The AI-generated cat pictures thread
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,057
Total Cats: 6,619
This was part of an infographic that I came across recently:
Now, unless I've totally forgotten how to math, isn't it only possible for 50% of Americans, at the most, to have "above-average" concerns about their dog's weight and physical activity?
Now, unless I've totally forgotten how to math, isn't it only possible for 50% of Americans, at the most, to have "above-average" concerns about their dog's weight and physical activity?
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,057
Total Cats: 6,619
Ie: No matter what the total level of concern is, the "average" should be the mean of all persons concerned.
It depends on how you measure concern. Is this concern that a person has for anything? In other words, I don't have concern about my blender working, I have some concern about my internet dropping out, and I have a lot of concern about my dog's weight.
If you're only talking about America's concern over their dog's weight, then yes, you are mostly correct. Then it would just depend on how they average; the whole mean, median, and mode thing. I'm pretty sure you can take a mean after taking a median and have a higher number than 50%.
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Huntington, Indiana
Posts: 2,885
Total Cats: 616
You are assuming that the level of care is equally distributed on both sides of a bell curve.
In actuality, there could be fewer people who care so little that it scews the distribution.
For instance, say we have ten people who are surveyed about their level of give a ****.
The scale is from 1-10; 1 being no ***** given, and 10 being so concerned they could literally die.
4 people score their concern at 1, 3 at 5, 1 at 7 and 2 at 9.
The average level of concern is 4.4.
In this case, 3/5ths of the population surveyed cares more than average.
In actuality, there could be fewer people who care so little that it scews the distribution.
For instance, say we have ten people who are surveyed about their level of give a ****.
The scale is from 1-10; 1 being no ***** given, and 10 being so concerned they could literally die.
4 people score their concern at 1, 3 at 5, 1 at 7 and 2 at 9.
The average level of concern is 4.4.
In this case, 3/5ths of the population surveyed cares more than average.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,057
Total Cats: 6,619
Here is a shot from Google Maps Street View a few blocks from my home which, I swear, I came across completely at random while searching for the best entrance into the emissions inspection place:
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,057
Total Cats: 6,619
A device which allows an Atari 2600 to be powered from a standard 5v USB-type supply?
That, or what FTB said, but the opposite. A summing device rather than a splitter (which, is very nearly the same thing from a schematic perspective.)
That, or what FTB said, but the opposite. A summing device rather than a splitter (which, is very nearly the same thing from a schematic perspective.)