The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
"Democrats don't take a dump, son, without a plan".
Virginia, as a state, has been turning gradually more blue since 2000'ish. Until this latest series of events, the state was poised to turn completely blue at the next election cycle... State Executive and Assembly, US Congress, and Electoral College... solid BLUE! The only thing keeping VA from looking exactly like California when it comes to "progressive bullshit" is ONE single vote in the state house and senate.
Now, the DNC has to be shitting itself. If it comes down to special elections, it'll be a bloodbath because there isn't an establishment Democrat left in the ladder that they can pull from. The Democrats will have to run a complete nobody in each job, and how will they pcik a winner? It's be Thunderdome... accusating eachother of racism, rape, cultural appropriation, anti-Gay, pro-Israel, immigrant hating, etc... potentials will destroy each-other on a world stage with the unexpected opportunity to move up the rungs.
Republicans just need to point the minority speaker of each house and settle it over beers for who gets Governor or Lt Governor.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
the lt gov. isn't going anywhere.
worst part, over the weekend, i was kicking it with the people, and even people living in a shed in Cocodrie, LA were like, oh youre from VA, having all sorts of problems in that state... it's like go **** yourself LA; we aiiight.
worst part, over the weekend, i was kicking it with the people, and even people living in a shed in Cocodrie, LA were like, oh youre from VA, having all sorts of problems in that state... it's like go **** yourself LA; we aiiight.
Last edited by Braineack; 02-12-2019 at 05:34 PM.
Joe, you complete me.
On the other side of the country... Newsom discovers a pair of ********* between his legs. I blame the ******* voters there for this nightmare. Every single expert that ever said anything about the train project said NO ******* WAY IN A MILLION YEARS will this ever work. Jerry Brown snapped his fingers and the voters checked the box. The conspiracy theory is that they were hoping after 8 years of Obama, that Hill-dog would reign for another 8 and that federal funding would magically appear... oops. California is lucky to still be solvent, at least Newsom grabbed this low-hanging fruit. This might also be a big **** YOU to the AOC crowd who just championed hi-speed rail specifically in their glorious new green deal.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cal...llooning-costs
Chuck called it 2 years ago:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/...ble-money-pit/
On the other side of the country... Newsom discovers a pair of ********* between his legs. I blame the ******* voters there for this nightmare. Every single expert that ever said anything about the train project said NO ******* WAY IN A MILLION YEARS will this ever work. Jerry Brown snapped his fingers and the voters checked the box. The conspiracy theory is that they were hoping after 8 years of Obama, that Hill-dog would reign for another 8 and that federal funding would magically appear... oops. California is lucky to still be solvent, at least Newsom grabbed this low-hanging fruit. This might also be a big **** YOU to the AOC crowd who just championed hi-speed rail specifically in their glorious new green deal.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cal...llooning-costs
Chuck called it 2 years ago:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/...ble-money-pit/
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
That's probably why it's so difficult for you to comprehend the present political climate in the US.
The President is not anti-press. Much to the contrary, he recognizes the press as a valuable ally when they are extolling his virtues.
No, the President, much like his allies at his extreme end of the political spectrum, and his opponents at the other, are anti-objectivity. When certain members of the press use logic and reason to objectively analyze his administration, they are Agents of Evil. But when they either:
they they are obviously righteous and good.
(For the purposes of this analysis, "The President" can refer to any elected politician who tends to prefer rhetoric and hyperbole over facts and truth, and "he / his" can be substituted for pronouns which are acceptable to persons / non-persons / demi-persons who identify as any of the 437 recognized genders, or as no gender at all, or as some indefinite position across a spectrum of infinite genders or lack thereof.)
The President is not anti-press. Much to the contrary, he recognizes the press as a valuable ally when they are extolling his virtues.
No, the President, much like his allies at his extreme end of the political spectrum, and his opponents at the other, are anti-objectivity. When certain members of the press use logic and reason to objectively analyze his administration, they are Agents of Evil. But when they either:
A: Use logic and reason to discover facts which, while unrelated to his own legitimacy, question the legitimacy of those whom he opposes, or
B: Serve as a mouthpiece for him,
they they are obviously righteous and good.
