Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

How (and why) to Ramble on your goat sideways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2016 | 05:31 PM
  #25121  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
EDIT: Your first draft specified gallons, not pounds of fuel.
Yes.

Then I considered both gaseous fuels and electric cells.
Old Mar 30, 2016 | 05:32 PM
  #25122  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I like the rule in that racing series that was featured on top gear.

According to those rules after a race I can walk over to any other team, hand them a 50k check and its mine.
Old Mar 30, 2016 | 05:42 PM
  #25123  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Napkin scratch cost of small nuclear reactor which would not need to refuel in that endurance series?
Old Mar 30, 2016 | 06:35 PM
  #25124  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Napkin scratch cost of small nuclear reactor which would not need to refuel in that endurance series?
No idea.

But why not? If you can engineer a compact nuclear reactor that can be manufactured for a low cost, is durable and rugged enough for a racetrack, and fits within the weight constraints of a race car, do it! Just keep the weight of the fissionable material within the 30 lb limit.
Old Mar 30, 2016 | 07:31 PM
  #25125  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Napkin scratch cost of small nuclear reactor which would not need to refuel in that endurance series?
7 figures? Maybe 8?
Old Mar 30, 2016 | 10:03 PM
  #25126  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
No idea.

But why not? If you can engineer a compact nuclear reactor that can be manufactured for a low cost, is durable and rugged enough for a racetrack, and fits within the weight constraints of a race car, do it! Just keep the weight of the fissionable material within the 30 lb limit.
I'm not sure keeping it within 30lbs is physically possible for a reactor (you can do it on a bomb because you compress it with explosives, but...). I might argue that the fuel limit should actually only reflect the amount of fissionable material that it's possible to cause to fission, rather than including the leftover stuff.

OTOH, I'm pretty sure that to fit under the 4000 lb weigh limit there's going to be so little shielding on the reactor that it'll kill every driver on the grid, the officials, corner workers, fans in the stands, and give the entire host city cancer. I doubt even Bernie would go for that.

--Ian
Old Mar 30, 2016 | 10:28 PM
  #25127  
Enginerd's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,451
Total Cats: 77
Default

I am researching whether or not to upgrade the family pusher to a Ford SUV with the 3.5L Ecoboost. Anyone familiar with these engines? Anything in particular to watch out for?
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 07:33 AM
  #25128  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

I just signed up for the DIYAutoTune AmpEFI clinic in St. Luis in April. Looking forward to it and learning how to tune MS3 a bit better.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 07:40 AM
  #25129  
bahurd's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,408
Total Cats: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Enginerd
I am researching whether or not to upgrade the family pusher to a Ford SUV with the 3.5L Ecoboost. Anyone familiar with these engines? Anything in particular to watch out for?
I worked on the original 3.5L production installation (cylinder head tooling + crankshaft tooling) and have owned a 3.5L for 150K miles now and a daughter has the 3.5 Ecoboost for 55K.

Pretty bulletproof motor overall and I've not heard of any long standing issues with the Ecoboost version.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 07:43 AM
  #25130  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
I just signed up for the DIYAutoTune AmpEFI clinic in St. Luis in April. Looking forward to it and learning how to tune MS3 a bit better.
Scott Clark did my most recent tune. Great guy and i'm very happy with how it all worked out. It turns out that in my case that my EGR was open the entire time and it may have skewed my tune but I am very happy with the results regardless. At some point I may pay for Scott to do another tune or I may go to the AMP EFI clinic myself. I can't wait to hear your review.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 07:43 AM
  #25131  
Erat's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,718
Total Cats: 830
From: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Default

Originally Posted by Enginerd
I am researching whether or not to upgrade the family pusher to a Ford SUV with the 3.5L Ecoboost. Anyone familiar with these engines? Anything in particular to watch out for?
Yes, timing chains on the early models have oiling problems of some sort.
I'm not sure they recalled it or not. Google wasn't of much help without reading a shitload of things.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q...g+chain+recall

I guess they've figured it out on the later 2015s and 2016s. Increased the size of the oil passage way from what I understand. Though, I'm not sure if this is specific to the F150s 3.5l or all of them.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 08:02 AM
  #25132  
fooger03's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,149
Total Cats: 230
From: Columbus, OH
Default

When I was looking at trucks, intercooler condensation issues and associated hydro-lock complaints ended up steering me away from the ecoboost F-150.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 08:04 AM
  #25133  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Chiburbian
Scott Clark did my most recent tune. Great guy and i'm very happy with how it all worked out. It turns out that in my case that my EGR was open the entire time and it may have skewed my tune but I am very happy with the results regardless. At some point I may pay for Scott to do another tune or I may go to the AMP EFI clinic myself. I can't wait to hear your review.
I have talked to Scott at the past 2 MS Megameets. He is an extremely smart guy and knows what he is doing. I had been planning on taking the EFI101 courses, but all the guys at DIY recommended the AMP class over it. They said it is far more hands on and you actually learn to tune, verse the EFI classes are more like bookwork and you learn the math behind everything. I will probably still take the EFI classes sometime in the future.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 08:46 AM
  #25134  
Girz0r's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,034
Total Cats: 323
From: Austin, TX
Default

Removed 2* timing up to 4k rpm and 30% load... added a bit more fuel.

Adjusted TPS map for open/closed loop loads... 0s all across the bottom helped a lot when getting off throttle for decel. Actual fuel cut instead of brupbrupbruuuhhhhh

Engine response feels... betterar? Like a happy mush of power.

When shifting it only went up to high 16s AFR

Trying to record the screen was problematic due to my usb wire being fubar... I needs a new one so it doesn't lose connection to the xede.

At one point I saw AFR dip as low as 10 something in 3-5 psi... Getting to that point snapped my neck back a bit
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 11:50 AM
  #25135  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Had no idea that the Google distributes the 32 bit version of Chrome by default. You have to tell it to download the x64 version instead.

You Should Upgrade to 64-bit Chrome. It?s More Secure, Stable, and Speedy
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 12:32 PM
  #25136  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

So, anybody here at MT think they can carry more than 1,428 bags of heroin inside their own anus?

@hustler?

http://goo.gl/54lISh

(It's not NWS, just a regular news report from pix11.com)

Last edited by Joe Perez; Mar 31, 2016 at 12:46 PM. Reason: Had to mask the URL since the forum software censors the word аnal.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 12:35 PM
  #25137  
good2go's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,815
Total Cats: 1,237
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
So, anybody here at MT think they can carry more than 1,428 bags of heroin inside their own anus?

@hustler?

http://pix11.com/2016/03/30/bronx-ma...n------cavity/
"Oops! That page can’t be found."
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 12:43 PM
  #25138  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by mgeoffriau
Had no idea that the Google distributes the 32 bit version of Chrome by default. You have to tell it to download the x64 version instead.

You Should Upgrade to 64-bit Chrome. It?s More Secure, Stable, and Speedy
Thank you.



Also, was it you who recommended the book Exploding the Phone to me? Just finished it. Damn fine read.
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 12:45 PM
  #25139  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
"Oops! That page can’t be found."
Hahaha! The forum software censored the URL itself, as it contained the word "аnal"


Try this: Bronx man caught in Vermont carrying over 1400 bags of heroin in аnal cavity | New York's PIX11 / WPIX-TV
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 01:04 PM
  #25140  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Also, was it you who recommended the book Exploding the Phone to me? Just finished it. Damn fine read.
Yup, that was me. I liked the first three quarters of the book a lot. The last part of the book seemed to drag a little bit. On the whole, though, very enjoyable.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.