Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

The Definitive "VVT swap into 90-97 chassis" Megathread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2017 | 06:37 AM
  #481  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Question for you guys, like an idiot I added the FM Coil Bracket adapter that does not fit the VVT engine because of the VVT line. Has anyone simply modified the VVT line to use AN lines instead of the hard lines? That way I could relocate the VVT line out of the way, and use the pretty FM coil bracket.
Old Oct 18, 2017 | 10:55 AM
  #482  
phocup's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 343
Total Cats: 2
Default

whoops .. double post.
Old Oct 18, 2017 | 10:55 AM
  #483  
phocup's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 343
Total Cats: 2
Default

I didn't but I know FM has a kit to relocate that line. Likely using AN lines as well. Sounds like a smart solution.
Old Oct 18, 2017 | 11:24 AM
  #484  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Goingnowherefast
Question for you guys, like an idiot I added the FM Coil Bracket adapter that does not fit the VVT engine because of the VVT line. Has anyone simply modified the VVT line to use AN lines instead of the hard lines? That way I could relocate the VVT line out of the way, and use the pretty FM coil bracket.
I have been running my VVT feed with an AN line for years. FM has directions with the big spark kit and on the website. They say to tap the fitting at the top, I welded on a fitting instead. I have had zero issues with this setup.
Old Oct 18, 2017 | 02:34 PM
  #485  
MX5RACER's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 315
Total Cats: 9
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Goingnowherefast
Question for you guys, like an idiot I added the FM Coil Bracket adapter that does not fit the VVT engine because of the VVT line. Has anyone simply modified the VVT line to use AN lines instead of the hard lines? That way I could relocate the VVT line out of the way, and use the pretty FM coil bracket.
Which bracket did you get? The FM bracket to mount NA coils on a NB head? If so, you still won't be able to mount that bracket to the valve cover, even if you move the VVT line as there are no mounting bosses cast on the valve cover like the NB1 valve cover has.
Old Oct 22, 2017 | 10:22 PM
  #486  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
I have been running my VVT feed with an AN line for years. FM has directions with the big spark kit and on the website. They say to tap the fitting at the top, I welded on a fitting instead. I have had zero issues with this setup.
Originally Posted by MX5RACER
Which bracket did you get? The FM bracket to mount NA coils on a NB head? If so, you still won't be able to mount that bracket to the valve cover, even if you move the VVT line as there are no mounting bosses cast on the valve cover like the NB1 valve cover has.
Thanks for the replies guys! Yeah I figured moving the VVT shouldn't be that big of a deal. Yeah MX5, I stupidly bought the FM 1.8L swap kit and like an idiot didn't realize that I pretty much can't use any of it. Honestly, I didn't end up using a single thing so far.

But good news is I've decided to just bite the bullet and go with a COP system from Fab9 (or LS coils). Might as well just do it right anyways. Also the VVT motor is in the car on Blackbird Fabworx Drop Mounts. Took about 30 minutes to drop in. Also with the help of Greg @ Thecarpassionchannel I created a new injection harness with the VVT power + signal pigtail built in. I think it turned out really well and looks better than OEM tbh.

Name:  WfEmcX4.jpg
Views: 521
Size:  153.4 KB
Old Oct 23, 2017 | 06:39 AM
  #487  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

LS coils. Friends don't let friends fab.
Old Oct 26, 2017 | 08:15 AM
  #488  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
LS coils. Friends don't let friends fab.
I've got a few PM's saying the same thing. That certainly seems to be the prevailing wisdom around here (that LS coils are way better). Is there a main benefit of LS coils over the Fab9 system for low boost (less than 12 PSI) setups?

*Edit* Maybe it's better that I just figure out a way to mount my old ignition system. Get the car running as-is and then figure out an ignition solution.

Last edited by Goingnowherefast; Oct 26, 2017 at 10:34 AM.
Old Oct 26, 2017 | 11:20 AM
  #489  
acedeuce802's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,218
Total Cats: 175
From: Farmington Hills, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Goingnowherefast
I've got a few PM's saying the same thing. That certainly seems to be the prevailing wisdom around here (that LS coils are way better). Is there a main benefit of LS coils over the Fab9 system for low boost (less than 12 PSI) setups?

