How much noise is typical on the MAP sensor signal?
#1
How much noise is typical on the MAP sensor signal?
I am running with acceleration enrichment turned off now, because the MAP signal is just too noisy to pick out acceleration events. Or at least it was.
I added a pressure snubber that I had lying around and it smoothed out the MAPdot signal significantly, but it still seems pretty noisy.
Example with snubber:
More details at this link, including traces made under similar conditions before I added the snubber.
I have a few more things to try, but I want to get an idea of how close to "normal" the readings now are.
Thoughts?
I added a pressure snubber that I had lying around and it smoothed out the MAPdot signal significantly, but it still seems pretty noisy.
Example with snubber:
More details at this link, including traces made under similar conditions before I added the snubber.
I have a few more things to try, but I want to get an idea of how close to "normal" the readings now are.
Thoughts?
#4
I initially suspected electrical noise as well, but given the change in amplitude of the MAPdot signal after adding the (pneumatic) snubber, it looks like at least a good portion of the noise is on the "air" side.
Do you have a graph of your MAPdot signal? Your MAP does look smoother but it's on a different scale than mine so it's hard to estimate how much smoother it is.
Do you have a graph of your MAPdot signal? Your MAP does look smoother but it's on a different scale than mine so it's hard to estimate how much smoother it is.
#11
Thanks for the trace TrickerZ, though at 29 kPa / 1300 RPM mine is just as smooth. It really gets noisy up in the 70 kPa >3000 RPM range.
Regarding the MS grounds, there is only one ground plane on the MS. I added an extra 14ga wire to the manifold on mine. It didn't affect the MAP signal at all, but it did give me a more stable IAT reading. (My IAT sensor is using the same ground the AFM used.)
My MAP signal is tee'd off of the FPR line.
Regarding the MS grounds, there is only one ground plane on the MS. I added an extra 14ga wire to the manifold on mine. It didn't affect the MAP signal at all, but it did give me a more stable IAT reading. (My IAT sensor is using the same ground the AFM used.)
My MAP signal is tee'd off of the FPR line.
#13
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,303
Total Cats: 1,216
How the hell is your **** so smooth?? should I be running a chunky ground wire to the ecu's ground line? should I be using some sort of signal smoother? My map signal is decent enough to not cause choppy afr's but it doesn't look anything like your guys'.
#14
If so, there should be a separate wire from this ground plane, to the engine bay, to which all sensor grounds are returned. However, this won't work for sensors which are grounded through their body. Any sensors grounded through their body should NOT be connected to the above wire.
A second, thick wire should go from the ground plane, to the engine, to act as power ground.
Any other grounding scheme may not work.
A second, thick wire should go from the ground plane, to the engine, to act as power ground.
Any other grounding scheme may not work.
#15
I thought mine was noisy untill I saw yours.
1st pic 2.5mm vac line. Attached at the front of IM(in place of charcoal canister vent)
2nd pic same vac line with a 1mm restrictor in line.
As you can see it made bugger all difference.........OK, NO difference.
kday, what is this pressure snubber you speak of? Nevermind.....Just saw the link.
Actually, looking at them together now, the map amplitude did reduce a bit.
1st pic 2.5mm vac line. Attached at the front of IM(in place of charcoal canister vent)
2nd pic same vac line with a 1mm restrictor in line.
As you can see it made bugger all difference.........OK, NO difference.
kday, what is this pressure snubber you speak of? Nevermind.....Just saw the link.
Actually, looking at them together now, the map amplitude did reduce a bit.
Last edited by Greenie; 03-03-2009 at 08:02 AM.
#16
If so, there should be a separate wire from this ground plane, to the engine bay, to which all sensor grounds are returned. However, this won't work for sensors which are grounded through their body. Any sensors grounded through their body should NOT be connected to the above wire.
If it is electical noise, the source of the noise is RPM and MAP dependent. The signal is smooth at idle. It's smooth at 3000 RPM and low MAP. It gets noisy at high MAPs above ~3000 RPM.
#17
Early on I moved my vac line back to the FPR. I think it smoothed things out somewhat but it's hard to say since I changed so many other things.
I think 1mm might be on the large side for this. One of the things I plan to try (as soon as the snow is gone...) is a 0.6mm restrictor. That's the smallest drill bit I have, otherwise I would make it smaller.
Another thing I want to try is the "G" spec pressure snubber which has smaller holes and is intended for air.
#19
Unexpected AE caused me no end of grief when I first started tuning. I thought I had disabled AE by setting the threshold high, but the noise was enough to trigger the un-tuned AE and dump in huge amounts of fuel, but only in some parts of the map. I had a huge lean spot in the middle of my VE table thanks to autotune until I realized what was going on.