MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

NB Guys running the ms in parallel....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2008, 12:59 PM
  #21  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,049
Total Cats: 6,608
Default

I *think* that the sensor which is critical for alternator operation is one of the two temp sensors- IAT if my memory serves me right.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-02-2008, 01:04 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Marc D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 1,047
Total Cats: 1
Default

^^^

+1, thats what ive heard too.
Marc D is offline  
Old 05-02-2008, 01:23 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
mikeflys1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N/A
Posts: 359
Total Cats: 0
Default

There was no problem with the maf unhooked other than the code for "maf input low". The stock ecu still kept the idle perfect and the alternator must be still working because i've been driving the thing for a few weeks now and it fires right up every time.
mikeflys1 is offline  
Old 05-02-2008, 01:58 PM
  #24  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I *think* that the sensor which is critical for alternator operation is one of the two temp sensors- IAT if my memory serves me right.
FWIW my stock IAT is still connected but just sitting under the hood, not in the intake flow.

I just picked up a ODBII reader and the only CEL code I have if I read it correctly is a code for the MAF input low error mentioned by mikeflys. So when I go in for an inspection (several months away) I'll just plug in the MAF and clear the code. Hopefully that will do the trick.

So, to answer the OP, nope I have not had a problem with the crank position sensor error. MS-1 parallel install with a CAS.

Last edited by ZX-Tex; 05-02-2008 at 02:19 PM.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 05-02-2008, 02:11 PM
  #25  
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
ZX-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
I do know the fequency of the NB valve if you want to do some idle control, it sounds like we might need to if we want to successfully remove the MAF. I plan to leave it out with the new turbo setup so i guess i'll be using that idle mod after all

If that is indeed the cause of my idling instability I might be up for some idle control. That being said, it is not too bad right now. I have it at about 13:1 and have the timing retarded in the idle region to about 11. Set up like this, it goes up and down with the A/C from ~900 rpm (a/c disengaged) to ~1200 rpm (a/c engaged). When the a/c is engaged it will run at 14:1 no problem. It also does this thing where if I come to a complete stop after de-accelerating, like at a stop light, it will idle at 1200+ for 5-10 seconds, then drop to ~900 rpm.

When I sit at idle for a long time, like 3-4 minutes it will get unstable again with the a/c disengaged. I think it is probably due to heat soak though I am uncertain of the exact cause and effect.

It is not a big deal so I can live with it for now since it is still completely drivable. I would not want to put the MAF back in the intake flow just to improve the idle. If just plugging the MAF back in helps then I'll do it.

It will be interesting to see if your idle changes with a no MAF setup Chad. I had assumed my idle tuning problems were only due to the big injectors.
ZX-Tex is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 04:02 AM
  #26  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,979
Total Cats: 356
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
I do know the fequency of the NB valve if you want to do some idle control, it sounds like we might need to if we want to successfully remove the MAF. I plan to leave it out with the new turbo setup so i guess i'll be using that idle mod after all
I'm removing the MAF with the throttle bodies, so I'm doing the idle mod as well. As soon as the car is warmed up (ie idle in closed loop vs open loop warm-up), the idle starts to oscillate between 700-1200rpm without the MAF in there. I also get occasional oscillation when I let the MS control the ignition and the stock ECU controlling the idle valve, especially with the A/C on. As soon as I return the ignition control to the stock ECU, everything is golden. It doesn't matter if I use a flat ign map around the idle zones or I use a "valley" map, it's all the same.

Btw the idle valve frequency on my 2002 is 500Hz, what's it like on your '99?

Jim
Reverant is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
09-12-2016 08:17 PM
zephyrusaurai
Meet and Greet
2
09-28-2015 10:59 PM
Greasyman
General Miata Chat
2
09-28-2015 10:44 AM
ihiryu
General Miata Chat
9
09-28-2015 10:22 AM
Voltwings
Cars for sale/trade
0
09-27-2015 06:40 PM



Quick Reply: NB Guys running the ms in parallel....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.