Notices
MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

VVT NB in a 94 Chassis

Old Jan 13, 2021 | 02:16 PM
  #1  
lewisc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 0
From: Northampton, UK
Default VVT NB in a 94 Chassis

Hi all,

I have an MS3 which was originally for a NA 94 turbo engine. Now I've swapped the engine with a 2001 VVT with Fab9tuning COP conversion and a 36-2 trigger wheel. The original CAS wiring wiring was split so the new cam and crank sensors are wired up correctly. I can't get it to fire at all though and getting sync loss 2 error.

Just read https://www.miataturbo.net/megasquir...c-issue-98122/ and I might need to make some changes?

What would I need to change from stock 94 chassis tune to the new setup? I've tried so many settings now from various posts but none seem to help me.

Cranking log and tune attached.

Thanks!


Attached Files
File Type: csv
2021-01-13_18.34.25.csv (115.6 KB, 48 views)
File Type: msq
CurrentTune.msq (274.7 KB, 38 views)
Old Jan 13, 2021 | 08:09 PM
  #2  
JakZe's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 127
Total Cats: 8
From: Hawaii - Kauai
Default

Have you tried using the stock ignition pack/coils just to see if they fire?

I don't have VVT, but I was having similar issues with Fabs COPs. Tested them with MS, and they were sparking in order, but whenever I tried to crank it it would not fire during cranking. Swapped back to the stock ignition setup, and BAM it fires.

They claim its suppose to be a plug and play setup, so technically you shouldn't have to change any settings. But I also tried messing with dwell 3ms and etc to no avail.

However I returned the COPs and got FlowForce's LS coils and those started up fine.

Fab doesn't really support MS

Last edited by JakZe; Jan 13, 2021 at 08:22 PM.
Old Jan 14, 2021 | 02:50 AM
  #3  
lewisc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 0
From: Northampton, UK
Default

Ah thats not great! I think I just got rid of the Mazda coils a few weeks ago in a garage cleanup!

Has anyone been able to get the Fab9 COP kit working in MS3?

Also, this is the output of that log file attached. It seems the green and blue traces don't line up and the red trace stops after a few milliseconds (sorry, don't know which sensor is which colour).

The crank sensor is 0.010 from the trigger wheel on the feeler gauge and both the cam and crank sensors are brand new. With the original 4 tooth wheel I was getting sync loss 32 also.,

Old Jan 15, 2021 | 04:55 AM
  #4  
lewisc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 0
From: Northampton, UK
Default

I spoke to Fab9 and they advised to set to Wasted COP, nominal dwell of 3.2ms and spark duration of 1.2ms.

Do any of these settings look wrong?


Old Jan 15, 2021 | 03:25 PM
  #5  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,020
Total Cats: 369
From: Athens, Greece
Default

Are the coils wired in sequential or in pairs?
Old Jan 15, 2021 | 04:31 PM
  #6  
lewisc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 0
From: Northampton, UK
Default

Hi Reverant, fab9 say they’re wired in pairs and to use wasted COP.
Old Jan 16, 2021 | 11:08 AM
  #7  
lewisc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 0
From: Northampton, UK
Default

Had some success with rising and a cranking advance of 10 degrees with -3.8 trigger offset (the NA engine when tuned had -2.0 degrees). It briefly started and sounded like a tractor but has gone back to not starting again.

Does anyone have a MS3 VVT base map so I can try changing the spark advance map?
Old Jan 16, 2021 | 12:12 PM
  #8  
andym's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 560
Total Cats: 78
From: Miami
Default

Have you tried flipping the rising edge and going high to falling edge going low and any variable in between?
My Na vvt swap i believe uses rising edge but it might be going low. i know it ran on some other combo of those but when it did, to get the cam angle offset right required a few negative degrees but running it how I have mine setup now uses exactly 0 offset.
Old Jan 16, 2021 | 12:42 PM
  #9  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,197
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

The offset is used to synchronize your mechanical engine with the software in the ECU. All you did by going to a cranking advance of 10 instead of 12 and offset of -3.8 instead of zero was reduce cranking advance by a total of 5.8 degrees. That and the tractor sounding engine when it did fire makes me believe your timing is off. Keep in mind while you're doing all of this, if it's firing the injectors, you also most likely need new plugs.
Old Jan 17, 2021 | 06:34 AM
  #10  
lewisc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 26
Total Cats: 0
From: Northampton, UK
Default

Well after changing the plugs to new ones and setting the crank timing back to -2.0 it fired up in under a second! I guess instead of replacing more expensive sensors start with the basics!

Thanks!

Originally Posted by curly
The offset is used to synchronize your mechanical engine with the software in the ECU. All you did by going to a cranking advance of 10 instead of 12 and offset of -3.8 instead of zero was reduce cranking advance by a total of 5.8 degrees. That and the tractor sounding engine when it did fire makes me believe your timing is off. Keep in mind while you're doing all of this, if it's firing the injectors, you also most likely need new plugs.

Last edited by lewisc; Jan 17, 2021 at 08:13 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HugoW
ECUs and Tuning
26
Mar 5, 2021 04:03 PM
lewisc
MEGAsquirt
0
Jan 6, 2021 07:42 AM
Ted75zcar
MEGAsquirt
2
May 7, 2020 07:35 PM
TheV's
MEGAsquirt
10
Aug 1, 2014 09:07 AM
kewilso3
MEGAsquirt
1
Feb 11, 2011 06:08 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.