Reasons to go MS3 over DIYPNP?
06-18-2011, 05:24 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,278
Total Cats: 37
Reasons to go MS3 over DIYPNP?
I like the idea of the DIYPNP. It looks to be simple, easy and quick to build, and to be reliable.
Can you tell me any good reasons (features etc) why one would want to go with an MS3 over a DIYPNP setup with the sequential injection module?
Cheers
Can you tell me any good reasons (features etc) why one would want to go with an MS3 over a DIYPNP setup with the sequential injection module?
Cheers
Reply
0
0
06-19-2011, 10:20 AM
#6
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,079
Reply
0
0
06-19-2011, 09:45 PM
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 138
Total Cats: 0
But if your fuel source varies (ie: interstate tracks with dubious E85 supply) then a flex fuel sensor and MS3 will have you covered.
Does the MS3 do sequential without the expander module? (I haven't researched this yet).
Another question, would sequential fueling/ignition be of such importance in a track only vehicle?
I thought the real benefits of it was for emissions and not power?
Reply
0
0
06-29-2011, 01:59 PM
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 303
Total Cats: 3
Because its the same question, but different circumstances, how about with:
1.6L, '92, simple turbo running on pump gas (don't have all the parts together, but simple log manifold with T-bird T3 turbo, intercooled, street and track use).
Edit: Basically, nothing wild. Shooting for 250whp at the most, more realistically 220-230.
1.6L, '92, simple turbo running on pump gas (don't have all the parts together, but simple log manifold with T-bird T3 turbo, intercooled, street and track use).
Edit: Basically, nothing wild. Shooting for 250whp at the most, more realistically 220-230.
Reply
0
0
06-30-2011, 04:55 AM
#14
Because its the same question, but different circumstances, how about with:
1.6L, '92, simple turbo running on pump gas (don't have all the parts together, but simple log manifold with T-bird T3 turbo, intercooled, street and track use).
Edit: Basically, nothing wild. Shooting for 250whp at the most, more realistically 220-230.
1.6L, '92, simple turbo running on pump gas (don't have all the parts together, but simple log manifold with T-bird T3 turbo, intercooled, street and track use).
Edit: Basically, nothing wild. Shooting for 250whp at the most, more realistically 220-230.
Reply
0
0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zaphod
MEGAsquirt
47
10-26-2018 11:00 PM
