Msm Nc
#23
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Dude, why do you think it sucks? They make great power. If MS3 weren't wrong wheel drive, I'd totally rock one.*
*considering buying a salvage MS3 and adding AWD from the MazdaSpeed6 or Volvo 40
*considering buying a salvage MS3 and adding AWD from the MazdaSpeed6 or Volvo 40
#24
Loki, you know me better than that... and I am out of vinegar.
Ahem...
MS3/MS6/CX7 all use the exact same MZR motor. I own an MS6. The problems associated with the motor and respective drivelines are well known. I've made several posts on this forum talking about them in depth in the past. Just go hang out on any of the specific Mazdaspeed forums and it won't take long to discover Mazda didn't do the R&D it needed to on this particular powerplant. Horrible ECU, more horrible tune, inferior internals, weak ignition system, weak fuel system, extremely sensitive sensors... the only thing guys aren't breaking are the tranny's... but since it's going to need to be long mounted in the Miata, they'll probably **** up the design of a new tranny as well. We'll see what Begi can do with it though.
Ahem...
MS3/MS6/CX7 all use the exact same MZR motor. I own an MS6. The problems associated with the motor and respective drivelines are well known. I've made several posts on this forum talking about them in depth in the past. Just go hang out on any of the specific Mazdaspeed forums and it won't take long to discover Mazda didn't do the R&D it needed to on this particular powerplant. Horrible ECU, more horrible tune, inferior internals, weak ignition system, weak fuel system, extremely sensitive sensors... the only thing guys aren't breaking are the tranny's... but since it's going to need to be long mounted in the Miata, they'll probably **** up the design of a new tranny as well. We'll see what Begi can do with it though.
#25
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
"Horrible" tune is true of any factory equipped turbo tuner car.
The only time I hear of failed engines (usually rods) is when the owner turned the boost up and detonation did its thing.
I think an AWD MazdaSpeed3 will be ****. And I'm excited to see the MazdaSpeed MX-5, knowing full well that adding an XEDE to it will probably net 30 whp.
The only time I hear of failed engines (usually rods) is when the owner turned the boost up and detonation did its thing.
I think an AWD MazdaSpeed3 will be ****. And I'm excited to see the MazdaSpeed MX-5, knowing full well that adding an XEDE to it will probably net 30 whp.
#26
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Niagara Falls, On, CANADA
Posts: 979
Total Cats: 0
**** almost 30grand...why dont you just buy a 5000$ miata, put another 5000$ into it and you will have more or the same amount of hp...not a fan of the NB or NC body styles NA FTW!!!
#27
Here's the stock dyno curve of the MS3, (blue stock, red CAI)... it'll make more power with some mods of course, but shortshifting at 5500rpm is no way to be forced to drive:
The MS6 is the same ****... you hit an absolue wall at 5500rpm, it just stops pulling. Nothing short of a piggyback fixes it, and you're still fighting factory fuel cut and a host of other CEL's that pop up due to the sensitive nature of the sensors. The AWD system is the worst part of my MS6, and there are half-a-dozen known deficiencies in the hardware, guys NO-**** having their dif mounts break in half just driving down the freeway.
Sorry, but Mazdaspeed has never impressed me. I jumped the gun on buying my MS6, but I'll never buy another MS vehicle... they've just never hit it right like the SRT or SVT guys if I can compare them against another factory tuner. Nismo and Mugen are a joke so I won't go there, but production runs of 2 years per specialty car is no way to grab a fan-base.
I'd be stoked if Mazda gets it right this time, but in the end, the NC MSM is going to be another lame, half-assed, half-finished unit like the others... and it'll be around 2 years and then be gone no matter how many they sell. Even if it's fast, they'll find some other way of completely ******* it up, like only offering it with the paddle shifters or something. I dare Mazda to prove me wrong, but y'all know I'm right.
The MS6 is the same ****... you hit an absolue wall at 5500rpm, it just stops pulling. Nothing short of a piggyback fixes it, and you're still fighting factory fuel cut and a host of other CEL's that pop up due to the sensitive nature of the sensors. The AWD system is the worst part of my MS6, and there are half-a-dozen known deficiencies in the hardware, guys NO-**** having their dif mounts break in half just driving down the freeway.
Sorry, but Mazdaspeed has never impressed me. I jumped the gun on buying my MS6, but I'll never buy another MS vehicle... they've just never hit it right like the SRT or SVT guys if I can compare them against another factory tuner. Nismo and Mugen are a joke so I won't go there, but production runs of 2 years per specialty car is no way to grab a fan-base.
I'd be stoked if Mazda gets it right this time, but in the end, the NC MSM is going to be another lame, half-assed, half-finished unit like the others... and it'll be around 2 years and then be gone no matter how many they sell. Even if it's fast, they'll find some other way of completely ******* it up, like only offering it with the paddle shifters or something. I dare Mazda to prove me wrong, but y'all know I'm right.
#28
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Loki, you know me better than that... and I am out of vinegar.
Ahem...
