Notices
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain discuss the wondrous effects of boost and your miata...
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

First I was like this...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #21  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

esplain preas.
I had 7" 550/300 QA1 springs. I had those stupid plastic things installed. For some reason I thought the bump would travel through them, much like the FCM 1/2" spring spacer. I just wasn't thinking.

I rode like ****. So I got 400/250 7" QA1 springs in a massive trade. And put them in yesterday along with NB and ISC racing tophats.

Once removing the shocks, I found that I'm stupid and those insulators were probably why it rode like **** since I had like 1" of rear travel. I then took pictures comparing the difference in travel with and without them.

Then after installing the new 400/250 springs and setting it up for 12.5" F and and 12.75" rear, as seen in the first pic, the rears decided to settle a little and the left rear seems to be coil binding on some heavy bumps.

So I just purchased the Suspension Spring Specialists 8" 250 lb. springs to replace the 7" ones.

get it?

Braineak,
The 400/250 should be a very good setup for the street with performance in mind. As long as your shocks a valved well and you work out the travel/ bind issue, it will me a mean canyon setup. Lots of grip on crappy surfaces.
Well I liked the 550/300 setup, I just didn't like the harshness. I did drive on 550/250 after installing the rears and it was already completely better ride so those insulators were ultimately to blame.

The 400/250 drove just as good as I remember the FM springs I had prior, perfectly comfortable on the street yet very competent when I push it. Once I get the new 8" springs in the rear I think I'll finally be done touching that **** for a while.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #22  
oilstain's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 836
Total Cats: 76
From: Phoenix
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I had 7" 550/300 QA1 springs.

I rode like ****. So I got 400/250 7" QA1 springs in a massive trade. And put them in yesterday along with NB and ISC racing tophats.

I first found that I'm stupid and those insulators were probably why it rode like **** since I had like 1" of rear travel.

Then after installing them and setting it up for 12.5" F and and 12.75" rear, as seen in the first pic, the rears decided to settle a little and the left rear seems to be coil binding on some heavy bumps.

So I just purchased the Suspension Spring Specialists 8" 250 lb. springs to replace the 7" ones.

get it?



Well I liked the 550/300 setup, I just didn't like the harshness. I did drive on 550/250 after installing the rears and it was already completely better ride so those insulators were to blame. The 400/250 drove just as good as I remember the FM springs I had prior, perfectly comfortable on the street yet very competent when I push it. Once I get the new 8" springs in the rear I think I'll finally be done touching that **** for a while.
So the 7" 250 QA1s that you had didn't really hold your car up due to coilbind but only on one side, but would have worked well otherwise. I'm guessing with my RL crap I'm not going to be happy with the 7" 250 QA1s either. Ricelands are on their way, just glad I didn't order the rear springs just yet. I'll have to keep researching.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #23  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Stop ordering cheap *** springs. Ground control ftmfw!
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #24  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by oilstain
So the 7" 250 QA1s that you had didn't really hold your car up due to coilbind but only on one side, but would have worked well otherwise. I'm guessing with my RL crap I'm not going to be happy with the 7" 250 QA1s either. Ricelands are on their way, just glad I didn't order the rear springs just yet. I'll have to keep researching.

Granted they were previously used springs, but when I went out and looked again part of my wheel was resting on the curb which was raised so it was compressing the spring on that side a little more. Regardless, there's nothing wrong with QA1 springs, the problem is the length I needed in the rear; both sides will bind as is.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 12:12 PM
  #25  
gospeed81's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
From: Spring, TX
Default

I seriously had those springs on my car for two days....looks like QA1s aren't the cheap quality spring we thought they were...sucks *****.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 01:32 PM
  #26  
jacob300zx's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,211
Total Cats: 151
From: Houston, TX
Default

The drivers side rear will always be lower due to the increased weight compared to the pass side. Quit playing around with making the adjustments (threads the same) go get some scales and set your cross weight.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #27  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

springs dont tend to sag. there may be some slight inconsistency between individual springs from the same batch, but mostly they will last nearly forever and not settle over time.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 02:20 PM
  #28  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

like i said, my driver side is always .25" lower than the passenger. it was this way when I had FM springs, the 550/300s after the suspension settled and now these.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #29  
frostyllama's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 281
Total Cats: -2
From: Pollock Pines, CA
Default

could you please post pictures of comparison with nb/isc top hats?
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #30  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

no, because i took none

Driver side settled .25" lower than passenger the pictures I took above, my tire was up on the curb so it wasnt sitting level. I think one main issue is all the weight in my trunk. I have an amp, sub, jack and two stands, torque wrench, metric socket set, few other tools. I do nothing but add weight to my miata, albeit I think I've come to the determination that the 7" 250# is borderline. They compress too much under load and the coils are too close together, but I do have the collars cranked up a bit so it's making it worse.

Without taking measurements to see how much they do compress under load, I'm not sure even with NA tophats theyd be any better, you'd still need to sit low and hope the shock hits before the coils.

Then again, the GC 375/250 (6" front/7" rear) kit that most people run does not have this issue...so who knows what my deal is, gotz to be deez isc tophats.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 10:16 PM
  #31  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Here's how it looks:



Old Mar 21, 2010 | 10:24 PM
  #32  
Bond's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,219
Total Cats: 14
From: Southlake,Texas
Default

Fatten the wife up and make her ride with you.
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 10:40 PM
  #33  
chicksdigmiatas's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,498
Total Cats: 1
From: Texas, 'Murica
Default

I think when i get my ricelands, i am going to go with a 250# 8 inch, should that solve this problem?
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #34  
ArtieParty's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,118
Total Cats: 0
From: Trenton, NJ
Default

This thread reminds me that I have FCM spacers to sell.
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 08:32 AM
  #35  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
Fatten the wife up and make her ride with you.
She weights 108 lbs...It's going to take a lot of chocolate.
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 08:38 AM
  #36  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by chicksdigmiatas
I think when i get my ricelands, i am going to go with a 250# 8 inch, should that solve this problem?

I'm really not sure, it's probably safer, the CG springs are 7" 250# so I'm unsure why I'm having this issue. It could be a little bit of the weight in my trunk, the ISC tophats with too much travel. When I get back from GA I need to measure how much the springs compress and then pull the weight out of my trunk and see how it compares. I also have some preload on the springs to keep the ride height taller, so that makes the issue worse. Had the springs have no preload before the weight of the car compresses them, it'll probably be fine...This is probably also why FM doesn't reccommend different tophats even with their own springs...
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #37  
levnubhin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Swap the springs left to right so that it's even with you in the car. Lol
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 08:46 AM
  #38  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

eh, or i install my 8" springs when they come and adjust them evenly once they settle unevenly again.
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #39  
gospeed81's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by ArtieParty
This thread reminds me that I have FCM spacers to sell.
I'm interested in those
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #40  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Doing the math based on what I think the coil thicknesses are. I come up with a sprung weight of 560lbs to that corner.

That's compressing the 7" spring to 4.75"

That leaves me with 1.25" of travel left before bind (assuming 3.5" of the 7" is the coils themselves) 4.75 - 3.5 = 1.25"

The 8" springs, all things being equal, will compress to 5.75" and jack the body height up 1.25" or so. That leaves me with 2.25" of travel before bind. I'll more than likely have to lower the collars in order to decrease the body back to 12.75" so I'll decrease the amount of travel it takes until I hit the bumps.

Will that be enough? dunnozzzzzzz. Am I really gaining travel with the ISC racing tophats? Should I have ordered 9" springs?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM.