Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

The Definitive "VVT swap into 90-97 chassis" Megathread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2022 | 07:46 AM
  #641  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

John, yes.
Old Apr 18, 2022 | 07:09 PM
  #642  
collin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -38
From: Iowa
Default

So because there are 33 pages and I will probably find my answer right after asking I will ask for the sake of sanity. I just installed my 99-00 rail with my upside down 90-93 regulator. I have an issue where the 90 chassis didn't use disconnects on the fuel hoses. Does anyone have reccomendations on how to cleanly or easily make that swap? Did you just put new hoses over the weird lock fitting from the fuel rail?

Thanks!
Old Apr 18, 2022 | 07:15 PM
  #643  
collin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -38
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by curly
Just cut off the plastic line and clamp on the rubber line.
Just like that I found my answer!
Old Apr 18, 2022 | 07:55 PM
  #644  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

The OE plastic NB fuel line fittings that press into the plastic (nylon?) stock fuel lines do not have the correct style barb for generic rubber fuel hose. Depending on the type of hose you use and how much you clamp it down, they may cut through the inner wall of the hose. I believe @codrus had to deal this back when he was defuckulating the fuel system that had been installed by the PO of his Lowcost. I'd imagine he can weigh in on that one.
Old Apr 18, 2022 | 07:59 PM
  #645  
collin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -38
From: Iowa
Default

I realized that when I started messing around with it. I tried shoving the hose over the barb but there is no way I could non-destructively get it back off. I am not sure I want to risk running a strong clamp on it since the pressure inside the system is so high. Is there a cheapo way to flair the rail fitting?
Old Apr 19, 2022 | 12:54 AM
  #646  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by collin
I realized that when I started messing around with it. I tried shoving the hose over the barb but there is no way I could non-destructively get it back off. I am not sure I want to risk running a strong clamp on it since the pressure inside the system is so high. Is there a cheapo way to flair the rail fitting?
Your choice are, in roughly decreasing order of sketchiness:

1) Push the hose on the end of the metal line with no barb, put a worm gear clamp on loosely, and embrace flaming death.

2) get a stock fuel line and very very carefully slice the nylon line off the quick-disconnect-to-hose-barb without damaging the plastic barb part. Push a rubber 65-psi-rated fuel injection hose over the barb and put a proper fuel injector hose clamp on it. This is what FM's instructions for the original 99 FM2 kit said to do (the one with the Link piggyback computer and 4 extra injectors).

3) **** that and buy a Dorman nylon line repair part ($12 for a pack of 2) instead of trying to salvage an OEM one. Do the same thing with the proper hose and clamp.
Amazon Amazon

4) Get an all-metal quick-disconnect-to-AN fitting and put a bunch of other fancy AN fuel parts in your car. Like this:
Amazon Amazon
(note that there are fittings like this that use plastic locking inserts that are somewhat notorious for failing. get the all-metal one).

Somewhere in the middle is flaring the OEM line for an AN fitting. It's not really the right diameter (metric instead of SAE) and the steel is pretty hard. I'm not really a fan of it.

I have done 2, 3, and 4 in the past. Right now my car has #3 on it.

--Ian
Old Apr 19, 2022 | 10:54 AM
  #647  
collin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -38
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
3) **** that and buy a Dorman nylon line repair part ($12 for a pack of 2) instead of trying to salvage an OEM one. Do the same thing with the proper hose and clamp. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000E35WHO/
--Ian
This is what I think I will do! Thanks for the links, they are highly appreciated! Long term plans will be AN for everything but that's more money than I want to spend at the moment.
Old Apr 22, 2022 | 07:46 PM
  #648  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

I flared mine, it was fine. What is not fine is the close to the right size compression to AN fittings they sell for fuel lines on summit. The compression fitting and the coating on the factory fuel line dont agree with each other.
Old Jun 30, 2022 | 04:32 PM
  #649  
Avocado Westie's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'm hoping someone can help with a sanity check since I couldn't find any ITB info in the thread.
I've got a '96 motor with Jenvey ITBs on it and Jenvey sells the NB manifold separately. So I should be able to swap the whole setup over. If I do that, I don't need to mess with the throttle body, throttle cable, TPS, or anything from the fuel system. The only things that need changing are the alternator, coils, CAS, and VVT control or am I missing something?
Old Jun 30, 2022 | 09:02 PM
  #650  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

You'll keep your '96 alternator, wire the VVT coils, split your CAS wiring to the CMP and CKP, and add the VVT system, yes.

