Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Current Events, News, Politics (https://www.miataturbo.net/current-events-news-politics-77/)
-   -   The hero warrior cop is ready to get roided up, rape, and drink and drive (https://www.miataturbo.net/current-events-news-politics-77/hero-warrior-cop-ready-get-roided-up-rape-drink-drive-73864/)

Braineack 11-21-2014 07:08 AM

watch a person get beat for 29 minutes by DOC:


not surprising: it ends with him going to the hospital.

Braineack 11-21-2014 07:10 AM

police logic: break into people's car to prevent others from potentially breaking into cars

Police Department in Texas is Breaking Into Cars…….To Stop People From Breaking Into Cars | The Free Thought Project


Houston, TX — Police in Rosenberg are taking a proactive approach to prevent vehicle break-ins by breaking into cars. Yes, you read that correctly.

According to Rosenberg police, it’s the season for theft and stealing. “Burglars are always watching, waiting for that chance to make the right move,” Officer Tim Kraus tells KHOU.

“They want easy targets,” says Asst. Chief Tracie Dunn.

So the solution that Rosenberg police have come up with to deal with this theft is to patrol shopping center parking lots and attempt to get inside privately owned vehicles.

“You can see all this stuff back there, it’s easy for someone to smash the window and grab it. Right here, I can get my hand in and open the door. We want to stop stuff like this,” as he reaches into a locked car and opens the door, setting off the alarm.

After the officers attempt to break into these vehicles, they are leaving little green report cards on how the car could have been more secure.

Braineack 11-21-2014 07:12 AM

inspector generals hate cameras and love driving in the UK


Joe Perez 11-21-2014 07:46 AM

Cops hate when you walk down the stairs in the public housing project building where you live:

http://pix11.com/2014/11/21/police-i...g-in-brooklyn/

Braineack 11-21-2014 07:55 AM

they also hate when you're trying to get some social aid:

Sheriff suspends warrant checks at Social Services | Woodstock Times


The policy, which began last month, called for all visitors to the DSS facility on Ulster Avenue to present identification to the deputies who run the metal detectors and perform bag checks at the entrance. IDs were checked against a statewide database of active warrants. Those found to be wanted by the law were detained and, if the arresting agency asked, taken into custody. During the 20 business days that the policy was in effect, 30 people were arrested after their name popped up on the warrant list. The majority of the arrests were for low-level misdemeanors and probation violation warrants. The program netted its first felony-level arrest last week when a Kingston man wanted for allegedly selling crack cocaine to an undercover cop was caught when he showed up at the DSS building.

Joe Perez 11-21-2014 04:05 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1184381)
they also hate when you're trying to get some social aid:

Sheriff suspends warrant checks at Social Services | Woodstock Times

Point of order:

Is it wrong for police to arrest criminals who have outstanding arrest warrants lawfully issued by a court?

Would it be better if police ignored the orders of the court?

Braineack 11-21-2014 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1184493)

Point of order:

Is it wrong for police to arrest criminals who have outstanding arrest warrants lawfully issued by a court?

Would it be better if police ignored the orders of the court?

I have no issues with what happened. I feel bad for the cop top be honest.

Joe Perez 11-23-2014 06:18 PM

White cops hate when black children play with toys.
Cleveland police officer fatally shoots 12-year-old boy with air gun
POSTED 4:49 PM, NOVEMBER 23, 2014, BY CNN, UPDATED AT 04:50PM, NOVEMBER 23, 2014

https://tribwpix.files.wordpress.com.../gun.png?w=770
“Airsoft gun” found on the juvenile involved in Saturday’s officer-involved shooting (Photo Credit: Fox 8)


https://localtvwjw.files.wordpress.c...pg?w=296&h=300
Tamir Rice
Photo Credit: Timothy Kucharski



CLEVELAND, Ohio (CNN) — A Cleveland police officer responding to a call about a person with a gun fatally wounded a 12-year-old boy brandishing what turned out to be an air gun that looked very much like a real firearm, police said early Sunday.

The shooting Saturday afternoon came as the nation nervously awaited a grand jury decision on whether to charge the police officer who killed African-American teenager Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in August.

The attorney for the family of the Cleveland youngster, who also was black, downplayed any possible racial connotations to the shooting.

“This is not a black and white issue. This is a right and wrong issue,” attorney Tim Kucharski said.

Police were summoned to the scene outside a recreation center by a 911 caller who said someone — possibly a juvenile — was pointing a gun at people.

“There’s a guy in there with a pistol, you know, it’s probably fake, but he’s like pointing it at everybody,” the caller said, according to audio provided by CNN affiliate WEWS.

“He’s sitting on a swing right now, but he’s pulling it in and out of his pants and pointing it at people,” the caller said. “He’s probably a juvenile, you know?”

