Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

miataturbo.net-like debauchery thread (about the ND or something)

Old Jan 31, 2016 | 06:38 PM
  #2141  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

Quick sanity check: 215/45R17s will fit with no modifications to the fenders (liners or the sheet metal), right?
Old Jan 31, 2016 | 08:10 PM
  #2142  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

If it is on the stock wheels or similar size/offset aftermarket, then absolutely.
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 11:57 AM
  #2143  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
Quick sanity check: 215/45R17s will fit with no modifications to the fenders (liners or the sheet metal), right?
Assuming offsets like the 17x7/8 6UL or Storm have then yep, you're good.
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 12:22 PM
  #2144  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

W.O.R.D.

I'm liking that RE-71Rs 215/45R17s are $25/tire cheaper than the 205s.
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 12:55 PM
  #2145  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

BRP yesterday. Rained hard, lotsa mud, not quite enough talent. Beached the ND at the exit of sweeper. Had to get yanked out of the peanut butter. Then drove it 150 miles home over the grapevine in the snow and rain. I think I finally bonded with it.






__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 01:09 PM
  #2146  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Not hitting the hard stuff is enough talent

Regarding tuning, what current scene would be kind of similar in complexity and experience needed to do anything useful?
EVO, Suburup, ...

Just trying to judge if there would be room for even one tuner on a market selling max 100 ND per year.
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 01:27 PM
  #2147  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
Not hitting the hard stuff is enough talent

Regarding tuning, what current scene would be kind of similar in complexity and experience needed to do anything useful?
EVO, Suburup, ...

Just trying to judge if there would be room for even one tuner on a market selling max 100 ND per year.
I don't have any experience doing OEM ECU reflashes on any modern cars other than the ND so I don't really know.

I have already seen ND tuners that barely know how an engine works but know the software really well. I'm on the other end as I have a good laymans grasp of the engine and what's it doing from in terms of cylinder head flow, combustion process, torque control, EGT control, det control etc. I'm still learning the ECU though.

edit: On the dyno plot I posted, the low end torque gains are modest. I didn't add any timing down low as I kept seeing tip in and a little steady state knock at low rpm. Problem is the ECU takes it times learning to add timing back in and I'm trying to reach MBT everywhere. The cam timing changes I made added cylinder pressure down low so even with stock ign timing, we saw some threshold det. It's gonna take many hours on the dyno to find all the power and have a nice smooth powerband. The one I posted is pretty lumpy in it's nascent state.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR

Last edited by emilio700; Feb 1, 2016 at 01:37 PM.
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 02:20 PM
  #2148  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

You know, when I was a kid I loved riding my bike in the rain. The deeper the puddle, the better. Here's to bonding!
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 05:49 PM
  #2149  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
self tuning is a thing of the past with modern OEM ecu's for the common n00b.

the only people that are not professionals that do it themselves are people that have been learning/adapting/tinkering most of their life and pretty much know modern ecu's or know how to figure them out.

it's good and bad. good because there's less dumb people that can screw things up. bad cause you're at "your tuners" mercy and basically helpless to adjust or update or change anything ever
Perhaps. People have been lamenting new technology bringing the end of the DIY engine tuner ever since EFI first appeared in mass market cars in the 80s, and we've gone through several different generations of control systems since then. Right now this ND engine model is new so it's not widely understood yet, but I expect in 5-10 years it'll be old hat and there'll be something new, complex, and scary in the 2024 NE.

Back in 2001 nobody understood the VVT system and the conventional wisdom was that you should swap an NB1 head onto an NB2 car if you wanted to tune it...

--Ian
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 06:25 PM
  #2150  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

^Truth.

And I'll take tuning a Megasquirt over tuning a Carter AFB any day . . . .
Old Feb 1, 2016 | 07:55 PM
  #2151  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
People have been lamenting new technology bringing the end of the DIY engine tuner ever since EFI first appeared in mass market cars in the 80s, and we've gone through several different generations of control systems since then.
I posit the following while self-consciously attempting not to be a Luddite:

There appears to have been something of a paradigm shift of late.

Once a certain level of sophistication is achieved in OEM designs, the tendency seems to be towards re-mapping of the stock ECU, rather than installing an aftermarket unit. This is reflective both upon the complexity of dealing with concepts such as direct injection, as well as an unwillingness to assume the liability associated with controlling electronic throttles and power steering, and is exacerbated as systems such as ABS / traction control / stability control are increasingly integrated into the main ECU rather than discrete and mostly independent sub-modules. At the same time, the increasing use of plug-in OBDII emissions testing applies a practical constraint to wholesale replacement of ECUs for street cars.

I have no problem with this in principle. Some vehicles, such as the Subaru, have rich and inexpensive (if not free) software packages available which enable the end-user to access important maps within the stock control system.

This has not historically been the case within the Mazda community.

