effect of reducing the contact area between the seat and the valve to a nearly single point contact around its circumference, thus seriously degrading the valve's ability to reject heat into the surrounding head? This is essentially the grievance that I often hear being asserted upon complex multi-angle valve seat facing operations on forced induction engines.
As for multi angle valve jobs, I've done them before, so I know what you're talking about. You have 5 cutters to cut all 5 flats or 5 angles. You skip the middle one and cut the two surfaces that go around it. This makes a sharp edge where the seat's flat should go where the valve will actually seal. You have to measure the diameter of the point and then cut one angle or the other to get the diameter correct. Of course you want it as large as possible as this gives a larger opening as well as more area for heat transfer. Anyways, you do all the intake valves and get them all the same.
Then you break out the middle carbide cutter and start cutting your flat, using cutting oil as this needs to be pretty good surface finish. It takes guidance and practice to learn to cut them right. It ain't easy at all. You make a couple turns and then you put prussian bluing on the seat and valve and then spin the valve on the seat. Then remove and check the valve to make sure you're getting a good seal in the correct spot. If not, you have to get out another cutter and move the seat. Once you know it's in the right spot, you put the cutter that will cut the seat for the valve to seal against in and keep cutting, measuring the seat width and keep checking with the bluing.
It's time consuming to get it right. Once you have those 3 angles right and the middle one is in the right spot relative to the valve's face and the seat width is correct, you cut the last two outer angles to make it a 5 angle. Then lap the valves. Then grind the valve stems to set the valve height correct as this has changed from cutting on the seat.
But all this work and time and it's still a compromise. Blending the bowls is far superior. But it's not easy. The right way to do them is to press in new oversized seats. Then,you establish where the seat must go for correct valve geometry. Then you shape the seat accordingly so that when you cut the flat, it will seamlessly transition into the rest of the seat. To do this you have to rough in the seat, then finish rounding, then when it's almost perfect, you finish cutting the seat.
So yeah it's expensive, time consuming, requires skill and experience, and isn't well known. But it works very well when done right. An old machinist/racer showed me how to cut angled valve jobs and how to bowl blend. Lets just say I don't do angled valve jobs anymore.
#36
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
I just did this myself for the first time.
You will need:
-To deal with egr, either blocking it off or not. FM of course has a small plate, but it can be made yourself.
-Either a 1.6TB adaptor or you can drill and tap threads into the 1.8 intake mani like mine is
-The motor of course, make sure you get the 1.8 motor mounts.
-The wiring is the same, so all you have to do is extend the CAS wiring, (you use the 1.6 CAS)
-Injector wiring is the same as well.
Obviously the heads are different, im sure your aware of it, but you will need 1.8 exhaust mani/turbo mani
I think thats just about it
Edit:
Changing a few settings in the MS and it was done.
You will need:
-To deal with egr, either blocking it off or not. FM of course has a small plate, but it can be made yourself.
-Either a 1.6TB adaptor or you can drill and tap threads into the 1.8 intake mani like mine is
-The motor of course, make sure you get the 1.8 motor mounts.
-The wiring is the same, so all you have to do is extend the CAS wiring, (you use the 1.6 CAS)
-Injector wiring is the same as well.
Obviously the heads are different, im sure your aware of it, but you will need 1.8 exhaust mani/turbo mani
I think thats just about it
Edit:
Changing a few settings in the MS and it was done.
Since I have MS can't I use the 1.8L throttlebody?
So basically, drill the mani, block off egr, and motor mounts, and a new manifold. That isn't bad.
Is the power differance even worth it? I don't really have to have 300.
I guess I'll drive the 1.6 till she goes to smoking, and swap the 1.8L in, and add a 6 puck sprung disk into the equation.
#37
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
keep the 1.8tps since you have ms so the intercooler pipes will fit.
if you get a 99 motor you will also need:
electrical system plug connectors for the tps and IAC
lengthen the water temp gauge wire to the new location
notch the 1.6 alternator bracket to clear a "tab" on the head
You should look at my car next time I'm in town. There are still a few things to clean up, but the swap will be much easier the 2nd time around.
I recommend you keep the 1.6 alternator, pulleys, and oil pressure sender.
if you get a 99 motor you will also need:
electrical system plug connectors for the tps and IAC
lengthen the water temp gauge wire to the new location
notch the 1.6 alternator bracket to clear a "tab" on the head
You should look at my car next time I'm in town. There are still a few things to clean up, but the swap will be much easier the 2nd time around.
I recommend you keep the 1.6 alternator, pulleys, and oil pressure sender.
It would answer alot of questions. " Like is it worth it" LOL. It doesn't sound bad though. I would probably bore it to a 1.9 as well. I bet .3L will make some differance.