When the two officers arrived, the boy — identified as Tamir E. Rice — did not point the weapon at them or otherwise threaten them, Deputy Chief Ed Tomba of the Cleveland Division of Police told reporters early Sunday.

But Rice did reach for the weapon, Tomba said.

“The officers ordered him to stop and to show his hands and he went into his waistband and pulled out the weapon,” he said.

Tomba showed reporters the weapon — a large, black BB- or pellet-type replica gun resembling a semiautomatic pistol. An orange tip indicating the gun was an air gun had been removed, police said.

It wasn’t clear if officers had been told the weapon was not a firearm, Officer Ali Pillow told CNN on Sunday.

Both officers have been placed on leave, police said.

The 12-year-old died early Sunday at MetroHealth Medical Center following surgery, according to the hospital and the family’s attorney.

People who had gathered around the early-morning media scrum with Tomba hurled angry questions at him, accusing police of unnecessary violence.

“It’s a toy gun and a 12-year-old,” a woman in the crowd yelled as reporters tried to ask questions, according to video provided by WEWS.

While saying a thorough and open investigation was under way, Tomba defended the officers’ actions in what he called a “very, very tragic situation.”

“They were doing their job,” he said.

Police shootings of African-Americans, particularly young men, have been under rising scrutiny in recent months following the shooting of Brown by a white officer following a brief confrontation in Ferguson.

A grand jury is expected to soon make a decision whether Officer Darren Wilson should face criminal charges in that incident, which resulted in widespread protests over police violence against African-Americans.


Cleveland police officer fatally shoots 12-year-old boy with air gun | New York's PIX11 / WPIX-TV

rleete 11-23-2014 07:48 PM

Removing the orange tip is what got him shot. Stupidity is it's own reward, sometimes.

Joe Perez 11-23-2014 08:51 PM


Originally Posted by rleete (Post 1184769)
Removing the orange tip is what got him shot. Stupidity is it's own reward, sometimes.

Rule #1: Always blame the victim.

Erat 11-24-2014 09:01 AM


Originally Posted by rleete (Post 1184769)
Removing the orange tip is what got him shot. Stupidity is it's own reward, sometimes.

Am i the only one to put the blame on shitty parenting?

Joe Perez 11-24-2014 09:22 AM


Originally Posted by Erat (Post 1184840)
Am i the only one to put the blame on shitty parenting?

If Scott has anything to say about it, yes.

It's unfair to hold people accountable for their own behavior. We should be able to act in any way we wish, without fear that people (including law enforcement) may mistake the intent of our actions, no matter how threatening they seem.

mgeoffriau 11-24-2014 09:33 AM


Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1184849)
If Scott has anything to say about it, yes.

It's unfair to hold people accountable for their own behavior. We should be able to act in any way we wish, without fear that people (including law enforcement) may mistake the intent of our actions, no matter how threatening they seem.

The level of false equivalence you'll reach for in your effort to make your point is stunning.

Braineack 11-24-2014 01:20 PM

kid was stupid. police were stupid. and im sure the kid didn't have parents, so erat is stupid. .02c

Braineack 11-24-2014 01:32 PM

This Police Chief's department so corrupt and shitty it brings him to tears:


Braineack 11-24-2014 01:34 PM

The only thing to fear in Utah are gun wielding maniacs:

Killings by Utah police outpacing gang, drug, child-abuse homicides | The Salt Lake Tribune


n the past five years, more Utahns have been killed by police than by gang members.

Or drug dealers. Or from child abuse.

...


Through October, 45 people had been killed by law enforcement officers in Utah since 2010, accounting for 15 percent of all homicides during that period.

A Salt Lake Tribune review of nearly 300 homicides, using media reports, state crime statistics, medical-examiner records and court records, shows that use of force by police is the second-most common circumstance under which Utahns kill each other, surpassed only by intimate partner violence.

Saturday’s shooting, which occurred after an officer responded to a trespassing call, remains under investigation.

Nearly all of the fatal shootings by police have been deemed by county prosecutors to be justified. Only one — the 2012 shooting of Danielle Willard by West Valley City police — was deemed unjustified, and the subsequent criminal charge was thrown out last month by a judge.

Braineack 11-24-2014 01:36 PM

Oh shit:

Giuliani: ?White police officers wouldn?t be there if you weren?t killing each other.? - The Washington Post


“Black people who kill black people go to jail,” Dyson said. “White people who are policemen who kill black people do not go to jail.”

...

“White police officers wouldn’t be there,” Giuliani said, “if you weren’t killing each other.”

Braineack 11-24-2014 01:37 PM

whatcha going to do if I violate his rights:


Braineack 11-24-2014 01:38 PM

If you sleep behind a carwash, expect to be woken up with violence, beat down, and tased:

[ll]07a_1402189168[/ll]

Braineack 11-24-2014 01:42 PM

I never got this pamphlet in HS:

New high school course: ?How to deal with cops? | New York Post


The principal of East Side Community HS invited the New York Civil Liberties Union to give a two-day training session last week on interacting with police.