MS3/MS6/CX7 all use the exact same MZR motor. I own an MS6. The problems associated with the motor and respective drivelines are well known. I've made several posts on this forum talking about them in depth in the past. Just go hang out on any of the specific Mazdaspeed forums and it won't take long to discover Mazda didn't do the R&D it needed to on this particular powerplant. Horrible ECU, more horrible tune, inferior internals, weak ignition system, weak fuel system, extremely sensitive sensors... the only thing guys aren't breaking are the tranny's... but since it's going to need to be long mounted in the Miata, they'll probably **** up the design of a new tranny as well. We'll see what Begi can do with it though.
Ahem...
MS3/MS6/CX7 all use the exact same MZR motor. I own an MS6. The problems associated with the motor and respective drivelines are well known. I've made several posts on this forum talking about them in depth in the past. Just go hang out on any of the specific Mazdaspeed forums and it won't take long to discover Mazda didn't do the R&D it needed to on this particular powerplant. Horrible ECU, more horrible tune, inferior internals, weak ignition system, weak fuel system, extremely sensitive sensors... the only thing guys aren't breaking are the tranny's... but since it's going to need to be long mounted in the Miata, they'll probably **** up the design of a new tranny as well. We'll see what Begi can do with it though.
#33
don't be hatin
Nismo R34 Z-Tune
On 14 January 2005, Nismo resurrected the R34 GT-R for one last tour of duty before the introduction of the anticipated next generation GT-R. Labeled as the R34 Z-tune, the Nismo engineers made the car the most powerful road-going GT-R ever created. Using rebuilt R34s with much technology borrowed from the GT500 Racing GT-Rs and endurance racing GT-Rs, the Z-tune has a 2.8 L twin turbo instead of the stock 2.6 L engine, racing pistons, connecting rods and camshafts, and an upgraded ECU, giving the Z-tune 500 hp (370 kW) and 540 N·m (400 lb·ft) of torque. The car became affectionately known as the "Mother of all GT-Rs" and is carries a price tag of about US$ 170,000. Nismo has stated that this car will be a limited edition, and only 20 will ever be made and sold.
but yeah i'll agree mugen blows
and +1 on mazda screwing it up by adding paddle-shifters and something shitty like blingy 18's
Nismo R34 Z-Tune
On 14 January 2005, Nismo resurrected the R34 GT-R for one last tour of duty before the introduction of the anticipated next generation GT-R. Labeled as the R34 Z-tune, the Nismo engineers made the car the most powerful road-going GT-R ever created. Using rebuilt R34s with much technology borrowed from the GT500 Racing GT-Rs and endurance racing GT-Rs, the Z-tune has a 2.8 L twin turbo instead of the stock 2.6 L engine, racing pistons, connecting rods and camshafts, and an upgraded ECU, giving the Z-tune 500 hp (370 kW) and 540 N·m (400 lb·ft) of torque. The car became affectionately known as the "Mother of all GT-Rs" and is carries a price tag of about US$ 170,000. Nismo has stated that this car will be a limited edition, and only 20 will ever be made and sold.
but yeah i'll agree mugen blows
and +1 on mazda screwing it up by adding paddle-shifters and something shitty like blingy 18's
#34
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
Here's the stock dyno curve of the MS3, (blue stock, red CAI)... it'll make more power with some mods of course, but shortshifting at 5500rpm is no way to be forced to drive:
The MS6 is the same ****... you hit an absolue wall at 5500rpm, it just stops pulling. Nothing short of a piggyback fixes it, and you're still fighting factory fuel cut and a host of other CEL's that pop up due to the sensitive nature of the sensors. The AWD system is the worst part of my MS6, and there are half-a-dozen known deficiencies in the hardware, guys NO-**** having their dif mounts break in half just driving down the freeway.
Sorry, but Mazdaspeed has never impressed me. I jumped the gun on buying my MS6, but I'll never buy another MS vehicle... they've just never hit it right like the SRT or SVT guys if I can compare them against another factory tuner. Nismo and Mugen are a joke so I won't go there, but production runs of 2 years per specialty car is no way to grab a fan-base.
I'd be stoked if Mazda gets it right this time, but in the end, the NC MSM is going to be another lame, half-assed, half-finished unit like the others... and it'll be around 2 years and then be gone no matter how many they sell. Even if it's fast, they'll find some other way of completely ******* it up, like only offering it with the paddle shifters or something. I dare Mazda to prove me wrong, but y'all know I'm right.
The MS6 is the same ****... you hit an absolue wall at 5500rpm, it just stops pulling. Nothing short of a piggyback fixes it, and you're still fighting factory fuel cut and a host of other CEL's that pop up due to the sensitive nature of the sensors. The AWD system is the worst part of my MS6, and there are half-a-dozen known deficiencies in the hardware, guys NO-**** having their dif mounts break in half just driving down the freeway.
Sorry, but Mazdaspeed has never impressed me. I jumped the gun on buying my MS6, but I'll never buy another MS vehicle... they've just never hit it right like the SRT or SVT guys if I can compare them against another factory tuner. Nismo and Mugen are a joke so I won't go there, but production runs of 2 years per specialty car is no way to grab a fan-base.
