Notices
Gaming Discuss to your nerdy heart's content

Battlefield 3 pc check in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2011 | 12:36 PM
  #241  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

I wrecked all last night. It was amazing.
Old Nov 5, 2011 | 01:25 PM
  #242  
jeff_man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

someone come coop some **** with me
Old Nov 5, 2011 | 04:01 PM
  #243  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Told myself I wouldn't game until after 7pm. Just got my computer back up after installing my new heatsink. Pics are epic, I'll upload later.
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 10:33 AM
  #244  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by messiahx
I have the same heatsink and I used to see 60C on my Core 2 Duo 2.13 @ 3.47GHz. Threw in a core 2 quad and it barely peaks at 45C. Gotta love the TDP of newer procs. So...just curious...I have a Core 2 Quad @ 2.8GHz (waiting on mah RMA'd RAM to resume OC) and I'm seeing 90-100% CPU utilization on all 4 cores in game, you guys have similar results? I had to buy a QC just to play. Couldn't get above 25fps no matter what with the dual, surprised me how limited this architecture is already.
My 2700k doesn't see more than 50% on the first 7 cores, haven't seen the 8th move past 5%.

Can't imagine your Core 2 quad would be stressing so much, are your game settings at max?
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #245  
jeff_man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

what are you using the monitor load and temps in game?
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 11:02 AM
  #246  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by jeff_man
what are you using the monitor load and temps in game?
Open Hardware Monitor.

Also meant threads, not cores above. Although 8 cores would be saweeeet

Old Nov 6, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #247  
jeff_man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

For got you are running duel screen. was looking for a over lay like fraps.
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 11:38 AM
  #248  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

It would be nice to get a good overlay. I like to turn off the second monitor while playing.
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 07:33 PM
  #249  
messiahx's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 956
Total Cats: 7
From: Shalimar, FL
Default

Originally Posted by FRT_Fun
My 2700k doesn't see more than 50% on the first 7 cores, haven't seen the 8th move past 5%.

Can't imagine your Core 2 quad would be stressing so much, are your game settings at max?
Everything is maxed except for AA. 1920x1080.

Monitoring with a combo of fraps, core temp, alt-tabbing to task manager, etc. I think it's the mass amount of texture data that is the consumer of cpu cycles. Based on what you said, 50% x 7 threads seems to correlate well to 90% x 4 threads on an older, slower proc. I feel like I may be missing out on just a little bit of what this HD 6950 can offer, hopefully I will get a little more out of it once I can get the CPU back around 3.4GHz. I think that getting another 6950 in the future would be pointless until I upgrade to a newer architecture, however.
Old Nov 7, 2011 | 07:15 PM
  #250  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

Anybody else have issues with the game not loading correctly after choosing a random multiplayer server? Nearly half the time, when I choose a server, and it takes a few seconds to set up all of the stuff, once the screen goes black, the game never loads and I have to Alt Ctrl Del and close the game and restart. Sometimes it does this twice in a row.

I just really feel this game was not completed, and they are leaving it up to the players to finish it for them by sending in error reports for them to patch. Shitty way to do business.
Old Nov 7, 2011 | 07:19 PM
  #251  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

It usually crashes on me when joining a server 1 out of 10 times. It also sometimes starts singleplayer instead of multiplayer.

Battlelog sucks. That's all there is to it.
Old Nov 7, 2011 | 07:24 PM
  #252  
jeff_man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,006
Total Cats: 103
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

my first load always crashes on both computers and will some times launch sp instead of mp when i join server.
Old Nov 7, 2011 | 07:27 PM
  #253  
Quality Control Bot's Avatar
"Quality" is my first name.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,598
Total Cats: 77
Default

Originally Posted by bobsaget
I had to buy a fresh video card and PSU to play this, Id say it was worth it.

I am one of those ******** who runs and guns when I get annoyed at the game, sneaking around back, and shooting everyone in the back of the face. It works pretty well, and also gives you a chance to get rid of those awful mortars.

ClimbasaurusRex if you want to add me. I also know how to play like a real human being :P
Typical 'Sauga attitude. lol
Old Nov 7, 2011 | 10:46 PM
  #254  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

This whole crash thing really keeps me from playing the game. I've been bored all day, and the two times I have tried to play today, I've dealt with the crash issue. One time I started it back up and played a round or two before the game crashed while mid game, the other time I just got irritated by having to open task manager again to end the game. I never restarted it and found something else to do. I hope they get off their asses and start releasing patches to fix the mountains of issues with this game. It has potential to be a pretty good game, but as of now, I'm not all that impressed. Crysis 2 is still a FAR better looking and more fun game.
Old Nov 8, 2011 | 07:14 PM
  #255  
FRT_Fun's Avatar
I'm a terrible person
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
From: Arizona
Default

Yet to have any issues.

Had a 724m aimed head shot yesterday. He was almost off my scope I had to aim so high lol.
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 01:31 AM
  #256  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

I get so irritated with headshots in this game. Never had any issue in any other PC shooter. I typically end up with the majority of my kills being headshots. But for whatever reason in this game, I can hardly get them. Whether I use a sniper rifle and a well aimed shot, or an M249 blasting away to the face at 10', I can't ******* get a head shot. A lot of times, I can unload my machine gun all over their head, even when it's the only thing showing, and even though I start firing a second or two before they ever see me, they can spin around and place 2 or 3 shots and I die, and they still have 50% health. I want to throw my mouse across the room after those kinds of deaths. Or if they are sitting perfectly still, and I'm only 50' away from them, across a street or something and I fire my sniper rifle at their head, I cannot get the ******* headshot. It's bullshit. Maybe they have lower ping than I and get the advantage of seeing things a fraction of a second sooner than I do. Even though I try to stay in servers with a ping of 100ms or less.
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 02:22 AM
  #257  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
I get so irritated with headshots in this game. Never had any issue in any other PC shooter. I typically end up with the majority of my kills being headshots. But for whatever reason in this game, I can hardly get them. Whether I use a sniper rifle and a well aimed shot, or an M249 blasting away to the face at 10', I can't ******* get a head shot. A lot of times, I can unload my machine gun all over their head, even when it's the only thing showing, and even though I start firing a second or two before they ever see me, they can spin around and place 2 or 3 shots and I die, and they still have 50% health. I want to throw my mouse across the room after those kinds of deaths. Or if they are sitting perfectly still, and I'm only 50' away from them, across a street or something and I fire my sniper rifle at their head, I cannot get the ******* headshot. It's bullshit. Maybe they have lower ping than I and get the advantage of seeing things a fraction of a second sooner than I do. Even though I try to stay in servers with a ping of 100ms or less.
TL;DR. I aim for center of mass always and end up with more headshots than not.
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 02:29 AM
  #258  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Bryce
TL;DR. I aim for center of mass always and end up with more headshots than not.
Might need to start doing that then.
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 02:44 AM
  #259  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Are you playing? What was your BL S/N again?
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 03:10 AM
  #260  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Originally Posted by jeff_man
No pics, but it happened. We should do some testing to confirm.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 AM.