The 450 kids were coached on staying calm during NYPD encounters and given a “What To Do If You’re Stopped By The Police” pamphlet.

NYCLU representatives told kids to be polite and to keep their hands out of their pockets. But they also told students they don’t have to show ID or consent to searches, that it’s best to remain silent, and how to file a complaint against an officer.
(then again I live in one of the best counties on the country.)

Braineack 11-24-2014 01:47 PM

these are the incompetent people you think will save you:


Braineack 11-24-2014 01:48 PM

cops hate cameras:


Braineack 11-25-2014 09:59 AM

witness restores video police deleted of an arrest:

Denver police accused of excessive force, illegal search | FOX31 Denver


A witness who recorded the August arrest on his Samsung Tablet tells Investigative Reporter Chris Halsne police not only seized the videotape over his objections, but when they returned it to him, the file was missing.

With the help of an electronic cloud, the witness recovered the 55 second video clip and provided a limited-use copy to FOX31 Denver for its investigation.

...

The videotape shows Evans holding down the suspect’s legs. A burly undercover officer can be seen bear-hugging Flores, lying on his side on the asphalt parking lot. Flores has his hands pinned behind his back.

Officer Jones can be heard yelling at Flores to “Spit the drugs out! Spit the drugs out!”

When Flores fails to open his mouth, Jones punches him with a closed fist six times in the face.

The videotape shows the suspect’s head bouncing off the pavement as a result of the force. FOX31 Denver also obtained exclusive pictures of Flores inside an ambulance a short time later, which show obvious trauma to his head and face.

...

While Officer Jones is punching Flores, the videotape captures the loud sounds of a woman screaming in Spanish for police to stop. A few seconds later, a visibly pregnant woman approaches the area where the officers are on top of Flores. Officer Jones reaches out and sweeps her feet out from under her. It appears on video, the woman, 25-year-old Mayra Lazos-Guerrero, falls hard on her stomach and face.

Officer Jones reported to a superior he thought the woman was going to kick him.


...

t is apparent from the videotape at least one of the officers sees Frasier. The word “camera!” can be heard on tape shortly after Jones punches Flores.

Frasier tells FOX31 Denver, officers on scene threatened him with arrest — demanded he turn over all photos and videotape to them, then seized his tablet over his objections.

“When he took it, I said ‘Hey! You can’t do that. You need a warrant for that!’ and he said ‘What program did you take the video with? Where is that?’” Frasier told Halsne in a recorded interview.

Frasier says police ignored his objections and dug through his personal photos without obtaining a court order.

Frasier: “The first officer that comes up to ask me about my witness statement brings me to the police car and says we could do this the easy way or we could do this the hard way.”

Halsne: When they said we can do this the easy way or the hard way, how did you take that?

Frasier: “It was taken as ‘you can either cooperate and give us what we want or we’re going to incarcerate you.’”

Although official police reports mention an officer thought Frasier took video, there is nothing written about taking, searching, or possessing his tablet. That’s something Frasier swears occurred.

By the time the officer returned his tablet, Frasier tells Halsne, the video file was gone.

“I couldn’t believe it. My heart dropped. I know I just shot that video, like it’s not on there now?”

After Frasier got home, he tells FOX31 Denver he synched his tablet with his electronic cloud. Within a few moments, the video file reappeared. Frasier says it’s “possible” both he and the police officer who looked through his tablet “missed seeing” the clip inside his Tablet files. However, Frasier suspects, in reality, the clip was deleted either with intention or by mistake.

Braineack 11-25-2014 10:13 AM

it is illegal to pick your kids up:



and this is what he did wrong:


he was sitting in a bank - a pulbic space, waiting for his kids to get out. Notice how the fat security gaurd didn't call about the other people sitting in the same area.

when leaving, a cop asked him for id and he refused, and that lead to the above arrest.

all his charges were dropped (trespassing, disorderly conduct, and obstructing legal process) and he's in the process of filing a lawsuit against the police.

viperormiata 11-26-2014 04:06 AM


Braineack 11-26-2014 07:50 AM

Discriminating town just made police very happy:

Louisiana Town to Kill All Pit Bulls and Rottweilers: Those Who Don’t Surrender Face Police Action | The Free Thought Project


TO ALL PITT BULL AND ROTTWEILER OWNERS:

PLEASE BE INFORMED THAT THE VILLAGE OF MOREAUVILLE IS ENFORCING THE ORDINANCE THAT WAS PASSED ON OCTOBER 13TH, 2014 THAT BANS PITT BULLS AND ROTTWEILERS WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF MOREAUVILLE, LA.

YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE THAT YOU HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 1, 2014 TO REMOVE YOUR PITT BULLS OR ROTTWEILERS FROM YOUR PREMISES. IF YOUR PITT BULLS OR ROTTWEILERS ARE NOT REMOVED BY THIS DATE, YOUR ANIMALS WILL BE IMPOUNDED AND TRANSPORTED TO A VETERINARY CLINIC FOR FURTHER DISPOSITION. YOU WILL ALSO BE FINED FOR VIOLATING THE ORDINANCE.
That's like telling criminals banks are no longer being locked up.


EDIT: n/m, they reversed their discriminating laws.

http://www.nola.com/news/baton-rouge..._reverses.html

mgeoffriau 11-26-2014 09:30 AM

LOL at "PITT BULLS".

Joe Perez 11-26-2014 10:54 AM

4 Attachment(s)
Sheriff: We Need Armored Vehicles to Intimidate People

"People may not understand why," said Sheriff's Capt. Greg Bean, "but an armored vehicle is almost a necessity now."

Here's why he says he needed one:

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1417017184

Looks can be deceiving, though, and in any event the man, at least, certainly looks very angry. So maybe we can assume that he was considered dangerous and—

"[Bean] also said that while [he] was never considered dangerous, he was known to be argumentative."

Oh. Well, we can't have that.

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1417017184

According to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel (both photos by Ryan Lister), the armored car was sent as backup for the 24 armed officers that had already been sent to the not-dangerous-but-known-to-be-argumentative man's home. The reason for the commando operation: to collect on a civil judgment.

Roger and Marjorie Hoeppner live in Stettin, a tiny town outside of Wausau in Marathon County, Wisconsin. According to the Hoeppners' lawyer, his clients and the town have been litigating for years over the stacks of wooden pallets and other stuff in the Hoeppners' yard, some of which you can see above to the left of the urban assault vehicle. (Mr. Hoeppner has a pallet-repair business and restores antique tractors, the report says.) In 2010 the town claimed Hoeppner was not complying with a settlement, and took further legal action. A judge found in its favor, and after fines, legal fees, and a failed appeal, by October 2 Hoeppner owed the town about $80,000.

Neither the report nor the appellate opinion suggest that, up to this point, any of this was very unfair to the Hoeppners. They stipulated to a contempt judgment and had agreed to do certain things, and apparently just didn't. If that happens, at some point the sheriff will get called in to enforce the judgment. This is not about that.

This is about the 24 officers and the tank.

Armored car, technically, but it does have the extra-scary turret. And according to Cap'n Bean, that's why they need it: to scare people.
Bean also said the armored truck was summoned only after Hoeppner initially refused to come out of his house. Once the truck appeared, so did Hoeppner.

"I've been involved in about five standoff situations where, as soon as the [armor] showed up, the person gives up," saving time, money and increasing safety, Bean said.
This was followed by the "an armored vehicle is almost a necessity now" quote, so this seems to be why he believes it's a "necessity." But he had already admitted that Hoeppner was "never considered dangerous," so even if that argument held water in other cases, it doesn't here. If he's saying that cops need an armored vehicle so they can intimidate even people they do not consider dangerous, well, that seems like a good reason they shouldn't be allowed to have one at all.

And remember why they were at the Hoeppners' house: to collect a judgment. The Hoeppners hadn't committed a crime, they just owed the city money. I've never actually had to try to collect a judgment, and I understand it can be difficult—sometimes you have to seize and auction assets, garnish wages, or stuff like that. But apparently the city didn't want to bother with all that:
Bean said deputies had to handcuff Hoeppner because he was not following all their instructions, but did eventually agree to pay the $80,000 judgment after a visit to a bank — accompanied by deputies.
Wait—they arrested him, drove him to the bank, and stood there while he withdrew the cash from his account? Is that legal? Somebody help me out here. Because it sounds kind of like robbery.

Sheriff: We Need Armored Vehicles to Intimidate People - Lowering the Bar

mgeoffriau 11-26-2014 12:08 PM

I don't see the problem. If you'll just quietly and meekly comply with any and all demands, then the police won't have to threaten you with bodily harm with a military-style armored truck.

sixshooter 11-26-2014 05:10 PM

Sometimes bad guys are ready to kill a cop:


Joe Perez 11-26-2014 05:19 PM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 1185349)
I don't see the problem. If you'll just quietly and meekly comply with any and all demands, then the police won't have to threaten you with bodily harm with a military-style armored truck.

Precisely.

The police gave Tamir Rice a full two seconds to comply with their demans before shooting him, and he still failed to comply.


sixshooter 11-26-2014 05:37 PM

PSA featuring the voice of Snoop Dogg: "If a cop rolls up and you are holding a pistol **Drop it like it's hot**"

I know he's twelve but that's pretty stupid.

Braineack 12-01-2014 08:37 AM

Id please? no? How about a chokehold?

