Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2019, 07:15 PM
  #13721  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
I'm guessing that came out a bit shittier than you intended, right?
Nope. Why should we have to lower our standards of living even further and spend a huge chunk of our tax dollars on non-citizens, when we already have our own poor/hard-up/unable/criminals?

What's the net benefit of open boarders and free access to entitlements provided by our working class? Feel better about yourself while smashing the patriarchy?

Do away with entitlements, and convert federal taxes to sales taxes and let the caravans in, if they even show up...
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-19-2019, 07:26 PM
  #13722  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,029
Total Cats: 6,594
Default

Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-19-2019, 08:25 PM
  #13723  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default












Braineack is offline  
Old 02-19-2019, 08:26 PM
  #13724  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Braineack is offline  
Old 02-19-2019, 08:31 PM
  #13725  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
Nope. Why should we have to lower our standards of living even further and spend a huge chunk of our tax dollars on non-citizens, when we already have our own poor/hard-up/unable/criminals?

What's the net benefit of open boarders and free access to entitlements provided by our working class? Feel better about yourself while smashing the patriarchy?

Do away with entitlements, and convert federal taxes to sales taxes and let the caravans in, if they even show up...
Pretty much all your posts read that you believe that every immigrant is illegal and non become citizens and that you're in favor of NO immigration whatsoever. It's a weird vibe.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 02-19-2019, 08:44 PM
  #13726  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,029
Total Cats: 6,594
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I think this person is ugly:


To be completely objective and fair, that one's a 10/10. Without knowing the first thing about their intelligence or sociopolitical views, I would totally nail them to the wall.

(See what I did there? Gender-neutral pronouns. I'm politically acceptable!)
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 08:24 AM
  #13727  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,029
Total Cats: 6,594
Default

Who'd have thought that actions had consequences?

Kentucky teen in viral protest video files lawsuit against the Washington Post

I do feel that $250 million in unreasonably optimistic (although my own employer is presently suing Sinclair Broadcasting for $1 billion for basically being ********), but even if the case winds up being dismissed, this is still going to be troublesome for The Post. Which is unfortunate, as they're one of the few journalistic entities which, as someone who works in TV news, I still respect.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:00 AM
  #13728  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default




Last edited by Braineack; 02-20-2019 at 12:13 PM.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:05 AM
  #13729  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Pretty much all your posts read that you believe that every immigrant is illegal and non become citizens and that you're in favor of NO immigration whatsoever. It's a weird vibe.
I'm pro-immigration.

We let in a "sustainable" ~1,000,000 immigrants into the country each year; an estimated 37,00,000 worth living here today -- im cool with this. Meanwhile, it's also estimated that ~12,000,000 illegal immigrants live here as well, and average somewhat close to the number of legal entries a year -- I'm not cool with that.

Last two posts I made about the subject specifically said "non-citizens" and "Mexicans". I.e., not U.S. citizens -- that also excludes visa holders. Visa holders aren't breaking the law and taking advantage of your generosity with my money. I even said, let the caravans in -- but with a few caveats. Why does that suggest to you I'm anti-immigration? do you have trouble separating legal-immigration with illegal-immigration?

It's probably a weird vibe to actually read things on the internet that aren't repeated from the NPC echo chamber. So I completely understand.

But what's the end-goal here to allow illegals into the country and make it easy for them to live here without contributions? Why is this better than denying entry, for Americans specifically? Why are you pro-crime? What crimes do you think we should also encourage/ignore? Why are you pro-spending other people's money? Do you pay extra in taxes? Do you volunteer for charity?

You said it yourself that we have our own issues to deal with here in the US (child molestation), so why is it better to add another ~850,000 or so non-vested people into our country a year, illegally, who don't pay taxes, some of whom don't follow the rest of our laws or are not here for good reasons, who are a burden to our society/resources? Since no law-maker is going to come down hard on illegals (since people like you get a weird vibe from it), and we aren't going to get rid of entitlements anytime soon, or sanctuary cities, the wall is an effective means to reduce illegal entry and extra crime/burden into this country.





Last edited by Braineack; 02-20-2019 at 12:31 PM.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:08 AM
  #13730  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,656
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

It's a shame the Washington Post hires writers that choose to report things "other than factually." It would be very refreshing to have a newspaper anywhere that would simply report what has occurred without adding or omitting things.

