Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

E85 Checklist

Old May 13, 2015 | 10:48 AM
  #101  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Actually I really want one of those flex fuel badges too, thanks for the link (
Old May 13, 2015 | 12:04 PM
  #102  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I see no flex fuel sensor in your build, they're cheap get one
Old May 13, 2015 | 12:08 PM
  #103  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Too lazy, maybe later. I think even before that I'm going to set up table switching so I can switch between 91 and e85 with a button on the dash.
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:03 PM
  #104  
Schuyler's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
From: Columbia, SC
Default

My T25 setup will likely see little power gain if I run E85, and I'd be scared for my rods anyway. So, the torque limit will keep me from going much further. Is making the chance of knock nonexsistant worth dropping ~$125 on a fuel pump and converting my car to returned/manifold referenced FPR? It's like I really want to run E85, but don't even know why. Maybe I just want to feel special?

Decisions, decisions...
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:06 PM
  #105  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

it can see a big power gain becuase you can push both boost and timing to the very limit.

put it this way: my dinky ihi, which is ACTUALLY smaller than your t25, saw 25hp WITHOUT touching timing at all.

and there's no knock.

....there are reasons not to go e85 (mainly availability) but YOUR reason is a terrible one
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:17 PM
  #106  
Schuyler's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
it can see a big power gain becuase you can push both boost and timing to the very limit.

put it this way: my dinky ihi, which is ACTUALLY smaller than your t25, saw 25hp WITHOUT touching timing at all.

and there's no knock.

....there are reasons not to go e85 (mainly availability) but YOUR reason is a terrible one
My daily commute passes multiple stations that carry it, so availability isn't really an issue. The fact that the stock rods and five speed's torque limit is reachable with pump gas and the T25 is what has me hesitant. I worded my previous post poorly. There IS power to be gained, I just would have to keep my 225ft-lb torque limit in mind and adjust boost/timing accordingly. So, the huge power gains people get with E85 aren't something I can really take advantage of. Unless i just run more timing/less boost...
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:18 PM
  #107  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Schuyler
My T25 setup will likely see little power gain if I run E85, and I'd be scared for my rods anyway. So, the torque limit will keep me from going much further. Is making the chance of knock nonexsistant worth dropping ~$125 on a fuel pump and converting my car to returned/manifold referenced FPR? It's like I really want to run E85, but don't even know why. Maybe I just want to feel special?

Decisions, decisions...
#NBProblems
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:22 PM
  #108  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

no knock.....pretty much ever unless you go nuts
faster spool.....
...it actually smells really cool, vs like death

can you tell I really like the stuff? lol
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:24 PM
  #109  
mlev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 655
Total Cats: 70
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by Schuyler
...Unless i just run more timing/less boost...
This is pretty much my plan. Adjust timing, then see where I'm at, lower boost if needed...

Maximize safe power, make that power safer, spool to full boost faster (because boost may be lower, + more exhaust flow), keep engine cooler, smells purdy... Plus I can fill my tank for $21.

I don't really see any reason not to.

Also, my wally 255 was $60 shipped, so not sure where the $1xx+ price came from.

--

pic related:

Old May 13, 2015 | 02:26 PM
  #110  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

make sure you don't get carried away with +timing and -boost cause you can spike your cyl pressures that way and still bend rods
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:33 PM
  #111  
Schuyler's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by mlev
This is pretty much my plan. Adjust timing, then see where I'm at, lower boost if needed...

Maximize safe power, make that power safer, spool to full boost faster (because boost may be lower, + more exhaust flow), keep engine cooler, smells purdy... Plus I can fill my tank for $21.

I don't really see any reason not to.

Also, my wally 255 was $60 shipped, so not sure where the $1xx+ price came from.
I was planning to go with the quieter DW200, which would be $99 plus shipping.

It's about that cheap here. $2.09 when I saw it this morning. 87 is $2.29, 93 I bought there was $2.66. So, 27% cheaper to fill up with E85, and my understanding is the fuel economy loss is 10%<X<20%. This of course being solely financial, not including all the benefits for the motor/performance.

Last edited by Schuyler; May 13, 2015 at 02:44 PM.
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:36 PM
  #112  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

You want a DW200 with install kit? I ordered one from Bryan but he sent 2, so I was going to return one, but if you want it I can just have you pay him and I'll send it to you

And after numerous experiments, so far I'm convinced that it is not any more expensive than pump whatsoever.
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:42 PM
  #113  
mlev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 655
Total Cats: 70
From: Wisconsin
Default

Yes, the fuel economy loss here is greater than 10%, but $2.66 is about 30% more than $2.09. I end up breaking about even.

