Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Engine Mount Debate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2021, 08:59 PM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
ThomasR1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 8
Total Cats: 2
Default Engine Mount Debate?

Anybody ever debate engine mounts? I currently have Megan's but they are not cutting it.

AWR's seem like the right choice but I have seen the Innovatives also. What is everyone's opinion?
ThomasR1991 is offline  
Old 11-25-2021, 10:21 PM
  #2  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default


18psi is offline  
Old 11-26-2021, 07:38 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
rwyatt365's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,350
Total Cats: 128
Default

FWIW - I have had the AWR mounts on my car for years. They get the job done in my opinion.
rwyatt365 is offline  
Old 11-26-2021, 10:03 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Arca_ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,628
Total Cats: 428
Default

Just get the AWR with the softest duro bushings they offer.
Arca_ex is offline  
Old 11-30-2021, 05:27 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JakZe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Hawaii - Kauai
Posts: 124
Total Cats: 8
Default

I've tried both, and both are good, just run the softest option they have for either. Unless you want to turn your car into a giant vibrator
JakZe is offline  
Old 12-05-2021, 02:56 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
engineered2win's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 189
Total Cats: 48
Default

I like the Innovative mounts. The 60A bushings are quite streetable. I bought them for my TT6 race car, because the BFW race mounts I had installed were just too freaking stiff, even for a race car. They were exciting the entire freaking car. Everything rattled and vibrated and I was having issues with random things loosening up. Like WTF I suddenly can't go over 40mph at part throttle because the car is misfiring horrifically. Oh, all the bolts for the coil packs have vibrated loose and they're rattling around...
I get none of that with the Innovative 60A mounts, which feel pretty close to stock as far as NVH. Who would have thought engine mounts to be a reliability mod.
The only downside is that they don't control the engine enough for my taste and the shifter does move around some. So I'll be swapping to stiffer bushings this winter to see if I can find a sweet spot between shifter movement and vibration.
engineered2win is offline  
Old 12-05-2021, 07:38 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
OptionXIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 409
Total Cats: 114
Default

I traded BFW Street mounts for Innovative. I couldn't stand the vibration of the BFWs, someone else wanted better control of the engine movement. When I first sat in the car with Innovative mounts, I couldn't believe they were poly based on my experience with BFW. The difference is that extreme.
OptionXIII is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 11:21 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
mjcanton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 55
Total Cats: 4
Default

I have the SuperMiata hybrid mounts - they use 1 of their race mounts with a 70 duro bushing, and the other side is a MazdaSpeed competition mount. They greatly improved the shift feel compared to stock. The NVH isn't terrible, but it is noticeable, especially at low speeds/idle. It's fine for a street driven car but might get annoying for if you daily with the top up.

Does anyone have experience with the SM hybrid mounts vs their race mounts, or Innovative, or AWR for street applications?
mjcanton is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 07:02 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
electroCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 113
Total Cats: 55
Default

I've had the AWR 70 duro mounts installed for quite a while now. I would personally never go stiffer than this setup. NVH is at the edge of acceptability for me, even for a track toy.
electroCrunch is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 07:10 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

My experience with both the BBFW and the V8R mounts is that they're completely unusable.
I have 70A AWRs in the not-street car, and Innovative 60A in the street car. Both are great for their purposes.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 07:42 PM
  #11  
lvw
Junior Member
 
lvw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hanover,Va
Posts: 143
Total Cats: 4
Default

Explain unusable, I have had the V8R cadillac mounts for some time and am happy with them. Enlighten me please.
lvw is offline  
Old 12-06-2021, 07:57 PM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

From what i've gathered in the over 10 years i've been a member of this community is that if you do not have a perfectly balanced rotating assembly you're going to want the softest, most well engineered, and expensive mounts you can buy.

I have also learned this from experience. Instead of spending $300 on engine mounts, i spent $60 on engine mounts and $1000 on balancing my built engine.
Erat is offline  
Old 12-07-2021, 09:33 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
andym's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 559
Total Cats: 77
Default

Originally Posted by lvw
Explain unusable, I have had the V8R cadillac mounts for some time and am happy with them. Enlighten me please.
My v8r Cadillac mounts are unusable. I am on clevis set #2 and it's not a great design.





andym is offline  
Old 12-07-2021, 09:53 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by lvw
Explain unusable, I have had the V8R cadillac mounts for some time and am happy with them. Enlighten me please.
I've been through the equivalent of 4.5 sets to find that they transmit huge vibrations because the sleeve is undersized for the bushing (just like BBFW) and in my case, the bushing cage was interference fit against the clevis base. Both of these together means the bushing does nothing and you may as well have solid steel mounts. Really horrid.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 12-07-2021, 02:38 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
soot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SLC,UT
Posts: 293
Total Cats: 80
Default

I have tried AWR, hybrid, mazdacomp, bbfw and the innovative mounts seem to control the engine just as well but have the best NVH other than the mazdacomps that tear every season. Innovative are worth every penny. Get the softest still rated for your power.
I had them on my 1.6 and I ordered another set for my VVT motor since I can't imagine going back. NVH might even be as low as the mazdacomps, and it's 100% better than the hybrid setup. Make sure to do the diff mounts at the same time so the PPF isn't getting twisted as much by power.
soot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sailor Jerry
General Miata Chat
14
02-15-2020 12:39 PM
Doppelgänger
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
79
12-30-2013 12:26 PM
jim_rocketmow
Engine Performance
24
04-25-2012 12:39 PM
Nagase
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
23
02-25-2011 02:15 AM
Mach929
General Miata Chat
8
04-05-2008 02:56 PM



Quick Reply: Engine Mount Debate?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.