*Edit* Maybe it's better that I just figure out a way to mount my old ignition system. Get the car running as-is and then figure out an ignition solution.
LS coils work. Fab9 coils sometimes work.
Old Oct 27, 2017 | 08:05 AM
  #490  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by acedeuce802
LS coils work. Fab9 coils sometimes work.
So after doing some research, I'm gonna hold off on ignition for now. I'll be cutting, drilling and tapping the VVT ports for a 1/8 NPT to -4AN line so that I can move the VVT line where ever I want as seen here: https://www.miataturbo.net/build-thr...5/#post1437790

This seems to be a good idea for those not wanting to mess with the ignition system but they don't want some wonky homemade coil bracket. I'll DIY an LS coil setup if I run into ignition problems down the line.

*EDIT* The best thing about this place is people will call out your stupid ideas. I need to be called a dumbass, and people do that here on the daily. That's why I love this place.
Old Nov 7, 2017 | 03:46 AM
  #491  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

So what are you guys using for exhaust setups? I've decided to go with a 01-05 Racing Beat Header (since I'm doing a Rotrex install down the line) with a 90-97 Yonaka cat-back. I currently have a test pipe for a 90-93 but obviously that won't bolt up to the 01-05 Racing Beat header. Should I simply take it to an exhaust shop and say "hey, please connect these pipes without cutting the flanges off?" Does anyone else have a more elegant solution?
Old Nov 7, 2017 | 06:34 AM
  #492  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Use a 94-97 header.
Old Nov 7, 2017 | 06:36 AM
  #493  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Use a 94-97 header.
I'm an idiot haha. I would if I didn't just purchase the racing beat for 01-05 and put it on the car already.
Old Nov 7, 2017 | 06:38 AM
  #494  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Then swap to an NB chassis And NB cat back. Every other solution is not elegant.
Old Nov 7, 2017 | 07:07 AM
  #495  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Then swap to an NB chassis And NB cat back. Every other solution is not elegant.
I give that advice to every person I talk to that wants a Miata. I just wish I wasn't stupid a year ago when I bought mine. The little things start adding up and you begin to realize just how much better the NB1 and NB2 platforms are.

From OBD2, 1.8L's, VTPS, ABS in more cars, Torsen LSD's, better synchro's in the 5-spds, much better aero, better tophats that increase travel etc. I could go on and on. There's just a huge list of improvements that makes the early cars objectively worse. But like all stupid folks, the lure of a cheap price and the thought that it will be easy to change all that won me over.
Old Nov 7, 2017 | 10:12 AM
  #496  
Roda's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,647
Total Cats: 446
From: Sierra Vista, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Goingnowherefast
So what are you guys using for exhaust setups?
When I did my swap, I still had the stock 1.6 exhaust on the car, so I was essentially starting from scratch.

To save some $$ at swap time, I used the stock VVT header and downpipe, and fabricated from there back with a 2.5" pipe, universal cat, resonator, and muffler. Got most of it from Summit, and it wasn't overly expensive. I recently obtained an NB2 Racing Beat header which bolted right up to my 'NB' exhaust...

Last edited by Roda; Nov 7, 2017 at 02:57 PM.
Old Nov 7, 2017 | 11:56 AM
  #497  
greddygalant's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 771
Total Cats: 39
From: Beaverton, OR
Default

We used a 01+ racing beat header with a custom test pipe into a 93 chassis with a 93 exhaust. Worked great.
Old Nov 13, 2017 | 11:12 AM
  #498  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Tis a sad day indeed. Attempted my first start: Car cranks but does not fire. Composite log attached. I have sync counter loses.

Lots of variables at stake here. Car's been sitting for weeks. It's cold, I'm on full E85, and the battery could be low on power (on a trickle charger right now)
Attached Files
File Type: csv
2017-11-13_10.52.45.csv (30.4 KB, 153 views)
Old Dec 19, 2017 | 04:55 PM
  #499  
96morbst's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 88
Total Cats: 8
From: Boston Mass
Default

So question about fuel setup. I just put a complete 03 long block into my 96 chassis with a 95 harness. Do I have to swap to the nb1 fuel rail and the na6 FPR still? I plan on using an nb1 intake manifold for the time being. Running the car on an AEM EMS-4
Old Dec 20, 2017 | 04:24 PM
  #500  
kevinspann's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 11
From: Richmond VA
Default

Originally Posted by 96morbst
So question about fuel setup. I just put a complete 03 long block into my 96 chassis with a 95 harness. Do I have to swap to the nb1 fuel rail and the na6 FPR still? I plan on using an nb1 intake manifold for the time being. Running the car on an AEM EMS-4
I believe so, because the NB are return-less systems. Using the NA6 FPR gets you the return with the NB1 fuel rail. I think that the fuel rails need to match the intake you're using. I'm sure someone will correct me if that's wrong info.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 PM.