Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

GT3071R or GT3076R?

Old Aug 24, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #1  
pschmidt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 703
Total Cats: 0
From: MoCo, MD
Default GT3071R or GT3076R?

Which one, and why? I am leaning one way, but would like to hear what you all think.

HP target is 350+ while producing reasonable boost in the low 4k range. I use an AVC-R to manage an external wastegate to help with this.

This will be going on a built motor. Oversize valves, ported head, Wisecos, forged rods, etc etc. Turbo will be V-banded with the Tial .64 housing.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #2  
rharris19's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,417
Total Cats: 20
From: Seabrook, TX
Default

Do the .86 housing over the .64. I had the .64 and wished I had the .86. The 3071R is a great turbo and would fit well with your goal.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 11:58 AM
  #3  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

76 .86 gets my vote.
but I'm biased
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #4  
Preluding's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,186
Total Cats: 4
From: Fredericton, NB
Default

I'd say GT3071R, I used to have a 76 and spool took years.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #5  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Years?

what rpm did you hit peak boost in with 76 compared to the 71?
Mine spools pretty quick considering the size of the sucker.Then again I have the china 76 so the sizing is a bit different.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 12:23 PM
  #6  
pschmidt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 703
Total Cats: 0
From: MoCo, MD
Default

Are you guys sure on the .86 vs .64? My disco potato is .86, and it's a little laggy. I'm worried it'll be exacerbated with the larger turbo.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

If you think a .86 potato is laggy, a 3076R will mortify you. Get the 3071 .86 or a 2871 .86.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #8  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

am I the only guy who loves his .64 housing? my **** is win.

just last night braineack was saying how my car felt peppy -- like it just had a bigger motor.

my turbo is a 2876R .64 turbine

based on that, i'd go 3076 .64. the larger wheel should get you to 350 no problem and not have so much headroom that it leaves you wanting more down low.

or just be a super baller and get both housings and sell the one you dont want.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 04:41 PM
  #9  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

3071R, .86 housing.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #10  
dc2696's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
From: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Default

I had a built motor (1.9) with the 2871 .64, wish I had the .86, top end was choked.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 05:40 PM
  #11  
Preluding's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,186
Total Cats: 4
From: Fredericton, NB
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Years?

what rpm did you hit peak boost in with 76 compared to the 71?
Mine spools pretty quick considering the size of the sucker.Then again I have the china 76 so the sizing is a bit different.
Maybe thats stetching it a little.... hit peak boost just before 5k with restrictive exhaust... thats years for me, city driving blows that way
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 05:50 PM
  #12  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by dc2696
I had a built motor (1.9) with the 2871 .64, wish I had the .86, top end was choked.

then replace the cams and IM...problem solved.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 06:08 PM
  #13  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Preluding
Maybe thats stetching it a little.... hit peak boost just before 5k with restrictive exhaust... thats years for me, city driving blows that way
Mine gets there by 4300.

Then again I don't mind a little lag.

Gives the other cars a chance
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #14  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Wirelessly posted

Buy my begi s5 mani, gt3071, tial gate, and begi downpipe. With a 15lb spring in my tial, I hit 10 psi at 3600rpm. Dynoed 200whp at a pissant 6lbs! Of boost without tuning timing. I will sell it to you for 25pct off new prices. The differences are nominal. You can check out my setup in person if you like since I am local...
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #15  
94blackmx5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 221
Total Cats: -1
From: maine
Default

odly enough a 35r will spool faster and make more power i believe this is with the t3 turbine.


link to entire thread http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=307213
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #16  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by 94blackmx5
odly enough a 35r will spool faster and make more power i believe this is with the t3 turbine.


link to entire thread http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=307213
Yah and that is why I am going to get a gt3582. More hp everywhere. That dyno story is very persuasive.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 08:32 PM
  #17  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Name:  2871vs3076vs3582.jpg
Views: 3050
Size:  31.8 KB

Forgive me if I'm not impressed, especially for a street car.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 08:38 PM
  #18  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
am I the only guy who loves his .64 housing? my **** is win.
Plenty of love for .64 housings from the 2560R guys, plenty of love from the ~250whp guys. Not so much love from the 300whp guys.
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 08:40 PM
  #19  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Peak torque at 6500? HAHAHA
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 09:03 PM
  #20  
ctdrftna's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,146
Total Cats: 56
From: Cromwell CT
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
then replace the cams and IM...problem solved.
i 2nd this, everything works together, hence why im making 418whp on 18psi, thats with a 3071 .64.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 PM.