Too many people become newspaper reporters to change the world instead of write down what happened. Their job is to ascertain what happened and write it down. If there are conflicting reports as to what happened they should note that in their story.

All of that being said, this is the biggest made-up non-story of the year so far. Nothing that occurred there has any actual consequence on any group of people other than those who attended. It should have been noted as being a publicity stunt and not bothered to be reported by any reasonable journalist.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:18 AM
  #13731  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,453
Total Cats: 479
Default

Facebook Post
cordycord is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:22 AM
  #13732  
Junior Member
 
BGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 196
Total Cats: 24
Default

On the way to work yesterday morning I listened to the morning talk DJ's discussing that there has supposedly been a spike of garbage conspiracy theories that have gained media traction in the past 10 years and it appears to have been brought on by expanding YouTube video content that passes off somebody's ideas as "facts" and is typically combined with heavily edited or totally bogus pictures or videos to back up the bogus claims.
Yesterday evening I visited YouTube and watched a couple of video's that claim the same thing so it must be true.

(See the irony in how I fact checked what I heard on the radio?)

Now how do I go about fact checking YouTube video's?
BGordon is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:30 AM
  #13733  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,667
Total Cats: 337
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
To be completely objective and fair, that one's a 10/10. Without knowing the first thing about their intelligence or sociopolitical views, I would totally nail them to the wall.

(See what I did there? Gender-neutral pronouns. I'm politically acceptable!)
Maybe the gender neutral pronouns are appropriate. Looks like a dude to me
olderguy is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:42 AM
  #13734  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
It's a shame the Washington Post hires writers that choose to report things "other than factually." It would be very refreshing to have a newspaper anywhere that would simply report what has occurred without adding or omitting things.

topical:

We all know what news is. But do you know what’s never news? When someone in the news, tells you the truth about the news.

Lara Logan, who was a foreign correspondent for CBS News until leaving last year, was interviewed for a podcast by author and former Navy SEAL Mike Ritland.

"And the media everywhere is mostly liberal,” Logan said. “But in this country, 85 percent of journalists are registered Democrats. So that’s just a fact, right?”

“There’s one Fox,” Logan added. “And there’s many, many, many more organizations on the left. But the problem is that the weight of all of these organizations on one side of the political spectrum. When you turn your computer or you walk past the TV… if they are all saying the same thing, the weight of that convinces you that it’s true. You don’t question it because everyone is saying it.”

“I didn’t even notice that there was a bias in the media,” Logan said. “You read one story after another or hear it and it’s all based on one anonymous administration official, former administration official, right? I mean, that not, that’s not journalism. That’s horse----."

I could listen to that for hours. For us, this is an obvious truth. Yet the voice of the hive is so pervasive, it goes unheard, except we just heard her loud and clear. You already know what the media's thinking: FNC is going to eat this up. You’re right! So what?

Because whenever the emperor’s new clothes are exposed, don't expect the emperor to tell you about it. The conformist media will sweep this under a rug, so it’s up to us to burn that rug, even if it’s on top of Chuck Todd's head.

For decades the mainstream media defended its bias, saying they aren't liberally biased, just truth biased – and of course, the truth is always liberal. Which is funny, because we've lost count how many times the media's been dead wrong on so many things. From defending terrible institutions to reanimating bad ideas – the only reason they never get called out, is because they run the "calling out" business. And so the ideas they love – born from teachers’ lounges and safe spaces – continue to harm us, and there’s no speedbump in sight.

So forgive us if we find Logan refreshing. She told you what you know already: the media are about conflict – so there can only be two sides: the consensus among them, and the marginalized you. And all those ad dollars, which back the consensus, that keep rolling in. The profit model for the news division, isn't news – its division.

Which is why in news there is no nuance. When it's embarrassing, there's not even news!

