GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat
I've said all along.
67 (dynojet) ft-lbs per liter per atmo of MAP is what you can get with good tuning and an efficient setup. Maybe as high as 71-72.
Power is just then a function of how little your torque droops at high RPM.
67 (dynojet) ft-lbs per liter per atmo of MAP is what you can get with good tuning and an efficient setup. Maybe as high as 71-72.
Power is just then a function of how little your torque droops at high RPM.
****, i did hp, not torque. FAIL!
that actually ends up spot on
67 * 1.8 * 2 = 241
I rounded the 14psi up to 2bar just for the hell of it. Car did make 242. Without rounding that puts me at 68.
that actually ends up spot on
67 * 1.8 * 2 = 241
I rounded the 14psi up to 2bar just for the hell of it. Car did make 242. Without rounding that puts me at 68.
Man, I have been hoping to break 250 on Friday when I go to the dyno.
Looking at my last plot (with the bad turbine), I was holding torque flat till 6500.
Based off these numbers I should be close to 268rwhp at 15 pounds.
Looking at my last plot (with the bad turbine), I was holding torque flat till 6500.
Based off these numbers I should be close to 268rwhp at 15 pounds.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
1 atm = 14.7psi (101.3 kpa)
lets see...based on my last dyno @9.5psi 211 ft-lb / (1.8L * 1.646) = 71.2 ft-lb/L
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
tell me more about this "crossover" region and how I can use it to make my car more awesome.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








