Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Chiburbian's 01' Lots of potential, no follow-through build

Old Nov 18, 2016 | 11:59 AM
  #561  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Mine is the block with the oil feed port. So should be identical to 94 block.
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 12:14 PM
  #562  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Ok thanks. I'll check when I see the motor next. My main priority was getting the car moving under it's own power with the existing engine and getting all my projects closed up at home. The motor is at a friends shop waiting assembly.

Now that I have the car running and (what I feel like) is a safe startup tune I can move on to other parts of the project.
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 11:49 AM
  #563  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Speaking of other parts of the project, I am thinking about and planning my e85 upgrade. At least the under-hood portion.

My plan thus far is to simply remove the fuel line from where the fuel rail connects to the pulsation dampers etc and put in an e85 sensor there. Obviously this all depends on packaging but that is the overall plan.

To switch between push-lock and -an connections I plan on using Russell 644123 quick connect to -6an male adapters. Russell 644123: SAE Quick-Connect EFI Adapter Fitting Threaded Cap Screw-On Style | JEGS

To add my fuel pressure sensor, I plan on using 6an male to female adapter with integrated fuel pressure port. Earl's AT100199: Ano-Tuff Pressure Gauge Adapter Fitting -6AN Male to -6AN Female | JEGS

Is there any reason to upgrade to 8an or 10an for fuel lines? Seems 6an should be prefectly fine correct?

I'll try and draw out my plan later, and maybe add some pics.
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 12:26 PM
  #564  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

I feel like the only time you'll need -8 or -10 for fuel lines in a Miata is if you are Fae, or you have an LS swap.

My **** is all -6 and I've got more fuel than I'll ever know what to do with
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 01:03 PM
  #565  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Thanks. That's what I thought.

Also, I meant to ask. What can I remove (pulsation dampers etc) without causing my stock ECU to freak out when it comes emissions time?
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 01:11 PM
  #566  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

No idea, but in4answer
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 01:16 PM
  #567  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

I feel like Savington has been working on this himself. If I recall he is trying to maintain as much of the stock fuel system as possible on his "better mazdaspeed" build. For example, he is sticking with the returnless style fuel system rather than running a return line. My plan is to use a similar setup as Flyin' Miata does with it's "big fuel" system but move the e85 sensor under the hood so I have more real time measurement of what my engine is seeing.
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 01:37 PM
  #568  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Oh yeah, I've been following that closely as well. I'm in the process right now of putting stock things back on the car ...because reasons.

Point of order, Savs fuel system on the better MSM build is actually a return system with manifold reference and the longest vacuum line <clarkson> ...in the world. </clarkson> Codrus actually has essentially the same fuel system setup as well, and I'm rapidly moving in that direction. I think all of us are doing this same thing ...because reasons.
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 02:19 PM
  #569  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Hmm. That is new. I will have to read up on that. I plan on running a vacuum line to my FPR as well.

Wait, if he is running a return line why not put the regulator under the hood? That is, unless he is trying to be stealthy?
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 02:24 PM
  #570  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by Chiburbian
Wait, if he is running a return line why not put the regulator under the hood?
BECAUSE REASONS, OK?!

Originally Posted by Chiburbian
That is, unless he is trying to be stealthy?


I mean, in reality I can only guess at other peoples motivations. I know why I'M doing it, but I can't speak for others.
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 02:36 PM
  #571  
sonofthehill's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 591
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

∆∆∆∆
This
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 02:41 PM
  #572  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Did you know that the NB already has a return system from the factory?

Old Nov 23, 2016 | 02:48 PM
  #573  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
Did you know that the NB already has a return system from the factory?

Pardon?

The way I understand the term "return" system means that the fuel runs to the engine bay, from there the pressure is regulated and the excess pressure is routed back to the tank.

In a returnless system only one fuel line goes to the engine bay. There IS a return, but it's part of the tank assembly.
Old Nov 23, 2016 | 04:36 PM
  #574  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by Chiburbian
There IS a return, but it's part of the tank assembly.
Yep! A very short return system with no manifold reference, but a return system none the less.

Name:  gRk1uZm.gif
Views: 71
Size:  842.3 KB

Sorry, I spent most of my morning slopping through a muddy *** lettuce field and now I'm drinking at my desk until I'm told to go home
Old Nov 25, 2016 | 11:17 AM
  #575  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

So, planning my fuel system. I am going to start with the rear of the car and follow up on another post with the front end.** some sort of way of connecting discharge side of filter to stock fuel line. I haven't figured out exactly what parts I need yet.**

Would this work? It uses -06an but has an o-ring? Russell 644013: Specialty SAE Quick-Connect EFI Adapter Fittings 180-Degree | JEGS

Last edited by Chiburbian; Nov 25, 2016 at 11:30 AM.
Old Jan 25, 2017 | 07:58 AM
  #576  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Quick random but relavant thought...

I am running the FM1 clutch. Do I upgrade to the FM2 when the motor is out of the car or do I run the FM1 until it fails and then upgrade to something better than the FM2? My goal torque is in the low 300s. Next year when I upgrade to EFR I will certainly need more. What do you all recommend for clutch upgrade path?
Old Jan 25, 2017 | 08:27 AM
  #577  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

I would wait until the FM1 is dead before replacing. Just to save money right now.
Old Jan 25, 2017 | 01:53 PM
  #578  
z31maniac's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
From: OKC, OK
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
I would wait until the FM1 is dead before replacing. Just to save money right now.
I would do it while the engine is out.

But I HATE, I can't stress enough how much I HATE doing clutch work.
Old Feb 10, 2017 | 11:22 PM
  #579  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Not much work on my car... It's still in storage.

I am however helping a local friend install his FMII with Hydra 2.7 EMS.


Old Feb 17, 2017 | 11:10 AM
  #580  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

FMII was completed and is on the road. I need to ride in mine and his back to back but mine FEELS quite a bit faster, but then he is at 10psi on a 2560 and I am about 12-13psi on roughly a 2860...

Strange thing though, I just got my car out of storage and decided to do a little experimentation with my EBC duty so that maybe I could reduce overshoot.

I reduced my entire bias table to 34% and set my target boost to 170kpa...

I overshot like a ****.

So, I switched my entire bias table over to 0%. Overshot and hit boost limit.. I turned off the EBC entirely. Overshoot to 200kpa and hit boost limit.

I was switching settings at traffic lights on my way to work so I didn't have time to get out and look under the hood.

My suspects:
  • Cracked or leaking boost signal hoses
  • Faulty EBC
  • Faulty wiring/setup
  • Broken or otherwise defective wastegate actuator
Any other things to check?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.