[ll]acc_1417397640[/ll]

Braineack 12-01-2014 08:40 AM

dont get into road rage with a cop:


they will shoot you in the face. im sure the "officer" felt threatened.

Braineack 12-01-2014 08:42 AM

forget road rage, walking on a sidewalk makes police nervous:

[ll]43a_1417206562[/ll]

“You were walking by,” the deputy said.

“Walking by and doing what?” McKean asked.

“You were making people nervous,” the deputy said.

“By walking by?”

“Yeah, they said you had your hands in your pockets.”

Braineack 12-01-2014 08:46 AM

hey look, this cop hesitated about 1 second before firing, THEN yells put your hands up.


dude survived the shot and then filed a lawsuit.

he was eventually found dead in that same parking lot with a bullet to the head: http://www.annarbor.com/news/man-sho...mmits-suicide/

murder?

Braineack 12-01-2014 08:49 AM

1 Attachment(s)
The 5th Amendment


did you not swear an oath to uphold the constitution?

we uphold the law.


https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1417441923



Please notice: His refusal to answer her question results in him admitting he was drinking.

Braineack 12-01-2014 01:00 PM

If you're going to wave food at cops, wave a donut:

Man arrested; deputies say he aimed banana at them : News : CarolinaLive.com


A man is facing a felony menacing charge after two western Colorado sheriff's deputies say he pointed a banana at them and they thought it was a gun.

The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel reports 27-year-old Nathan Rolf Channing, of Fruitvale, was arrested Sunday.

According to an arrest affidavit, Mesa County deputies Joshua Bunch and Donald Love said they feared for their lives even though they saw that the object was yellow. Bunch wrote in the affidavit that he has seen handguns in many shapes and colors.

He wrote that Love was drawing his service weapon when Channing yelled, "It's a banana!"

The deputies say Channing told them he was doing a trial run for a planned YouTube video and he thought it would "lighten the holiday spirit."

Braineack 12-01-2014 01:02 PM

stupid cops.

Are College Educated Police Safer? - The Daily Beast


According to a 2006 report by USA Today, “In an analysis of disciplinary cases against Florida cops from 1997 to 2002, the International Association of Chiefs of Police found that officers with only high school educations were the subjects of 75% of all disciplinary actions. Officers with four-year degrees accounted for 11% of such actions.”

Braineack 12-02-2014 07:50 AM

weird.

this cop kicks and hits a guy in handcuffs and tries to delete the footage of it, and loses his job. i dont get it. I thought that was police work.

[ll]948_1417479403[/ll]


A Buffalo cop facing two years in prison for kicking a man in handcuffs in an incident captured on video was handed probation today on the condition that he will serve as a role model for other officers inclined to beat citizens.

John Cirulli also threatened to arrest the man who had video recorded the incident if he did not delete the footage, but that tidbit apparently wasn't part of the charges the 31-year-old was facing.

Cirulli, who resigned from the force shortly after video of the April incident went viral, admitted he took the man's phone, checked it for a recording and handed it back when he found nothing.

But that was only because the man who recorded the incident handed the cop a different phone that did not contain the recording, fooling the cop into thinking nothing had been recorded.

Thanks to that experience, Cirulli is now an authority on the "dangers of civil rights violations" and is working with the FBI in providing training sessions to other cops on what not to do.

Evidently, this is something that is not addressed in the police academy.

Enginerd 12-02-2014 11:05 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1186400)
weird.

this cop kicks and hits a guy in handcuffs and tries to delete the footage of it, and loses his job. i dont get it. I thought that was police work.

Oddly enough, I recently read another article about a guy being saved by "the cloud." The police tried to delete his footage, he recovered it, and then filed a lawsuit. :rofl:

Braineack 12-03-2014 11:41 AM

8 minutes of sheriffs wasting everyone's time.


Braineack 12-03-2014 11:51 AM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 1186167)
Id please? no? How about a chokehold?

[ll]acc_1417397640[/ll]


Viral Video Sparks Debate Over Failure to Identify, Officer Disciplined | Corpus Christi, TX | KRISTV.com |


Corpus Christi PD Chief Simpson released a statement adding, "Based on the news stories aired locally and on the internet, it was brought to our attention that an Officer had requested Ms. Espinosa to delete the video that was recorded. We viewed the entire dashcam video and found the conversation between Officer Lockhart and Ms. Espinosa. It was discovered that Officer Lockhart did request that the video be deleted. Officer Lockhart took full responsibility for his statement on the video and was formally disciplined for those actions. A memo, to the entire department, will follow on Wednesday regarding Texas Penal Code Sec. 38.02 'Failure to Identify' and our commitment to transparency by allowing citizens who wish to photograph or record our officers in a public space."

There were no specifics provided on how the officer was disciplined.

Joe Perez 12-03-2014 03:20 PM

In other news, a grand jury has decided that it's ok for NYPD officers to murder people guilty of minor crimes by strangling them to death.

