Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

The Definitive "VVT swap into 90-97 chassis" Megathread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2014 | 02:06 PM
  #41  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

If you have a standalone you probably have it wired so the ecu drives the tach even on the 94.
Old Aug 28, 2014 | 02:17 PM
  #42  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

That's what we're finding on our MSM swapped '92. In order to have a tach with '01+ coils, you need to have a tach output pin on the ECU to go to the cluster.

FYI: For those of you running Gen1 MSPNPs, DIYautotune will do the mod for a tach output pin for $75 once you ship it to them. I believe the schematic for a DIY circuit is floating around here somewhere.

I'm fairly certain Gen2 MSPNPs already have a tach output pin.
Old Aug 28, 2014 | 07:33 PM
  #43  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Note: this thread is meant for standalone ECU replacements, such as MS and AEM.

For those of you wanting to use a stock ECU, please keep the discussion in this thread:

https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-pe...athread-80666/

But to sum up: stock ECU won't see a tach signal with '01+ coils, and it'll kill itself within a few seconds.

Remember, DON'T discuss those issues here.
Old Aug 28, 2014 | 09:12 PM
  #44  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by curly
FYI: For those of you running Gen1 MSPNPs, DIYautotune will do the mod for a tach output pin for $75 once you ship it to them. I believe the schematic for a DIY circuit is floating around here somewhere.

I'm fairly certain Gen2 MSPNPs already have a tach output pin.
Only 90-93 Gen1 MSPNPs do not have a built in tach output. The Gen 1 94-95 and 96-97 already have it built in, as do all models Gen2 and Pro PNPs.

Example tach circuit for 90-93 Gen 1 is shown here:
MS1/Extra Hardware Manual

In most cases, I'd recommend purchasing an aftermarket tach adapter before sending an ECU in to be modified. Cost would be about the same or less and would eliminate down time.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 09:09 AM
  #45  
TheBandit's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

In the event that you plan to keep your 94-95 block and simply update to the VVT head, is it still recommended that I update to the crank trigger setup instead of the CAS that is on the original head? I certainly understand that new ignition (in my case I will upgrade to COPS) and VVT actuation will need to be wired in. The throttle body update is suggested, but not a have to. I'm starting to add up the wiring harness needed for the pigtails along with all the sensors and the difference in cost from just getting an entire 01+ engine gets smaller and smaller. Again, this is all assuming the use of MS EM.
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 09:38 AM
  #46  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

No way to control VVT without the crank sensor, so why keep the CAS?
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 09:45 AM
  #47  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

And you'll basically need to replace the oil pump in order to get the crank trigger on a 94-95. IIRC the boss is there so if you're a ******* judo master with a hand drill you could drill and tap it maybe.
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 11:21 AM
  #48  
TheBandit's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

So I might as well just get a complete VVT engine and stop trying to gather the parts to make it work with my 95 block. I'm still educating myself on the differences required to work with VVT. Thanks for the assistance.
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 09:07 PM
  #49  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

You also get an extra point of compression. Lots of good reasons to just source a full longblock.

Updated the OP to include the answer to your question.
Old Sep 6, 2014 | 11:09 AM
  #50  
joyrider's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 586
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Savington

1994-1997 coils:
+12v:
94-97: Blue
01-05: Black/White

trigger cyl 1/4:
94-97: brown
01-05: brown/white

trigger cyl 2/3:
94-97: brown/yellow
01-05: black/yellow

ground:
94-97, 01-05: black
1999-2000 coils:
+12v: Black/white

trigger cyl 1/4: Brown/Yellow

trigger cyl 2/3: Brown

ground: Black

Now, do we have to put capacitor as NB2 OEM harness ?
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 12:04 PM
  #51  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

99-00 coils are garbage, you're much better off retaining your stock 1.6/1.8 coils if you are doing a BP4W swap. I specifically left 99-00 coil info off the OP for that reason.
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 04:58 PM
  #52  
my97miata's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -52
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Or you can just go with the Fab9 COP's.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 05:09 PM
  #53  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Or you can use the perfectly adequate stock ignition system, vs. upgrading to a system with no benefits.
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 05:36 PM
  #54  
harrybeachdog's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 6
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by my97miata
Or you can just go with the Fab9 COP's.
What I did. They just look purty. Stock bottom end and they're fine, but testing DIYauto has done shows they're not ideal for big boost.

Originally Posted by Savington
Or you can use the perfectly adequate stock ignition system, vs. upgrading to a system with no benefits.
They fit in the hole. Every double meaning intended.
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 05:44 PM
  #55  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Stock coils fit in the hole too...
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 05:49 PM
  #56  
harrybeachdog's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 6
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

I thought the VVT vc had smaller holes for the wires?
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 05:51 PM
  #57  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

It does, and the stock VVT coils fit into the VVT holes. The 99-00 has the same holes as the 90-97, so you would just use stock 90-97 coils instead of the 99-00 coils. If you're going to go aftermarket, skip the fab 9 parts and go straight to an LS2 Truck coil setup.
  • If you are swapping a BP4W into a 90-97, use stock 90-97 coils and wires (preferably the 94-97 coils)
  • If you are swapping a BP6D (VVT) into a 90-97, use VVT coils and wires and wire them per the original post's instructions
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 05:52 PM
  #58  
harrybeachdog's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 53
Total Cats: 6
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Attached Thumbnails The Definitive "VVT swap into 90-97 chassis" Megathread.-the_more_you_know_banner.jpg  
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 06:55 PM
  #59  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by harrybeachdog
What I did. They just look purty. Stock bottom end and they're fine, but testing DIYauto has done shows they're not ideal for big boost.
A 3rd party has tested the coils; we have not. The 3rd party test was not flattering. I have no horse in the race, other than the vendor was blaming my ECU for the troubles with his product.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 07:52 PM
  #60  
greddygalant's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 771
Total Cats: 39
From: Beaverton, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
Only 90-93 Gen1 MSPNPs do not have a built in tach output. The Gen 1 94-95 and 96-97 already have it built in, as do all models Gen2 and Pro PNPs.

Example tach circuit for 90-93 Gen 1 is shown here:
MS1/Extra Hardware Manual

In most cases, I'd recommend purchasing an aftermarket tach adapter before sending an ECU in to be modified. Cost would be about the same or less and would eliminate down time.
Ben,
My 92 is the one curly mentioned, would you happen to have a link to an aftermarket tach adapter that would work for such an application?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 PM.