Do these cranking setting seem right?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Eastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
Do these cranking setting seem right?
I am running 550cc injectors now, the first night I put them in I started the car up before going home and it started fine and idled fine (a whole 30sec), but the next day that I tried it seemed to flood out and wouldn't re-start. I decided to send the injectors out to get flow tested since they were used and the previous owner was acting shady about them, and they are 550cc after all. Do these cranking settings make sense? I just used the difference between the 230s and the 550s and adjusted the original cranking settings ( 550/230=2.39, original setting/2.39). I figured it would be close enough to start it but its only good for one cold start. Do these numbers seem unusually low or high? Stock on the left new settings on the right. I put them back in earlier tonight but didn't have the laptop so I will try again tomorrow.
:edit: Also req fuel is correct @ 5.5 although I just remembered I never changed the Injector Characteristics settings for low impedance but can't remember if I need to with a resistor pack.. Time to read the MegaManual on that one..
:edit: Also req fuel is correct @ 5.5 although I just remembered I never changed the Injector Characteristics settings for low impedance but can't remember if I need to with a resistor pack.. Time to read the MegaManual on that one..
#3
the table on the right is low.
i have been tweaking my 550 settings since last wednesday and they run a bit higher. i don't have my laptop in front of me, but with a 1.6 i start at 1.9 for the 160 bin, 2.0 for 130, and up... i want to say i'm in the 3.6 - 3.8 range by 60 and over 4.0 at 40, and even those take a little longer than i would like before the car fires, so a couple more tenths might be in order for me.
considering you're a 1.8 as well, yours might need to even be a little higher than mine.
i have a 5.7 req_fuel, i think, according to the calculator, using a 14.7 afr, and my 1k'ish idle PW when i'm warmed up is 1.6 - 1.7
i'll post my settings when i have my laptop in front of me again, though.
i have been tweaking my 550 settings since last wednesday and they run a bit higher. i don't have my laptop in front of me, but with a 1.6 i start at 1.9 for the 160 bin, 2.0 for 130, and up... i want to say i'm in the 3.6 - 3.8 range by 60 and over 4.0 at 40, and even those take a little longer than i would like before the car fires, so a couple more tenths might be in order for me.
considering you're a 1.8 as well, yours might need to even be a little higher than mine.
i have a 5.7 req_fuel, i think, according to the calculator, using a 14.7 afr, and my 1k'ish idle PW when i'm warmed up is 1.6 - 1.7
i'll post my settings when i have my laptop in front of me again, though.
#6
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,027
Total Cats: 6,593
They actually seem a tad low to me across the board. Here are my 465 settings:
(Obviously this hasn't been tested below ~50° or so.)
Thing about low-imp injectors with resistors in series is that, theoretically, they should have somewhat higher lag times than regular hi-imp injectors. Not that Req_Fuel and the other constants matter for cranking.
(Obviously this hasn't been tested below ~50° or so.)
Thing about low-imp injectors with resistors in series is that, theoretically, they should have somewhat higher lag times than regular hi-imp injectors. Not that Req_Fuel and the other constants matter for cranking.
#11
if you can get the car running and record a warm idle PW, i posted the formula for calculating the hot and cold values in a thread awhile back.
it got me close, and just needed some tweaking from there.
https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/sho...57&postcount=7
it got me close, and just needed some tweaking from there.
https://www.miataturbo.net/forum/sho...57&postcount=7
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Eastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
Hm so the general consensus is that they are close but a bit low. Is anyone else on here running 550s on a 1.8? I wonder how much of a difference the table is for a 1.6 w/550 vs 1.8 w/550. Hopefully i'll get something figured out tonight.
#13
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
instead of original / 2.29.
you need to subtrac 1ms out of the equation, because that's opening and closing time.
so example, lets use your 160°F row:
3.1ms
550 / 230 = 2.39
3.1ms - 1ms = 2.1ms
2.1 / 2.39 = .87
.87 + 1 = 1.87
3.1ms will then = 1.87
you need to subtrac 1ms out of the equation, because that's opening and closing time.
so example, lets use your 160°F row:
3.1ms
550 / 230 = 2.39
3.1ms - 1ms = 2.1ms
2.1 / 2.39 = .87
.87 + 1 = 1.87
3.1ms will then = 1.87
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Eastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
Re calculated the cranking settings taking into account the 1ms as Braineack said and it started up alot easier, I think that did it. I screwed up and forgot to reset my req fuel to 5.5 when I put the new settings in so I spent a while trying to figure out why I had to tune my VE way down so I still have to re do that but oh well, I have to learn some how.
Thanks guys!
Thanks guys!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frank_and_Beans
Supercharger Discussion
13
09-12-2016 08:17 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM
Mikel
MEGAsquirt
4
09-28-2015 04:46 PM