Regardless of generation, we seem to be stuck with tune-by-mail companies unwilling to provide the end user with the hardware and software tools necessary to interactively tune the engine while on the dyno. And while I'll admit that the "we'll sell you our proprietary and non-remappable tune for a large sum of money" business model has apparently proven to be a lucrative one, I would think that being the only company selling the tools needed to enable the end-user to tune their own ECU would be an even more lucrative one. And yet here we we are, ten years since the release of the NC, and still nothing.

I'm not OK with that.
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 12:15 AM
  #2152  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez

I'm not OK with that.
Certainly there are challenges to overcome, but consider that in the early 90s the EFI ECU was considered to be an impenetrable black box, and rising rate fuel pressure regulators were state of the art fueling controls for an aftermarket turbo.

I agree that the lack of a good DIY tuning system for the NC is disappointing, but I think that's at least partially a problem with the market segment that bought the car. A number of vendors have noted that NC buyer demographic is quite different to the NB one from when the NB was the same age. Thinking back to the 2002-2003 timeframe, I personally knew multiple local people with turbos on their (purchased new or nearly new) NBs. I don't know anyone locally who's even purchased an NC, let alone modified it to that level.

The jury isn't in yet, but I'm hearing that the ND demographics line up more closely with NA and NB, so I'm hopeful that will encourage more DIY sorts of things.

--Ian
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 11:49 AM
  #2153  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
The jury isn't in yet, but I'm hearing that the ND demographics line up more closely with NA and NB, so I'm hopeful that will encourage more DIY sorts of things.

--Ian
That's what we were hoping for and so far, seems to be the case. Today, one can purchase the kit from EcuTek and start tuning.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 12:03 PM
  #2154  
z31maniac's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
From: OKC, OK
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
That's what we were hoping for and so far, seems to be the case. Today, one can purchase the kit from EcuTek and start tuning.
As mentioned, terrible idea for the noob or even intermediate tuner.

I know I always bring this up as a comparo, but some of the tuners are still revising tunes for the BRZ and it's been out for 3 years.
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 12:13 PM
  #2155  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by z31maniac
As mentioned, terrible idea for the noob or even intermediate tuner.

I know I always bring this up as a comparo, but some of the tuners are still revising tunes for the BRZ and it's been out for 3 years.
Oh yeah, it's not for the neophyte. Unfortunately, much of the "tuning" industry is populated by folks with passion, self belief and a set of killer tools but insufficient knowledge to do things properly. Then you have consumers tuning their first ECU. Yah, lots of boom.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 12:16 PM
  #2156  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
That's what we were hoping for and so far, seems to be the case. Today, one can purchase the kit from EcuTek and start tuning.
Having trouble finding a source from which one can actually purchase said package.

Out of curiosity, you guys are listed as an authorized tuner on the EcuTek website. Why aren't you selling the kit?
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 12:18 PM
  #2157  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Oh yeah, it's not for the neophyte.
The same argument could be made against companies like DIYAutoTune selling plug-n-play Megasquirts, or any other vendor selling any other universal ECU with a plug-n-play wiring harness, of which there are many.

Thus far, the streets aren't flowing with blood as a result of this. So why have aftermarket offerings for newer cars failed to materialize in a similar timeline to those for older vehicles? You've been able to buy a plug-n-play aftermarket ECU for the NA since before the NB was introduced.

Last edited by Joe Perez; Feb 2, 2016 at 01:48 PM.
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 01:27 PM
  #2158  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

MS is not about the hardware or even the constantly updated software, it's about the sharing of knowledge making it possible to get reasonably far towards decent tune with just one year of reading, reading, testing,, reading, asking, testing, reading , ...

If the Ecutec package actually works nicely (in the hands of morons), the only thing missing are some philanthropists sharing their high valued experiences.
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 02:21 PM
  #2159  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
MS is not about the hardware or even the constantly updated software, it's about the sharing of knowledge making it possible to get reasonably far towards decent tune with just one year of reading, reading, testing,, reading, asking, testing, reading , ...

If the Ecutec package actually works nicely (in the hands of morons), the only thing missing are some philanthropists sharing their high valued experiences.
The sharing of knowledge is a big thing. I follow the ND section m.net and a lot of the tuners there refuse to share anything. Someone asked whats the max the ND fuel pump could handle and a tuner replied saying he would not share.
Old Feb 2, 2016 | 02:30 PM
  #2160  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
The sharing of knowledge is a big thing.
It is. Doubly so when dealing with, shall we say, highly-configurable ECUs like the MS.

'Course, back in the original Link era there was no forum. We had the Power List, but it wasn't really the same thing. Good vendor support kept most of the cars from blowing up, and a lot of folks were street tuning even then.



Originally Posted by shuiend
I follow the ND section m.net and a lot of the tuners there refuse to share anything. Someone asked whats the max the ND fuel pump could handle and a tuner replied saying he would not share.
That's the kind of shitty proprietary attitude that bugs me.

ECUTek seems to have a little bit of that going on, judging by their organizational structure and business model. If they were cool, they'd sell their product direct to the customer like Innovate and AEM, rather than limiting themselves to a distribution network. That's fine if you're IBM in the 1970s.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.