Notices

GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #1  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat

this is from 2001

The blue trace is my car / 167 kPa boost
The red trace is a GT2560 on a gen 1 FM2 / NA 1.8 / 13 psi.
Attached Thumbnails GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat-gt2554-gt2560-2001.jpg  
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 06:49 PM
  #2  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

242 is really impressive for a 2554.


HOLY ****! Only 167kpa??>?!>!!>#$!@
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #3  
JTod's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 99
Total Cats: -6
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

I realize the turbo is different now but how do you think the ETD shorty compares to the AVO flow wise? The AVO appears to be the best flowing cast mani available.
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #4  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Better.
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 08:53 PM
  #5  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

I've said all along.

67 (dynojet) ft-lbs per liter per atmo of MAP is what you can get with good tuning and an efficient setup. Maybe as high as 71-72.

Power is just then a function of how little your torque droops at high RPM.
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Assuming 67 kPa boost, 167 kPA Absolute.

Nice num-bars.
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #7  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
67 (dynojet) ft-lbs per liter per atmo of MAP is what you can get with good tuning and an efficient setup. Maybe as high as 71-72.

formula is spot on to my last good dyno run. 205 rwtq @ 13psi.

67 * 1.6 * 1.884 = 202rwtq
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #8  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

hmm, not for me

67 * 1.8 * 2 != 300

x * 1.8 * 2 = 300

x = 83
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #9  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

****, i did hp, not torque. FAIL!

that actually ends up spot on

67 * 1.8 * 2 = 241

I rounded the 14psi up to 2bar just for the hell of it. Car did make 242. Without rounding that puts me at 68.
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #10  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by paul
****, i did hp, not torque. FAIL!
A mistake you see and more importantly you understand. Fail is how many don't understand the difference.
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #11  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Man, I have been hoping to break 250 on Friday when I go to the dyno.

Looking at my last plot (with the bad turbine), I was holding torque flat till 6500.

Based off these numbers I should be close to 268rwhp at 15 pounds.
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #12  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by paul
****, i did hp, not torque. FAIL!

that actually ends up spot on

67 * 1.8 * 2 = 241

I rounded the 14psi up to 2bar just for the hell of it. Car did make 242. Without rounding that puts me at 68.
actually you only fail because 1 bar = 14.5 psi...

1 atm = 14.7psi (101.3 kpa)



lets see...based on my last dyno @9.5psi 211 ft-lb / (1.8L * 1.646) = 71.2 ft-lb/L
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #13  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Looks like perhaps y8s is getting 71 because his giant turbo is operating at crossover (TIP < MAP)
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #14  
Laur3ns's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,054
Total Cats: 14
From: Enschede, NL
Default

Originally Posted by paul
242 is really impressive for a 2554.
HOLY ****! Only 167kpa??>?!>!!>#$!@
This SAE 242 number is at the flywheel right? Not the wheels... otherwise my plot really sucks at 215wheel, 250flywheel (14psi, GT2560R).
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #15  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Looks like perhaps y8s is getting 71 because his giant turbo is operating at crossover (TIP < MAP)
someone should tell the guy with the dyno dynamics setup. i made 226 ft-lbs there--at the same boost.

tell me more about this "crossover" region and how I can use it to make my car more awesome.
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #16  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

In a street car being in crossover sacrifices spoolup.

Spookyfish those are dynojet numbers ergo whp.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.