And thanks for the warning. I certainly won't be going crazy with timing, but I was still running the stock timing map that came with my Rev ms3, which is hella conservative.

I plan to run "pauls map" from the much ado about timing thread, which to my understanding, people are running with success on pump gas with my motor, correct?
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:49 PM
  #114  
Schuyler's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,332
Total Cats: 87
From: Columbia, SC
Default

Originally Posted by mlev
Yes, the fuel economy loss here is greater than 10%, but $2.66 is about 30% more than $2.09. I end up breaking about even.

And thanks for the warning. I certainly won't be going crazy with timing, but I was still running the stock timing map that came with my Rev ms3, which is hella conservative.

I plan to run "pauls map" from the much ado about timing thread, which to my understanding, people are running with success on pump gas with my motor, correct?
I failed to maths. Updated my post. lol.

Originally Posted by 18psi
You want a DW200 with install kit? I ordered one from Bryan but he sent 2, so I was going to return one, but if you want it I can just have you pay him and I'll send it to you

And after numerous experiments, so far I'm convinced that it is not any more expensive than pump whatsoever.
I don't start back at my internship for at least another week, so no car parts until I have some caysh flow. Don't hold it on my behalf, but if you forget to go to the post office for the next month or so I may be interested, lol. You've had a(few) wally(s) before right? Are you pleased with how much quieter it is, for ~double the cost of what Mlev paid for his? lol
Old May 13, 2015 | 02:55 PM
  #115  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Pauls map is not agressive for e85 lol. Heck, people like Joe would even say it's weak sauce

DW200>Wally for me, because I love quiet.
Of course if you wanna go all BECAUSERACECAR, the Wally HP makes it sound like you're in some 5 second dragster with a Weldon pump lol
Old May 13, 2015 | 04:28 PM
  #116  
mlev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 655
Total Cats: 70
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Pauls map is not agressive for e85 lol.
Absolutely. But it's on average 10* more advanced that where I am now--including at WOT at full boost for me...

I'm burning it and doing some data logs today. Should be fun.
Old May 13, 2015 | 11:10 PM
  #117  
mlev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 655
Total Cats: 70
From: Wisconsin
Default

Did some data logging with my new timing to look for knock (lol), and threw one into virtual dyno.

I need to smooth out my VE map a bit, but boost holds solid at 10.5psi, and AFR stays around mid 11.

I lifted at 5800rpm because I was a *****, but assuming torque doesn't drop off too much to 6800, I'm looking at just over 250whp, 200wtq which is right what I was hoping for/expecting.

99 Stock motor
GT2554R @ 10.5psi
FIC 775cc injectors
fleabay IC
Rev built MS3 (I have such a mancrush on that guy)
and MOTHERFUCKING CORN BABY

Attached Thumbnails E85 Checklist-3rdgear_vpl2yh5nm5.jpg  
Old May 13, 2015 | 11:12 PM
  #118  
Lincoln Logs's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 530
Total Cats: 64
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by mlev

99 Stock motor
GT2554R @ 10.5psi
FIC 775cc injectors
fleabay IC
Rev built MS3 (I have such a mancrush on that guy)
and MOTHERFUCKING CORN BABY
Looks great man! How do your data logs look for temps? I've seen a fairly significant drop in overall temps with most cars running E85.
Old May 13, 2015 | 11:29 PM
  #119  
mlev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 655
Total Cats: 70
From: Wisconsin
Default

I don't have EGT, but MAT was 71F at the end of this pull (I had been out driving... aggressively... for a while), ambient was 68F. CLT was 197 at the end of the pull, with a 195 thermostat in there--but I have a coolant reroute, an aluminum, shrouded, big-***-fanned radiator, and had the heat on just a smidge.

Oh, and I have those kick-*** custom vents made by one of the members (and now vendors?) of this forum.
Old May 14, 2015 | 09:57 AM
  #120  
ofspunk7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 25
From: North St Paul, MN
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
And after numerous experiments, so far I'm convinced that it is not any more expensive than pump whatsoever.

I did the math quite a few times over the 3+ years my WRX ran E85. At the time gas was around $4, and E85 was very slightly more expensive. The amount was very, very small and over the course of a year (20,000 miles of driving). I would guess that now that E85 is under $2 it would be a wash. Either way, it is still the best money spent for butt dyno approval. It smells better and more ALLOFIT.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.