Gross.
#1084
I just measured a 6UL....
164mm backspace, along with a frontspace of 114mm and total outer width of 278mm. ET25
So I am a derp.
The two wheels seem equivalent, so I am left to be suspicious of those control arms not matching OEM length. Our white car has ELBJs, but I can grab a track width to compare if desired.
164mm backspace, along with a frontspace of 114mm and total outer width of 278mm. ET25
So I am a derp.
The two wheels seem equivalent, so I am left to be suspicious of those control arms not matching OEM length. Our white car has ELBJs, but I can grab a track width to compare if desired.
#1086
And.... the wheels fit great on the blue car. Legitimate flat roll DD status. With less camber than the purple car.
Blue car track with 15x10 +25 245/40:
Front: 67"
Rear: 67.5"
Hater is 1.25" wider PER CORNER in the front. 1.125" wider PER CORNER in the rear. WHAT.
And before we blame the things i've done to the car, again consider that the initial fitting was attempted on all stock everything. Stock original arms, hubs, brakes, bushings, balljoints, everything. If it had looked anything at ALL like the blue car currently looks, i wouldn't have even considered sending PTS an email asking "uhhhhhhhh WUT?" I wouldn't have made a single big deal out of it. I would have just done a flat roll and gone on with my day. I spent hours trying to get them to fit on all stock everything. Hours.
I'm completely lost. I give up.
#1092
20170817_203543 by concealer404, on Flickr
20170817_203520 by concealer404, on Flickr
Rear quarter directly above, no body modifications.
20170817_203557 by concealer404, on Flickr
2017-08-18_09-08-48 by concealer404, on Flickr
#1098
I don't think if i messed up the UCAs by an inch on every corner, that i would have been able to get an alignment on this thing. Also again: This was batshit on stock arms, stock brakes, stock balljoints, stock everything.