It’s either their side, or the downside.


meanwhile:

Braineack is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 11:45 AM
  #13735  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Huge win for Americans:

BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST EXCESSIVE CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURES
by Kevin Ryan

The Supreme Court this morning has ruled in favor of a man whose $42,000 Land Rover SUV was seized as part of a civil asset forfeiture. The justices ruled that the Eighth Amendment’s clause against excessive fines does apply to state and local governments.

https://video-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/...e0&oe=5C6DA519



too bad they didn't rule the practice itself should be unconstitutional, still a completely immeasurable limit...
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 12:16 PM
  #13736  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by BGordon
On the way to work yesterday morning I listened to the morning talk DJ's discussing that there has supposedly been a spike of garbage conspiracy theories that have gained media traction in the past 10 years and it appears to have been brought on by expanding YouTube video content that passes off somebody's ideas as "facts" and is typically combined with heavily edited or totally bogus pictures or videos to back up the bogus claims.
Yesterday evening I visited YouTube and watched a couple of video's that claim the same thing so it must be true.

(See the irony in how I fact checked what I heard on the radio?)

Now how do I go about fact checking YouTube video's?

fakehatecrimes.org
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 12:19 PM
  #13737  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

for joe:

https://medium.com/@ltthompso/the-co...p-d33296ec251e

The Congresswoman Loves the Swamp

Her Wealthy Chief of Staff used a PAC to Pay Her Boyfriend

Last Friday, my mentions died for your sins. I posted a screen grab of Riley Roberts’s House Microsoft Outlook card, including his official house.gov email address, office phone number, and his designation as “Staff”. Roberts is the boyfriend of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The Congresswoman was upset.

Throwing caution to the wind, she stormed into my mentions, asserting this was just a way to give Mr. Roberts access to her official calendar.

Her Chief of Staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, soon followed, reiterating the calendar claim and accusing me of doxxing Mr. Roberts by posting his publicly available LinkedIn profile (which he deleted) and his official government address and the office phone number.

Neither AOC nor Chakrabarti said why Roberts needs access to her official calendar.

Regardless, hordes of her howling minions followed. I was briefly suspended by Twitter for revealing personal information, only to be released with an apology when I pointed out that everything I posted is government property and public.



My Parole Papers

My brief stint as a digital political prisoner turned into something of a cause célèbre on the right, inviting wave upon wave of MAGA-enthusiasts to battle back on my behalf against the forces of digital socialism. My timeline is still a wasteland.

...



...

Per the House Admin office, a family member can, in special circumstances, get a house.gov email address. But Roberts is not a family member, and although AOC referred to him as her partner in November of last year, she omitted him from her mandatory candidate financial disclosures for 2017 and 2018. Perhaps they’ve gotten married since. If so — if he is her spouse now — we should see his finances disclosed along with hers in her 2019 disclosure form due in May. But to be clear, AOC did not disclose Roberts’s finances as a spouse during her campaign.

Regardless, absent a wavier from House Ethics, family members have to be volunteers. AOC’s office apparently doesn’t believe in having unpaid workers, as according to Chakrabarti they have no volunteers in the office.

So Roberts is designated as staff but also isn’t on AOC’s staff, even though he showed up Friday morning in the House directory as processing into her personal office as a staffer. In other words his staff status, like his spouse status, is akin to Schrodinger’s cat.


...

Finally, all of the above is based on public information. It took me a couple of hours to pull it all together and write it up. I suppose this could be called muckraking, but it’s really just minimal reporting that nobody in the press decided to do. I can’t emphasize enough how easy it was to find all of this information. It’s literally just sitting there. But no reporter bothered to read it. Democracy dies in darkness? Nah. Reporters are just lazy
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 12:36 PM
  #13738  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Facebook Post

Facebook Post
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 12:52 PM
  #13739  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,453
Total Cats: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Who'd have thought that actions had consequences?

Kentucky teen in viral protest video files lawsuit against the Washington Post

I do feel that $250 million in unreasonably optimistic (although my own employer is presently suing Sinclair Broadcasting for $1 billion for basically being ********), but even if the case winds up being dismissed, this is still going to be troublesome for The Post. Which is unfortunate, as they're one of the few journalistic entities which, as someone who works in TV news, I still respect.
When sending a message to the world's richest man, sometimes a large sum is required.
cordycord is offline  
Old 02-20-2019, 01:18 PM
  #13740  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,498
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

how much did some ******* get for spilling coffee on his tiny *****?

they chose $250mm for a specific reason.


Simply have serious penalties for any person or company doing XYZ.
By serious I mean quadruple fines, lose any business license they might have, and lots of other socially acceptable punishments.
If it is a legally operating business any officers and employees directly involved in XYZ should also be required to pay hefty fines personally on top of business fines.
Braineack is offline  


Quick Reply: The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.