(For the purposes of this analysis, "The President" can refer to any elected politician who tends to prefer rhetoric and hyperbole over facts and truth, and "he / his" can be substituted for pronouns which are acceptable to persons / non-persons / demi-persons who identify as any of the 437 recognized genders, or as no gender at all, or as some indefinite position across a spectrum of infinite genders or lack thereof.)
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
I'm afraid that I can't quite follow the logic on this one.
Could you explain it to me in simple terms? (Assume that I have no knowledge of facts or opinions relevant to this situation which you presuppose to be universally understood.)
Could you explain it to me in simple terms? (Assume that I have no knowledge of facts or opinions relevant to this situation which you presuppose to be universally understood.)
That's probably why it's so difficult for you to comprehend the present political climate in the US.
The President is not anti-press. Much to the contrary, he recognizes the press as a valuable ally when they are extolling his vires.
No, the President, much like his allies at his extreme end of the political spectrum, and his opponents at the other, are anti-objectivity. When certain members of the press use logic and reason to objectively analyze his administration, they are Agents of Evil. But when they either:
A: Use logic and reason to discover facts which, while unrelated to his own legitimacy, question the legitimacy of those whom he opposes, or
B: Serve as a mouthpiece for him,they they are obviously righteous and good.
(For the purposes of this analysis, "The President" can refer to any elected politician who tends to prefer rhetoric and hyperbole over facts and truth, and "he / his" can be substituted for pronouns which are acceptable to persons / non-persons / demi-persons who identify as any of the 437 recognized genders, or as no gender at all, or as some indefinite position across a spectrum of infinite genders or lack thereof.)
The President is not anti-press. Much to the contrary, he recognizes the press as a valuable ally when they are extolling his vires.
No, the President, much like his allies at his extreme end of the political spectrum, and his opponents at the other, are anti-objectivity. When certain members of the press use logic and reason to objectively analyze his administration, they are Agents of Evil. But when they either:
A: Use logic and reason to discover facts which, while unrelated to his own legitimacy, question the legitimacy of those whom he opposes, or
B: Serve as a mouthpiece for him,they they are obviously righteous and good.
(For the purposes of this analysis, "The President" can refer to any elected politician who tends to prefer rhetoric and hyperbole over facts and truth, and "he / his" can be substituted for pronouns which are acceptable to persons / non-persons / demi-persons who identify as any of the 437 recognized genders, or as no gender at all, or as some indefinite position across a spectrum of infinite genders or lack thereof.)
Now ask the average person about where Trump stands on stuff... and you will get either get one of 3 answers:
A) Dude is the best thing to ever happen to 'Merica.
B) He's literally a ****.
C) I did the right thing and deleted my Facebook account and I have no clue what's going on in the world.
And so we read hundreds of daily articles that are almost always opinion pieces that start out "Trump MIGHT..." or "Trump COULD..." that are razor thin with no substance and highly improbable, but are carefully worded and presented like hard-facts. These stories are always personal attacks, and always lead to the most horrible consequences imaginable if the most unlikely thing they're talking about happens. I'm 100% onboard with calling this stuff "Fake News". Or jump straight to the blatant Fake News, the most recent examples of which are the Covington Catholic kids who were initially assassinated by the media, then the story was sorta walked back but not really, then it was still about how Trump "caused" it to happen, or "set the stage" or "made it acceptable" or whatever bullshit that he had nothing to do with... the media doubled-down on crazy tangents because the public expects it. FAKE NEWS IS GOOD FOR BUSINESS!
Remember when George Zimmerman was labeled a "white hispanic" because the liberal media had nothing they could sell about the event to play the race card and just made it up? Almost everything I read that is negative about President Trump has that same bullshit feel to it.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,039
Total Cats: 6,604
AOC is learning how the free-market works: https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...s-not-pleased/
In her own words: "Shock doesn’t begin to cover it."
In her own words: "Shock doesn’t begin to cover it."
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
AOC is learning how the free-market works: https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...s-not-pleased/
In her own words: "Shock doesn’t begin to cover it."
In her own words: "Shock doesn’t begin to cover it."