I'd be stoked if Mazda gets it right this time, but in the end, the NC MSM is going to be another lame, half-assed, half-finished unit like the others... and it'll be around 2 years and then be gone no matter how many they sell. Even if it's fast, they'll find some other way of completely ******* it up, like only offering it with the paddle shifters or something. I dare Mazda to prove me wrong, but y'all know I'm right.
I too own a MS6 and have zero regrets of buying it. Mine was one of the very first produced, 2 years ownership, 14,000 miles and absolutely no problems what so ever. Running a VTA BOV (no cel), stock intake, knockoff of CP-E 3" Catback w/resonator and no muffler. My car pulls just fine to redline and I've launched the ******* holy **** out of it more than 50 times ******* with people.. Like, 5000rpm HARD launches where the car starts to get away from me in directions other than straight.
Problems/service to date:
ECU Reflash
Advance Keyless antenna failure
Tires
Oil.
I constantly hear people crying about how much they hate the car, how its such a piece of **** and I honestly couldn't be happier. Best $21,900.00 I EVER spent.
#36
I too own a MS6 and have zero regrets of buying it. Mine was one of the very first produced, 2 years ownership, 14,000 miles and absolutely no problems what so ever. Running a VTA BOV (no cel), stock intake, knockoff of CP-E 3" Catback w/resonator and no muffler. My car pulls just fine to redline and I've launched the ******* holy **** out of it more than 50 times ******* with people.. Like, 5000rpm HARD launches where the car starts to get away from me in directions other than straight.
Problems/service to date:
ECU Reflash
Advance Keyless antenna failure
Tires
Oil.
I constantly hear people crying about how much they hate the car, how its such a piece of **** and I honestly couldn't be happier. Best $21,900.00 I EVER spent.
Problems/service to date:
ECU Reflash
Advance Keyless antenna failure
Tires
Oil.
I constantly hear people crying about how much they hate the car, how its such a piece of **** and I honestly couldn't be happier. Best $21,900.00 I EVER spent.
And there's no doubt that it's fast. C&D went 0-60 in 5 seconds flat. That's fast! But also promise you it doesn't PULL to redline. The ECU dumps in a ****-ton of fuel at 5500rpm, the AF goes rich down in to the 9's and you lose 100whp in 500rpm. The graph above is very clear, and that's for an MS3. The MS6 is worse.
Of course you can rev it to redline and the car will still accelerate, but it's not "pulling" anymore. How can you still be "pulling" at 6k RPM's when the AF is at 9:1 and it's only making 120whp? The interior and fit and finish is pretty good, and they look the **** over a standard 6, but the motor and AWD system are really bad. They just are. I wish I'd bought a couple year old TL TypeS for the same price.
[img]http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/81147/2007-Acura-TL-Type-S-i003.jpg[/img
#38
Stock turbo has room to grow. Stock usually shows between 225-240whp. Guys run close to 300whp through the stocker at it's limits. Getting more means GT3071. I'll check my MS6 forum to see if somebody has some boost logs. But the boost is another issue... some guys see 20psi spikes down to 13psi for the same power as guys running 16psi flat all the way through. The stock turbo is another issue, LOTSA guys with leaking units... more than I've seen on any other factory turbo car. Why couldn't they have been a just an IQ point higher at Mazda engineering and gone with a Garrett like in the Protege.
Here's a stock MS6 graph showing HP/TQ/AF/Psi. You can see at 5500, boost is done, AF's are below 11 by 6k, and power is done... there's more power at 2k than at 6k. If they put this motor in the NC, it'll be exactly the same... and they'll probably run the low-boost tune they put in the CX-7, so it'll be rated for 240hp and put down 210whp. Of course an Xede, injectors, GT3071 DP, exhaust, intake, etc... will get you 300whp, but it'll be $5k just like it is now to get that kind of power from an NA.
I know I sound like a hater, but I bought my MS6 believing all the Zoom-Zoom hype and that this MS car was going to be different... and it's the worst one.
Here's a stock MS6 graph showing HP/TQ/AF/Psi. You can see at 5500, boost is done, AF's are below 11 by 6k, and power is done... there's more power at 2k than at 6k. If they put this motor in the NC, it'll be exactly the same... and they'll probably run the low-boost tune they put in the CX-7, so it'll be rated for 240hp and put down 210whp. Of course an Xede, injectors, GT3071 DP, exhaust, intake, etc... will get you 300whp, but it'll be $5k just like it is now to get that kind of power from an NA.
I know I sound like a hater, but I bought my MS6 believing all the Zoom-Zoom hype and that this MS car was going to be different... and it's the worst one.
Last edited by samnavy; 03-29-2008 at 11:47 AM.
#40
I think I remember reading somewhere that the MS6 had a boost-cut that would kick in pretty often if the ECU thought the fuel was < 93? I know you have access to 93 in VA, Sam, and I don't doubt you run it. But if the ECU thought... maybe that's where the power loss is coming from. Any of the MS6 guys use WI?