Notices

2560 on a 99 motor at 14psi with MSPNP 300hp - 241ft/lbs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #81  
Rafa's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,224
Total Cats: 3
From: Sunny Spanish speaking Non US Caribbean
Default

Originally Posted by DammitBeavis
It's all personal preference. The stock coils are fairly strong, so from a 'performance per dollar' standpoint you shouldn't change anything. If I were going to mess with it, I'd rather go CDI than COP. The 4-channel system can be used for 2-channel if you don't know which direction you are going to go. But I don't think the 4-channel system has the arm/disarm ability, only the MAP sensor (which would work fine really, I'm just a control freak).
Many thanks for your input. Let me make a suggestion to you. It's clear you know what you're talking about when it comes to knock sensing. Why don't you start a new thread on the subject so those of us with absolutely no knowledge on the subject and willing to get additional info on the subject may take advantage of it.

I for one currently use a knocksense sensor and I'm not satisfied with the results so I'm ready to ask more stupid questions

Thanks,

Rafa
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 03:47 PM
  #82  
DammitBeavis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 281
Total Cats: 0
From: EXTREME Southern Illinois
Default

I agree that this needs to be in it's own thread (sorry Paul). I'll refrain from further tangents in this one, but a search would dig it up anyway. I don't think I have much more I can add, but feel free to copy/paste this stuff into a new thread and I'll keep an eye on it if it interests anyone.
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 01:28 PM
  #83  
AbeFM's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 13
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Hmmm, so it's still not really an analog signal? Weird weird.

What I'm looking for is an RPM dependent threshold. Maybe I could run the knock sensor output through a digital pot. Seems a bit of a hack, though.... Timing it well makes sense, and might actually be all you need. The knock itself doesn't get louder, only the background noise...

Originally Posted by DammitBeavis
I agree that this needs to be in it's own thread (sorry Paul). I'll refrain from further tangents in this one, but a search would dig it up anyway. I don't think I have much more I can add, but feel free to copy/paste this stuff into a new thread and I'll keep an eye on it if it interests anyone.
You could link to a new thread from this one, get people to notice it. :-) I don't have any problems with my Toyota COP set up, and I've bought those for as low as $15/ea. Cheaper than keeping the stock ones since the first time you buy plug wires you're over the cost of cheap COP....
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 08:51 PM
  #84  
boileralum's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,108
Total Cats: 233
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Paul, you have changed your sig. Can you repost your setup for this dyno? I'm specifically interested in what injectors you are running. I will be running a 00 engine w/ a 2560r in my car as well and am curious about injector headroom.
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #85  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default



added BEGi intake manifold....don't expect this much power on your own setup.
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #86  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

Did I miss what EMS this is on? If MS.... post the map
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #87  
Zabac's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,850
Total Cats: 8
From: High Point NC
Default

yeah, paul runs MS, i think he uses 550cc injectors...

would ya look at that tq line, goddam

congrats Paul
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #88  
gohdunlam's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by miataz
**** nice man


+1 dam that is some nice #'s
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #89  
AbeFM's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 13
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack


added BEGi intake manifold....don't expect this much power on your own setup.
Doesn't look like it's exactly falling apart up there. Could have revved it another 1k and hit well over 300 ponies?
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #90  
paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by boileralum
Paul, you have changed your sig. Can you repost your setup for this dyno? I'm specifically interested in what injectors you are running. I will be running a 00 engine w/ a 2560r in my car as well and am curious about injector headroom.

At the time of the 271hp pull I was running 460s and right up near the 80% duty cycle mark.
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #91  
soflarick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 884
Total Cats: 0
From: Floriduh
Default

What is the duty cycle with the current state of tune?
Was the intake the sole reason for the performance increase from 271? How's the street driveability with the BEGI intake compared to the OEM?
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #92  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

I would have thought the 70mm (?) "mustang" throttlebody would affect driveability but I am pretty sure he felt no difference.

I felt a big difference between the '94 progressive throttle linkage throttle body and the newer style wheel/linear OEM throttle body.
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #93  
AbeFM's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,047
Total Cats: 13
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
I would have thought the 70mm (?) "mustang" throttlebody would affect driveability but I am pretty sure he felt no difference.

I felt a big difference between the '94 progressive throttle linkage throttle body and the newer style wheel/linear OEM throttle body.
Could you elaborate? "A big difference" doesn't tell which you liked better, and I'm very curious.....


I'm still curious about the relatively short run on the dyno, I thought this car was being run up to 8k or 8,500, or was that another?
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #94  
paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by soflarick
What is the duty cycle with the current state of tune?
Was the intake the sole reason for the performance increase from 271? How's the street driveability with the BEGI intake compared to the OEM?
70% duty cycle during that dyno pull.

the only things changed from the 271 pull in Dec and the 300 pull in April were the BEGi turbo intake manifold & 70mm throttle body and the bigger injectors. the injectors can be eliminated from the equation since my AFR's were great in both scenarios.

the car idles perfectly with the bigger throttle body with no idle air controller and the the driveability is great. it's smooth, easy to control, no different than with the factory intake mani and throttlebody

Originally Posted by AbeFM
I'm still curious about the relatively short run on the dyno, I thought this car was being run up to 8k or 8,500, or was that another?
My hard rev limit is set to 7200 rpm so you must be thinking of a different car.
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 11:12 PM
  #95  
flier129's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,750
Total Cats: 320
From: Statesville, NC
Default

can i haz it?!

omg i want that tq curve....... at those numbers !

i want absurflow, where can i get it paul? help a newb out
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 11:30 PM
  #96  
MikeRiv87's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 487
Total Cats: 1
From: Central, NJ
Default

ShoreMotorsports, Contact TurboTim on this forum for details and pricing...
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 11:36 PM
  #97  
flier129's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,750
Total Cats: 320
From: Statesville, NC
Default

awesome, thx !
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #98  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
I felt a big difference between the '94 progressive throttle linkage throttle body and the newer style wheel/linear OEM throttle body.
With the GT2560 or the GT2554?
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #99  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by AbeFM
Could you elaborate? "A big difference" doesn't tell which you liked better, and I'm very curious.....


I'm still curious about the relatively short run on the dyno, I thought this car was being run up to 8k or 8,500, or was that another?
I like the original '94 progressive linkage TB better than the linear TB, but I'm sorta used to it now. If the linkage could fit in my application, I would definitely go back.

Paul's car was definitely not reved to 8k, you must be thinking of someone else. I dunno who.

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
With the GT2560 or the GT2554?
With two GT1548's. But it doesn't matter; what I'm taking about is right off idle. For me it was much more difficult to be smooth right off idle with the linear linkage.
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #100  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

I have a 94 progressive TB on the shelf which I bought for the effect you describe; I'd like to install it but it will need a check valve and a small K&N filter for the idle air...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.