Did you have to get different length rods to get 1.9 or just larger pistons.
#38
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Yea, that would be good.
It would answer alot of questions. " Like is it worth it" LOL. It doesn't sound bad though. I would probably bore it to a 1.9 as well. I bet .3L will make some differance.
Did you have to get different length rods to get 1.9 or just larger pistons.
It would answer alot of questions. " Like is it worth it" LOL. It doesn't sound bad though. I would probably bore it to a 1.9 as well. I bet .3L will make some differance.
Did you have to get different length rods to get 1.9 or just larger pistons.
Same side rods, low-comp pistons. My motor is way over the top though. If it were only a street car it wouldn't have the built motor.
#39
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South of Houston, Texas
Posts: 327
Total Cats: 0
You still cut an flat in the seat for the valve to seal against. But the rest of the seat is round.
As for multi angle valve jobs, I've done them before, so I know what you're talking about. You have 5 cutters to cut all 5 flats or 5 angles. You skip the middle one and cut the two surfaces that go around it. This makes a sharp edge where the seat's flat should go where the valve will actually seal. You have to measure the diameter of the point and then cut one angle or the other to get the diameter correct. Of course you want it as large as possible as this gives a larger opening as well as more area for heat transfer. Anyways, you do all the intake valves and get them all the same.
Then you break out the middle carbide cutter and start cutting your flat, using cutting oil as this needs to be pretty good surface finish. It takes guidance and practice to learn to cut them right. It ain't easy at all. You make a couple turns and then you put prussian bluing on the seat and valve and then spin the valve on the seat. Then remove and check the valve to make sure you're getting a good seal in the correct spot. If not, you have to get out another cutter and move the seat. Once you know it's in the right spot, you put the cutter that will cut the seat for the valve to seal against in and keep cutting, measuring the seat width and keep checking with the bluing.
It's time consuming to get it right. Once you have those 3 angles right and the middle one is in the right spot relative to the valve's face and the seat width is correct, you cut the last two outer angles to make it a 5 angle. Then lap the valves. Then grind the valve stems to set the valve height correct as this has changed from cutting on the seat.
But all this work and time and it's still a compromise. Blending the bowls is far superior. But it's not easy. The right way to do them is to press in new oversized seats. Then,you establish where the seat must go for correct valve geometry. Then you shape the seat accordingly so that when you cut the flat, it will seamlessly transition into the rest of the seat. To do this you have to rough in the seat, then finish rounding, then when it's almost perfect, you finish cutting the seat.
So yeah it's expensive, time consuming, requires skill and experience, and isn't well known. But it works very well when done right. An old machinist/racer showed me how to cut angled valve jobs and how to bowl blend. Lets just say I don't do angled valve jobs anymore.
As for multi angle valve jobs, I've done them before, so I know what you're talking about. You have 5 cutters to cut all 5 flats or 5 angles. You skip the middle one and cut the two surfaces that go around it. This makes a sharp edge where the seat's flat should go where the valve will actually seal. You have to measure the diameter of the point and then cut one angle or the other to get the diameter correct. Of course you want it as large as possible as this gives a larger opening as well as more area for heat transfer. Anyways, you do all the intake valves and get them all the same.
Then you break out the middle carbide cutter and start cutting your flat, using cutting oil as this needs to be pretty good surface finish. It takes guidance and practice to learn to cut them right. It ain't easy at all. You make a couple turns and then you put prussian bluing on the seat and valve and then spin the valve on the seat. Then remove and check the valve to make sure you're getting a good seal in the correct spot. If not, you have to get out another cutter and move the seat. Once you know it's in the right spot, you put the cutter that will cut the seat for the valve to seal against in and keep cutting, measuring the seat width and keep checking with the bluing.
It's time consuming to get it right. Once you have those 3 angles right and the middle one is in the right spot relative to the valve's face and the seat width is correct, you cut the last two outer angles to make it a 5 angle. Then lap the valves. Then grind the valve stems to set the valve height correct as this has changed from cutting on the seat.
But all this work and time and it's still a compromise. Blending the bowls is far superior. But it's not easy. The right way to do them is to press in new oversized seats. Then,you establish where the seat must go for correct valve geometry. Then you shape the seat accordingly so that when you cut the flat, it will seamlessly transition into the rest of the seat. To do this you have to rough in the seat, then finish rounding, then when it's almost perfect, you finish cutting the seat.
So yeah it's expensive, time consuming, requires skill and experience, and isn't well known. But it works very well when done right. An old machinist/racer showed me how to cut angled valve jobs and how to bowl blend. Lets just say I don't do angled valve jobs anymore.