Typically there is interference issues fitting an NA TPS on an NB head, but that's because of the intake manifold design. It should fit the head just fine, same with throttle cable.
Old Jul 1, 2022 | 04:42 PM
  #651  
Avocado Westie's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2
Total Cats: 0
Default

Awesome, thanks. Fortunately it's in a kit car and running ITBs. So it's already got a custom throttle cable and the TPS is on the ITBs already.
This is the one time the ITBs seem to be saving me work instead of being a PITA.
Old Nov 20, 2022 | 05:59 PM
  #652  
DTMiller's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 0
Default

Thanks to all for the contributions to this thread, and for Rev answering some emails about my MS3 Basic.. Have a VVT motor dropped in the car and I think I have the wiring done. I'm trying to figure out how to route the fuel lines from the fuel rail and FPR to the hard lines. Flat top manifold. Anyone have a picture or sketch of how they routed the lines?

I currently have the line from the FPR running under the plenum and down through a gap in the manifold but the line to the rail that connects to the FPR sticking straight up is stumping me.
Old Nov 20, 2022 | 06:24 PM
  #653  
collin's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 135
Total Cats: -38
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by DTMiller
Anyone have a picture or sketch of how they routed the lines?.
Let me know if this isn't what you're looking for I probably have many more images or can build a folder you can have access to view of the entire build in photos.





I routed the return under the chargpipe and throttlebody.


Old Nov 22, 2022 | 06:04 AM
  #654  
DTMiller's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 0
Default

Thanks, any issues with the fuel hose rubbing the hood in that config?
Old Nov 22, 2022 | 09:19 AM
  #655  
Roda's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,647
Total Cats: 446
From: Sierra Vista, AZ
Default

I have mine setup in a similar fashion, but ran the fuel line tighter to the manifold, and down behind the throttle linkage. Not sure if that would work on a stock TB. I added an extra layer of hose for protection, but haven't noticed any evidence that the hood rubs on it. 5 years on the track with this setup and no issues. Ignore the arrows in the 2nd pic... was pointing out vac lines to someone in another thread.


Old Nov 22, 2022 | 09:53 AM
  #656  
DTMiller's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 9
Total Cats: 0
Default

Awesome. Thanks to both of you.
Old Jan 4, 2023 | 02:53 PM
  #657  
Ceboe's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 8
Total Cats: 0
Default

Does it matter if you use the 99-00 1.6 or 1.8 fuel rail? Or are they both the same?

Old Jan 4, 2023 | 03:09 PM
  #658  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Ceboe
Does it matter if you use the 99-00 1.6 or 1.8 fuel rail? Or are they both the same?

1.6 and 1.8 have different spacing between ports and na8 versus NB will be different as well
Old Jan 4, 2023 | 03:25 PM
  #659  
Ceboe's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 8
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
1.6 and 1.8 have different spacing between ports and na8 versus NB will be different as well
Allright so you need the 1.8 99-00 fuel rail.
​​Thanks!
Old Jan 26, 2023 | 12:28 AM
  #660  
rockplague's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 20
Total Cats: 1
From: USA
Default

Would a radium fuel rail & 90-93 FPR run into the same clearance issues? Just asking before I pull the trigger on a 99/00 fuel rail.
edit: haven't seen anyone do this, just gonna get the 99/00.

Last edited by rockplague; Jan 26, 2023 at 01:07 AM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.