Grand jury declines to indict officer in chokehold death of Eric Garner: sources | New York's PIX11 / WPIX-TV

Oddly, no looting and rioting here in NYC. I guess we're ok with it.

Braineack 12-03-2014 04:45 PM

NYC is north of Mason Dixon.

Braineack 12-04-2014 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by Joe Perez (Post 1186850)
Oddly, no looting and rioting here in NYC. I guess we're ok with it.

No justice, no tree

Braineack 12-05-2014 08:10 AM

the problem with police: this officer is going to be fired for NOT using enough force on a suicidal student, who hurt no one; not even himself.

Calif. cop may be fired for giving suicidal student water instead of Tasing him


The Salinas Californian reported that Soloman said the Monterey Bay officer managed to calm the student and get him to sit down before his colleagues from Marina reached the scene.

But the other officers used their Tasers on the student after their college colleague left the room to fulfill the student’s request for a glass of water. The campus officer subsequently refused to follow an order to use his own Taser on the student. The student was treated at a local hospital for superficial cuts but was not seriously injured.

Rodriguez’s department later issued a “failure to act” complaint against the campus officer, accusing him of not engaging in a “highly agitated situation.”

Braineack 12-05-2014 08:33 AM

1 Attachment(s)
cops hate cameras:


http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp...4-09.40.11.png

Joe Perez 12-05-2014 08:53 AM

Protesters attempt to block Times Square.

We don't tolerate that shit.

Protesters clash with NYPD in Times Square | New York's PIX11 / WPIX-TV

Braineack 12-05-2014 09:05 AM

im surprised Eric Holder didn't have all the cops arrested.

Joe Perez 12-05-2014 10:50 AM

Cops hate it when you point bananas at them:



FOLLOWUP: Also Don't Point Anything at an Officer. Even a Banana.

With remarkable timing, someone sent me this item just as I was publishing a post about what to do and not do when encountering officers at internal checkpoints. I did mention that you should "not do anything crazy," and just to clarify, that includes pointing anything—anything at all—at a police officer.

Because they plainly could mistake anything at all for a weapon.

According to FOX31 in Colorado, 27-year-old Nathen Channing was arrested Sunday night "for pointing a banana at a pair of Mesa County Sheriff’s deputies, both of whom initially believed the piece of fruit was a handgun." The deputies were driving (in separate cars) and the man was walking on the sidewalk. This is what happened next—

—I'm sorry, I just noticed the first officer's name is "Bunch" so I had to contemplate that for a second.

Okay, here's what happened next:
Eventually, [Deputy] Bunch wrote, Channing "reached into the left side of his coat and pulled out a yellow object, pointing it into the air then in my direction as I approached him."

"Fearing it was a weapon," Bunch wrote that he sped off. And knowing [Deputy] Love was traveling behind him, Bunch said he radioed his fellow deputy to warn him. As he returned to the area, Bunch wrote he witnessed Channing point the same object at Love.

As Love got out of his vehicle and approached Channing, Bunch wrote, his fellow deputy said he "observed what appeared to be a yellow tube with a black center" and also stated he "thought it was a gun."

"Deputy Love stated he was in fear for his life at this point and was in the process of pulling out his handgun when Nathen yelled, 'It's a banana!'" Bunch wrote.
Where to start?

Let's start with Channing, who admitted he did this as a "trial run" for a YouTube video somewhat similar to the kind I just mentioned (at the link above). As Deputy Bunch wrote in his arrest affidavit, Channing's "only explanation for pointing the banana at law enforcement was [that] it was a joke. He thought it would 'lighten the holiday spirit.'" It would have, and I guess it has anyway, for different reasons. But it could also have lightened the officers' guns by several grams. That's the problem.

Then of course there are the deputies who claim to have mistaken a banana for a gun. I actually think it's hard to criticize them too much here, given that somebody pointed something at them while they were driving by and couldn't observe too closely. At the very least, they'd have been justified in stopping to read this guy the riot act if only to deter him from pointing anything at police officers. But it does seem a little ridiculous to actually arrest a man and charge him with "felony menacing" because he pointed a banana at you.

According to Bunch, at least, a banana could resemble a handgun. "Based on training and experience," he wrote, "I have seen handguns in many shapes and colors and perceived this [yellow tube with a black center] to be a handgun." Are there curved yellow handguns? Maybe so. [Update: there are yellow ones, at least.] Bunch continued, describing the Banana Incident in typical police-report manner: the suspect, "by physical action, knowingly placed Deputy Love and I in imminent fear by use of an article fashioned in the manner to cause us to reasonably believe it was a deadly weapon." Well, he didn't fashion it that way himself, as Deputy Bunch of all people should know, but he did take it out and point it at police officers. Don't do that. With anything.

Monty Python explained this decades ago, but it's worth a refresher.



