Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

The AI-generated cat pictures thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2019, 11:22 AM
  #39081  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Default

Wait for it:

click to play



Facebook Post


Thanks, FB.
DNMakinson is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 02:41 PM
  #39082  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

Ants: 1
Floridaman: 0



Unrelated:

Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 05:22 PM
  #39083  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,456
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

At least hes wearing his safety glasses.

Facebook Post
triple88a is online now  
Old 10-21-2019, 06:04 PM
  #39084  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,456
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Voiceover language nsfw..
Facebook Post
triple88a is online now  
Old 10-21-2019, 06:19 PM
  #39085  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,456
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Again voiceover NSFW

Facebook Post
triple88a is online now  
Old 10-21-2019, 06:31 PM
  #39086  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
(Violence against a robot)

This piece of glass vanishes as the robot nears it, then re-appears as the robot steps back, just in time to be shattered by the kinetic disincentivization wand:




Where I can buy this glass?

Last edited by Joe Perez; 10-21-2019 at 07:18 PM.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 07:07 PM
  #39087  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

I have recently become aware of a style of block heater which I'd not previously encountered:




It goes inline with the lower radiator hose. And while I'm somewhat skeptical about how much convective flow there is going to be against a closed thermostat, the reviews do seem highly positive, it's inexpensive, and the install should be extremely easy.

Any personal experiences with such a device?
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 07:55 PM
  #39088  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I have recently become aware of a style of block heater which I'd not previously encountered:

Heater Pic

It goes inline with the lower radiator hose. And while I'm somewhat skeptical about how much convective flow there is going to be against a closed thermostat, the reviews do seem highly positive, it's inexpensive, and the install should be extremely easy.

Any personal experiences with such a device?
Heater core is another path always open for natural convection.
DNMakinson is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 08:41 PM
  #39089  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
Heater core is another path always open for natural convection.
True.

My assumption here was that since the path from the mixing manifold up through the block and to the rear-head outlet into the heater core is roughly symmetrical with the path from the mixing manifold up through the heater core and into the back of the head (stock NB2 config, no reroute), that this would not be a primary convective route.

Of course, conductive heat transfer is also a thing.

Leaning in the direction of trying one of these, as it's a low-cost, low-work thing.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 09:23 PM
  #39090  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Default

click to play

DNMakinson is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 09:27 PM
  #39091  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
True.

My assumption here was that since the path from the mixing manifold up through the block and to the rear-head outlet into the heater core is roughly symmetrical with the path from the mixing manifold up through the heater core and into the back of the head (stock NB2 config, no reroute), that this would not be a primary convective route.

Of course, conductive heat transfer is also a thing.

Leaning in the direction of trying one of these, as it's a low-cost, low-work thing.
Once any imbalance occurs, the convection will work. It is hard to predict which direction the water will move, but it will move. I strongly suggest you try it.
DNMakinson is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 09:57 PM
  #39092  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,669
Total Cats: 337
Default

Originally Posted by DNMakinson
Once any imbalance occurs, the convection will work. It is hard to predict which direction the water will move, but it will move. I strongly suggest you try it.

This> Since the lower radiator hose is about the lowest point in the circuit, convection will cause heated water to rise into the block and into the radiator at the same time. The thermostat would only limit if there were to be a flow induced by another source.
olderguy is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 10:13 PM
  #39093  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

These arguments persuade me.

Going to order one.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 08:54 AM
  #39094  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 09:06 AM
  #39095  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Facebook Post
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 12:31 PM
  #39096  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
99mx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 1,647
Total Cats: 524
Default


99mx5 is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 04:50 PM
  #39097  
Senior Member
 
HarryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,015
Total Cats: 140
Default

Name:  7bGQ3Gm.jpg
Views: 8
Size:  74.1 KB
HarryB is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 07:19 PM
  #39098  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

Absolutely still in service...



Fixed.

Erat is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 07:33 PM
  #39099  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,050
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

Originally Posted by Erat
Absolutely still in service...
What I dealt with this evening was less horrible than that.

So you earn a .


In completely unrelated news:


I have long abhorred fancy bathroom sinks. Specifically, the ones which place the notion of "being elaborately exotic for the sake of impressing hypothetical guests" above that of "being useful for washing your hands."

I have discovered the singularity:




Look closely at that faucet. It's needlessly elaborate. It deposits the water into a chrome-plated canal, whereupon it cascades gently towards the user until reaching the edge, at which point it forms a little waterfall.

And you know what? It ******* works. It deposits the water at a location which is nearly central to the basin, and relatively high up. As such, it is useful for washing your entire hand, rather than just the fingertips. If anything, this faucet is better at being a bathroom sink faucet than any other I have ever encountered which was not labeled as a kitchen faucet by the manufacturer.

I ******* love this sink / faucet combination.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 07:44 PM
  #39100  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

That is a far superior sink to my current sink configuration. And both are better than abomination I posted a couple weeks ago.



What is it with me always getting weird sinks.

This one also fills up.
Erat is offline  


Quick Reply: The AI-generated cat pictures thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 PM.