FOLLOWUP: Also Don't Point Anything at an Officer. Even a Banana. - Lowering the Bar

JasonC SBB 12-05-2014 12:11 PM

Here's an excellent article:
Why It?s Impossible to Indict a Cop | The Nation


Police shootings are only one function of living in one of the most heavily policed societies in the world. Any movement to roll back this creeping overcriminalization is going to have to look beyond criminal prosecutions of individual police and take in the big picture.

The first step to controlling the police is to get rid of the fantasy, once and for all, that the law is on our side. The law is firmly on the side of police who open fire on unarmed civilians.

The lethal use of police force typically sets off an internal police investigation to determine if departmental regulations were violated. The regs and the law are not the same thing. Case in point: the chokehold that NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo used to strangle Eric Garner, suspected of selling loose cigarettes, on Staten Island last July. (The grand jury bill on that case has still not been decided.) The chokehold is not prohibited by law, but it is by departmental rules. The violation might earn a departmental censure of some kind, from loss of vacation days to getting fired, but they tend to be radically mild, when not nonexistent.

What about internal affairs investigations? On television they are aggressive, dogged, uncompromising. In real life they tend to insulate the police from serious external sanction.

Civil suits for monetary damages require a lower standard of proof than criminal cases, but these suits are not a slam-dunk for victims of cop violence, either. The same jurisprudence that grants wide leeway to law enforcement still holds. Last March, one victim’s family lost a federal civil suit for wrongful death and civil rights violations brought against police officer Nicholas Bennallack for fatally shooting a fleeing and unarmed drug suspect. The jury believed the cop’s claim that he opened fire out of fear for his life.

What about all the times when excessive force suits get settled out of court? It turns out that massive payouts don’t deter police misconduct for one straightforward reason: neither individual officers nor police departments are responsible for coughing up the cash. The union covers the officer’s lawyer, and research from Joanna Schwartz of UCLA Law School found that governments, not individual officers, paid out 99.98 percent of the damages. Settlements and damages aren’t paid by the police department, whose budget will waltz by untouched, but typically out of the general municipal budget.

Braineack 12-05-2014 12:20 PM

It's really this simple:

Typically when you are in front of the GJ, the prosecutor is presenting state's evidence to show there's a case to go forward with charges.

When an officer is involved, the prosecutor is presenting state's evidence to show there's NO case to go forward with charges.

So if you or I was to go before a GJ, they'd try to prove with everything they got that I'm guilty of a crime.
If a cop is in the same boat, the state uses only what they need to use to prove there's no guilt.


plus people who serve on GJs are typically semi-MR.


Payouts settled out of court will never stop certain behaviors. The city pays; it doesn't even affect the department whatsoever. So if the worst that happens when a cop is found guilty of a crime while on duty is that he gets fired and someone else pays for the crime, why would you ever direct your officers to behave better at the ultimate cost at not getting as many arrests on record to get increased funding next year?

Joe Perez 12-05-2014 01:58 PM

4 Attachment(s)
Most of us have heard the term "reading the riot act," and I expect that among such an august crowd as this, a few of us have actually taken it upon ourselves to track down and read the full text of the act itself.

For those unaware, The Riot Act is a piece of law issued in 1714 in Great Britain during the reign of King George I. This was a time of considerable civil unrest in England, during which lots of white people who wanted to make sure that nobody was allowed to worship God in a manner different from their own spent quite a lot of time detroying things and acting in a manner broadly incompatible with the teachings of Christ. Parliament felt that allowing their citizens to run around burning each other's churches to the ground and generally making life unpleasant for all involved probably needed to stop, and as lawmakers are apt to do, they passed a law authorizing the police to do unpleasant things to people who rioted.

Section III of the Riot Act, in particular, is of interest:

...and that if the persons so unlawfully, riotously and tumultuously assembled, or any of them, shall happen to be killed, maimed or hurt, in the dispersing, seizing or apprehending, or endeavouring to disperse, seize or apprehend them, that then every such justice of the peace, sheriff, under-sheriff, mayor, bailiff, head-officer, high or petty constable, or other peace-officer, and all and singular persons, being aiding and assisting to them, or any of them, shall be free, discharged and indemnified, as well against the King's Majesty, his heirs and successors, as against all and every other person or persons so unlawfully, riotously and tumultuously assembled, that shall happen to be so killed, maimed or hurt, as aforesaid.

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1417805925
In simple terms, this says that if you are behaving unlawfully, and we (LEOs) have given you a warning to stop, then we cannot be held liable for any harm which subsequently comes to you as a result of our using force to obtain your compliance.

Or, in even simpler terms: If you riot, then it's your ass.





In practice, it is a system which worked reasonably well. So well, in fact, that the fundamental concept of the Riot Act was subsequently incorporated into the laws of a number of other nations.

Including the US.

In 1792.

By The Founders.

They called it The Militia Act.
That whenever the laws of the United States shall be opposed or the execution thereof obstructed, in any state, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, (...) it shall be lawful for the President of the United States to call forth the militia of such state to suppress such combinations, and to cause the laws to be duly executed.

http://callisto.ggsrv.com/imgsrv/Fas...eal_10_img1889

Trivia: the powers authorized under the Militia Act were first used in 1794 by _______________, who ordered the Militia to attack and suppress protesters who were assembled to petition the government for a redress of grievances concerning the tax on Whiskey.




Answer: President George Washington.

Braineack 12-05-2014 02:38 PM

I was going to say Jack Bauer.

Joe Perez 12-05-2014 10:26 PM

Cops hate it when you beg for their help while you are being killed to death:


Transgender woman shot to death while pounding on door for help
POSTED 1:07 PM, DECEMBER 5, 2014, BY JEREMY TANNER, UPDATED AT 01:44PM, DECEMBER 5, 2014

LOS ANGELES (PIX11) - A young transgender woman was pounding on the door of a South Los Angeles home, begging for help, when a car pulled up and someone shot her to death, police say.

Deshawnda Sanchez, 21, ran up to the home on South Wilton Place and West 62nd Street around 4 a.m.

“She was definitely at that door, pounding on that door seeking help,” LAPD Detective Christopher Barling told KTLA.

By the time the occupants got to the door, however it was too late. Gunshots rang out and Sanchez, known as “Tata” to her friends, was fatally injured.

https://tribwpix.files.wordpress.com.../capture3.jpeg
Sanchez was gunned down in front of a South L.A. home. Detectives say she was pounding on the door for help when she was shot.

It’s not clear what connection, if any, Sanchez might have had with the residents of the home.

The incident was recorded by a neighbor’s personal surveillance camera. A car can be seen pulling up to the front of the house, one person gets out and runs up to the porch, and then, seconds later, runs back to the car and drives off.

“The footage, it was heartbreaking,” Sanchez’ sister Diana Williams told reporters.

No arrests have been made and police are not ruling out the possibility of a hate crime, although detectives say they believe she may have been running from a robber.


Transgender woman shot to death while pounding on door for help | New York's PIX11 / WPIX-TV

JasonC SBB 12-07-2014 11:13 AM

What I've Learned from Two Years Collecting Data on Police Killings


Nowhere could I find out how many people died during interactions with police in the United States. Try as I might, I just couldn't wrap my head around that idea. How was it that, in the 21st century, this data wasn't being tracked, compiled, and made available to the public? ..How could cops possibly know "best practices" for dealing with any fluid situation? They couldn't."

The biggest thing I've taken away from this project is something I'll never be able to prove, but I'm convinced to my core: The lack of such a database is intentional. No government—not the federal government, and not the thousands of municipalities that give their police forces license to use deadly force—wants you to know how many people it kills and why.

It's the only conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence. What evidence? In attempting to collect this information, I was lied to and delayed by the FBI, even when I was only trying to find out the addresses of police departments to make public records requests. The government collects millions of bits of data annually about law enforcement in its Uniform Crime Report, but it doesn't collect information about the most consequential act a law enforcer can do.

I've been lied to and delayed by state, county and local law enforcement agencies—almost every time. They've blatantly broken public records laws, and then thumbed their authoritarian noses at the temerity of a citizen asking for information that might embarrass the agency. And these are the people in charge of enforcing the law.

The second biggest thing I learned is that bad journalism colludes with police to hide this information. The primary reason for this is that police will cut off information to reporters who tell tales. And a reporter can't work if he or she can't talk to sources.

Joe Perez 12-07-2014 02:03 PM


Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 1187662)
The second biggest thing I learned is that bad journalism colludes with police to hide this information.

Despite my familiarity with your longstanding prejudice against journalists and journalism, this is where I get confused.

Most of the time, Jason seems to be a staunch supporter of free-market capitalism, and yet here he is again re-posting someone else's opinion of why the natural outcome of a free press operating in a free market is evidence of some sort of presumed conspiracy.

Braineack 12-08-2014 01:38 PM

lol

Beloit Police Ask Residents To Volunteer To Have Their Homes Searched For Guns | Wisconsin Public Radio


Police in Beloit are launching a new effort to reduce gun violence in which they're asking city residents to volunteer to have police search their homes for guns.

...

"Gun violence is as serious as the Ebola virus is being represented in the media, and we should fight it using the tools that we've learned from our health providers,” he said.

Jacobs said he hopes some searches will result in the discovery of guns they didn't know were in their own homes. He said that there’s also a chance they’ll find guns linked to crimes.

“That's really what we're looking for,” he said. “Maybe we'll find a toy gun that's been altered by a youngster in the house — and we know the tragedies that can occur there on occasion.”

viperormiata 12-08-2014 06:06 PM

Is this real life?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands